Literature DB >> 15837445

Sensitivity, specificity and other diagnostic measures with multiple sites per unit.

Christiana Drake1, Richard A Levine.   

Abstract

Medical researchers often study the performance of diagnostic tools. The performance of the diagnostic tool is evaluated by calculating sensitivity, specificity and similar measures. Sensitivity is defined as the probability of a positive diagnostic test in a patient with the illness or injury for which the test serves as a diagnostic tool. Specificity is the probability of a negative diagnostic test in a patient free of the disease or injury. For some conditions, the test is applied to several anatomic locations or at different times in a patient and each test can be positive or negative. The findings of the tests performed on the same patient are correlated and any summary measure should account for this correlation. We propose a summary measure for the subject that combines the results from all tests performed on the same patient while accounting for the correlation. The measure is easily calculated and requires no specific statistical software. We also provide an estimate of the standard error and confidence intervals. The method is illustrated with a study, conducted at the University of California, Davis School of Medicine, of the sensitivity of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and plain film (PF) radiography in detecting injuries in the cervical spine, such as fractures and soft tissue injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15837445     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2004.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  3 in total

1.  Ability of the Multisensory Jawbone UP3 to Quantify and Classify Sleep in Patients With Suspected Central Disorders of Hypersomnolence: A Comparison Against Polysomnography and Actigraphy.

Authors:  Jesse D Cook; Michael L Prairie; David T Plante
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.062

2.  Accuracy of dual-source CT to identify significant coronary artery disease in patients with uncontrolled hypertension presenting with chest pain: comparison with coronary angiography.

Authors:  Mohamed Marwan; Tobias Pflederer; Tiziano Schepis; Martin Seltmann; Lutz Klinghammer; Gerd Muschiol; Dieter Ropers; Werner G Daniel; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-06-19       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Evaluation of peripheral arterial disease with nonenhanced quiescent-interval single-shot MR angiography.

Authors:  Philip A Hodnett; Ioannis Koktzoglou; Amir H Davarpanah; Timothy G Scanlon; Jeremy D Collins; John J Sheehan; Eugene E Dunkle; Navyash Gupta; James C Carr; Robert R Edelman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 11.105

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.