Literature DB >> 30918006

CRISPR Gene Drive Efficiency and Resistance Rate Is Highly Heritable with No Common Genetic Loci of Large Effect.

Jackson Champer1,2, Zhaoxin Wen3,2, Anisha Luthra3,2, Riona Reeves3,2, Joan Chung3,2, Chen Liu3,2, Yoo Lim Lee3,2, Jingxian Liu3,2, Emily Yang3,2, Philipp W Messer3, Andrew G Clark1,2.   

Abstract

Gene drives could allow for control of vector-borne diseases by directly suppressing vector populations or spreading genetic payloads designed to reduce pathogen transmission. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) homing gene drives work by cleaving wild-type alleles, which are then converted to drive alleles by homology-directed repair, increasing the frequency of the drive in a population over time. However, resistance alleles can form when end-joining repair takes place in lieu of homology-directed repair. Such alleles cannot be converted to drive alleles, which would eventually halt the spread of a drive through a population. To investigate the effects of natural genetic variation on resistance formation, we developed a CRISPR homing gene drive in Drosophila melanogaster and crossed it into the genetically diverse Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP) lines, measuring several performance parameters. Most strikingly, resistance allele formation postfertilization in the early embryo ranged from 7 to 79% among lines and averaged 42 ± 18%. We performed a genome-wide association study using our results in the DGRP lines, and found that the resistance and conversion rates were not explained by common alleles of large effect, but instead there were several genetic polymorphisms showing weak association. RNA interference knockdown of several genes containing these polymorphisms confirmed their effect, but the small effect sizes imply that their manipulation would likely yield only modest improvements to the efficacy of gene drives.
Copyright © 2019 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR; DGRP; GWAS; RNAi; biological control; drive performance; gene drive; genetic variation; homing drive; resistance alleles

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30918006      PMCID: PMC6499522          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.119.302037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  28 in total

1.  A simple procedure for estimating the false discovery rate.

Authors:  Cyril Dalmasso; Philippe Broët; Thierry Moreau
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-10-12       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.

Authors:  Shaun Purcell; Benjamin Neale; Kathe Todd-Brown; Lori Thomas; Manuel A R Ferreira; David Bender; Julian Maller; Pamela Sklar; Paul I W de Bakker; Mark J Daly; Pak C Sham
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Self-processing of ribozyme-flanked RNAs into guide RNAs in vitro and in vivo for CRISPR-mediated genome editing.

Authors:  Yangbin Gao; Yunde Zhao
Journal:  J Integr Plant Biol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 7.061

4.  Genome editing. The mutagenic chain reaction: a method for converting heterozygous to homozygous mutations.

Authors:  Valentino M Gantz; Ethan Bier
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Boosting CRISPR/Cas9 multiplex editing capability with the endogenous tRNA-processing system.

Authors:  Kabin Xie; Bastian Minkenberg; Yinong Yang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Multiplexed and programmable regulation of gene networks with an integrated RNA and CRISPR/Cas toolkit in human cells.

Authors:  Lior Nissim; Samuel D Perli; Alexandra Fridkin; Pablo Perez-Pinera; Timothy K Lu
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Genome-wide efficient mixed-model analysis for association studies.

Authors:  Xiang Zhou; Matthew Stephens
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  The Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel.

Authors:  Trudy F C Mackay; Stephen Richards; Eric A Stone; Antonio Barbadilla; Julien F Ayroles; Dianhui Zhu; Sònia Casillas; Yi Han; Michael M Magwire; Julie M Cridland; Mark F Richardson; Robert R H Anholt; Maite Barrón; Crystal Bess; Kerstin Petra Blankenburg; Mary Anna Carbone; David Castellano; Lesley Chaboub; Laura Duncan; Zeke Harris; Mehwish Javaid; Joy Christina Jayaseelan; Shalini N Jhangiani; Katherine W Jordan; Fremiet Lara; Faye Lawrence; Sandra L Lee; Pablo Librado; Raquel S Linheiro; Richard F Lyman; Aaron J Mackey; Mala Munidasa; Donna Marie Muzny; Lynne Nazareth; Irene Newsham; Lora Perales; Ling-Ling Pu; Carson Qu; Miquel Ràmia; Jeffrey G Reid; Stephanie M Rollmann; Julio Rozas; Nehad Saada; Lavanya Turlapati; Kim C Worley; Yuan-Qing Wu; Akihiko Yamamoto; Yiming Zhu; Casey M Bergman; Kevin R Thornton; David Mittelman; Richard A Gibbs
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Natural variation in genome architecture among 205 Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel lines.

Authors:  Wen Huang; Andreas Massouras; Yutaka Inoue; Jason Peiffer; Miquel Ràmia; Aaron M Tarone; Lavanya Turlapati; Thomas Zichner; Dianhui Zhu; Richard F Lyman; Michael M Magwire; Kerstin Blankenburg; Mary Anna Carbone; Kyle Chang; Lisa L Ellis; Sonia Fernandez; Yi Han; Gareth Highnam; Carl E Hjelmen; John R Jack; Mehwish Javaid; Joy Jayaseelan; Divya Kalra; Sandy Lee; Lora Lewis; Mala Munidasa; Fiona Ongeri; Shohba Patel; Lora Perales; Agapito Perez; LingLing Pu; Stephanie M Rollmann; Robert Ruth; Nehad Saada; Crystal Warner; Aneisa Williams; Yuan-Qing Wu; Akihiko Yamamoto; Yiqing Zhang; Yiming Zhu; Robert R H Anholt; Jan O Korbel; David Mittelman; Donna M Muzny; Richard A Gibbs; Antonio Barbadilla; J Spencer Johnston; Eric A Stone; Stephen Richards; Bart Deplancke; Trudy F C Mackay
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 10.  Heritable strategies for controlling insect vectors of disease.

Authors:  Austin Burt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  14 in total

1.  Exploiting a Y chromosome-linked Cas9 for sex selection and gene drive.

Authors:  Stephanie Gamez; Duverney Chaverra-Rodriguez; Anna Buchman; Nikolay P Kandul; Stelia C Mendez-Sanchez; Jared B Bennett; Héctor M Sánchez C; Ting Yang; Igor Antoshechkin; Jonny E Duque; Philippos A Papathanos; John M Marshall; Omar S Akbari
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  A CRISPR homing gene drive targeting a haplolethal gene removes resistance alleles and successfully spreads through a cage population.

Authors:  Jackson Champer; Emily Yang; Esther Lee; Jingxian Liu; Andrew G Clark; Philipp W Messer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  Spatial structure undermines parasite suppression by gene drive cargo.

Authors:  James J Bull; Christopher H Remien; Richard Gomulkiewicz; Stephen M Krone
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Genetic Variation and Potential for Resistance Development to the tTA Overexpression Lethal System in Insects.

Authors:  Katherine E Knudsen; William R Reid; Traci M Barbour; Laci M Bowes; Juliana Duncan; Elaina Philpott; Samantha Potter; Maxwell J Scott
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.154

5.  A toxin-antidote CRISPR gene drive system for regional population modification.

Authors:  Jackson Champer; Esther Lee; Emily Yang; Chen Liu; Andrew G Clark; Philipp W Messer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Design and analysis of CRISPR-based underdominance toxin-antidote gene drives.

Authors:  Jackson Champer; Samuel E Champer; Isabel K Kim; Andrew G Clark; Philipp W Messer
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 5.183

7.  Evading resistance to gene drives.

Authors:  Richard Gomulkiewicz; Micki L Thies; James J Bull
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Modeling CRISPR gene drives for suppression of invasive rodents using a supervised machine learning framework.

Authors:  Samuel E Champer; Nathan Oakes; Ronin Sharma; Pablo García-Díaz; Jackson Champer; Philipp W Messer
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 4.779

9.  Gene drive for population genetic control: non-functional resistance and parental effects.

Authors:  Andrea K Beaghton; Andrew Hammond; Tony Nolan; Andrea Crisanti; Austin Burt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Modelling the suppression of a malaria vector using a CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive to reduce female fertility.

Authors:  Ace R North; Austin Burt; H Charles J Godfray
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 7.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.