Literature DB >> 27941126

Evolution of Resistance Against CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Drive.

Robert L Unckless1, Andrew G Clark2,3, Philipp W Messer4.   

Abstract

CRISPR/Cas9 gene drive (CGD) promises to be a highly adaptable approach for spreading genetically engineered alleles throughout a species, even if those alleles impair reproductive success. CGD has been shown to be effective in laboratory crosses of insects, yet it remains unclear to what extent potential resistance mechanisms will affect the dynamics of this process in large natural populations. Here we develop a comprehensive population genetic framework for modeling CGD dynamics, which incorporates potential resistance mechanisms as well as random genetic drift. Using this framework, we calculate the probability that resistance against CGD evolves from standing genetic variation, de novo mutation of wild-type alleles, or cleavage repair by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ)-a likely by-product of CGD itself. We show that resistance to standard CGD approaches should evolve almost inevitably in most natural populations, unless repair of CGD-induced cleavage via NHEJ can be effectively suppressed, or resistance costs are on par with those of the driver. The key factor determining the probability that resistance evolves is the overall rate at which resistance alleles arise at the population level by mutation or NHEJ. By contrast, the conversion efficiency of the driver, its fitness cost, and its introduction frequency have only minor impact. Our results shed light on strategies that could facilitate the engineering of drivers with lower resistance potential, and motivate the possibility to embrace resistance as a possible mechanism for controlling a CGD approach. This study highlights the need for careful modeling of the population dynamics of CGD prior to the actual release of a driver construct into the wild.
Copyright © 2017 by the Genetics Society of America.

Keywords:  CRISPR/Cas9; gene drive; homing drive; mutagenic chain reaction; whole population replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27941126      PMCID: PMC5289854          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.116.197285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  43 in total

1.  On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population.

Authors:  M KIMURA
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Cheating evolution: engineering gene drives to manipulate the fate of wild populations.

Authors:  Jackson Champer; Anna Buchman; Omar S Akbari
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Soft sweeps: molecular population genetics of adaptation from standing genetic variation.

Authors:  Joachim Hermisson; Pleuni S Pennings
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Population extinction and the genetics of adaptation.

Authors:  H Allen Orr; Robert L Unckless
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 5.  Chromosome rearrangements for the control of insect pests.

Authors:  G G Foster; M J Whitten; T Prout; R Gill
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  CRISPR/Cas9-Derived Mutations Both Inhibit HIV-1 Replication and Accelerate Viral Escape.

Authors:  Zhen Wang; Qinghua Pan; Patrick Gendron; Weijun Zhu; Fei Guo; Shan Cen; Mark A Wainberg; Chen Liang
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 9.423

7.  First steps towards underdominant genetic transformation of insect populations.

Authors:  R Guy Reeves; Jarosław Bryk; Philipp M Altrock; Jai A Denton; Floyd A Reed
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Lethal gene drive selects inbreeding.

Authors:  James J Bull
Journal:  Evol Med Public Health       Date:  2016-11-08

Review 9.  Concerning RNA-guided gene drives for the alteration of wild populations.

Authors:  Kevin M Esvelt; Andrea L Smidler; Flaminia Catteruccia; George M Church
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  A CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive system targeting female reproduction in the malaria mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Andrew Hammond; Roberto Galizi; Kyros Kyrou; Alekos Simoni; Carla Siniscalchi; Dimitris Katsanos; Matthew Gribble; Dean Baker; Eric Marois; Steven Russell; Austin Burt; Nikolai Windbichler; Andrea Crisanti; Tony Nolan
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  103 in total

1.  Pathway to Deployment of Gene Drive Mosquitoes as a Potential Biocontrol Tool for Elimination of Malaria in Sub-Saharan Africa: Recommendations of a Scientific Working Group.

Authors:  Stephanie James; Frank H Collins; Philip A Welkhoff; Claudia Emerson; H Charles J Godfray; Michael Gottlieb; Brian Greenwood; Steve W Lindsay; Charles M Mbogo; Fredros O Okumu; Hector Quemada; Moussa Savadogo; Jerome A Singh; Karen H Tountas; Yeya T Touré
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.345

2.  Variability in the durability of CRISPR-Cas immunity.

Authors:  Hélène Chabas; Antoine Nicot; Sean Meaden; Edze R Westra; Denise M Tremblay; Léa Pradier; Sébastien Lion; Sylvain Moineau; Sylvain Gandon
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The ecology and evolution of microbial CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems.

Authors:  Edze R Westra; Stineke van Houte; Sylvain Gandon; Rachel Whitaker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Technoscience and Biodiversity Conservation.

Authors:  Christophe Boëte
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2018-12-28

5.  Using CRISPR-based gene drive for agriculture pest control.

Authors:  Virginie Courtier-Orgogozo; Baptiste Morizot; Christophe Boëte
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Drive: Growing Pains for a New Technology.

Authors:  Floyd A Reed
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Gene drives thwarted by emergence of resistant organisms.

Authors:  Ewen Callaway
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Considerations for the governance of gene drive organisms.

Authors:  Larisa Rudenko; Megan J Palmer; Kenneth Oye
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Reducing resistance allele formation in CRISPR gene drive.

Authors:  Jackson Champer; Jingxian Liu; Suh Yeon Oh; Riona Reeves; Anisha Luthra; Nathan Oakes; Andrew G Clark; Philipp W Messer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Gene drives in plants: opportunities and challenges for weed control and engineered resilience.

Authors:  Luke G Barrett; Mathieu Legros; Nagalingam Kumaran; Donna Glassop; S Raghu; Donald M Gardiner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.