Lynn Marie Trotti1, Beth A Staab, David B Rye. 1. Program in Sleep, Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA. Lbecke2@emory.edu
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Differentiation of narcolepsy without cataplexy from idiopathic hypersomnia relies entirely upon the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT). However, the test-retest reliability for these central nervous system hypersomnias has never been determined. METHODS: Patients with narcolepsy without cataplexy, idiopathic hypersomnia, and physiologic hypersomnia who underwent two diagnostic multiple sleep latency tests were identified retrospectively. Correlations between the mean sleep latencies on the two studies were evaluated, and we probed for demographic and clinical features associated with reproducibility versus change in diagnosis. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (58% women, mean age 34 years) were included. Inter -test interval was 4.2 ± 3.8 years (range 2.5 months to 16.9 years). Mean sleep latencies on the first and second tests were 5.5 (± 3.7 SD) and 7.3 (± 3.9) minutes, respectively, with no significant correlation (r = 0.17, p = 0.31). A change in diagnosis occurred in 53% of patients, and was accounted for by a difference in the mean sleep latency (N = 15, 42%) or the number of sleep onset REM periods (N = 11, 31%). The only feature predictive of a diagnosis change was a history of hypnagogic or hypnopompic hallucinations. CONCLUSIONS: The multiple sleep latency test demonstrates poor test-retest reliability in a clinical population of patients with central nervous system hypersomnia evaluated in a tertiary referral center. Alternative diagnostic tools are needed.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Differentiation of narcolepsy without cataplexy from idiopathic hypersomnia relies entirely upon the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT). However, the test-retest reliability for these central nervous system hypersomnias has never been determined. METHODS:Patients with narcolepsy without cataplexy, idiopathic hypersomnia, and physiologic hypersomnia who underwent two diagnostic multiple sleep latency tests were identified retrospectively. Correlations between the mean sleep latencies on the two studies were evaluated, and we probed for demographic and clinical features associated with reproducibility versus change in diagnosis. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (58% women, mean age 34 years) were included. Inter -test interval was 4.2 ± 3.8 years (range 2.5 months to 16.9 years). Mean sleep latencies on the first and second tests were 5.5 (± 3.7 SD) and 7.3 (± 3.9) minutes, respectively, with no significant correlation (r = 0.17, p = 0.31). A change in diagnosis occurred in 53% of patients, and was accounted for by a difference in the mean sleep latency (N = 15, 42%) or the number of sleep onset REM periods (N = 11, 31%). The only feature predictive of a diagnosis change was a history of hypnagogic or hypnopompic hallucinations. CONCLUSIONS: The multiple sleep latency test demonstrates poor test-retest reliability in a clinical population of patients with central nervous system hypersomnia evaluated in a tertiary referral center. Alternative diagnostic tools are needed.
Authors: Y Dauvilliers; C R Baumann; B Carlander; M Bischof; T Blatter; M Lecendreux; F Maly; A Besset; J Touchon; M Billiard; M Tafti; C L Bassetti Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: David B Rye; Donald L Bliwise; Kathy Parker; Lynn Marie Trotti; Prabhjyot Saini; Jacqueline Fairley; Amanda Freeman; Paul S Garcia; Michael J Owens; James C Ritchie; Andrew Jenkins Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Caroline Maness; Prabhjyot Saini; Donald L Bliwise; Victoria Olvera; David B Rye; Lynn M Trotti Journal: J Sleep Res Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 3.981
Authors: Cathy A Goldstein; Richard B Berry; David T Kent; David A Kristo; Azizi A Seixas; Susan Redline; M Brandon Westover Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Lynn Marie Trotti; Jason C Ong; David T Plante; Catherine Friederich Murray; Rebecca King; Donald L Bliwise Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2020-09-02 Impact factor: 3.492