Literature DB >> 29732417

Perioperative care for lumbar microdiscectomy: a survey of Australasian neurosurgeons.

Christopher D Daly1,2,3, Kai Zheong Lim1,2, Peter Ghosh3,4, Tony Goldschlager1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lumbar microdiscectomy is the most commonly performed spine surgery procedure. Over time it has evolved to a minimally invasive procedure. Traditionally patients were advised to restrict activity following lumbar spine surgery. However, post-operative instructions are heterogeneous. The purpose of this report is to assess, by survey, the perioperative care practices of Australasian neurosurgeons in the minimally invasive era.
METHODS: A survey was conducted by email invitation sent to all full members of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia (NSA). This consisted of 11 multi-choice questions relating to operative indications, technique, and post-operative instructions for lumbar microdiscectomy answered by an electronically distributed anonymized online survey.
RESULTS: The survey was sent to all Australasian Neurosurgeons. In total, 68 complete responses were received (28.9%). Most surgeons reported they would consider a period of either 4 to 8 weeks (42.7%) or 8 to 12 weeks (32.4%) as the minimum duration of radicular pain adequate to offer surgery. Unilateral muscle dissection with unilateral discectomy was practiced by 76.5%. Operative microscopy was the most commonly employed method of magnification (76.5%). The majority (55.9%) always refer patients to undergo inpatient physiotherapy. Sitting restrictions were advised by 38.3%. Lifting restrictions were advised by 83.8%.
CONCLUSIONS: Australasian neurosurgical lumbar microdiscectomy perioperative care practices are generally consistent with international practices and demonstrate a similar degree of heterogeneity. Recommendation of post-operative activity restrictions by Australasian neurosurgeons is still common. This suggests a role for the investigation of the necessity of such restrictions in the era of minimally invasive spine surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Spine; discectomy; neurosurgery; perioperative care; surveys and questionnaires

Year:  2018        PMID: 29732417      PMCID: PMC5911755          DOI: 10.21037/jss.2018.01.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2414-4630


  21 in total

1.  Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Tor D Tosteson; Jon D Lurie; Anna N A Tosteson; Brett Hanscom; Jonathan S Skinner; William A Abdu; Alan S Hilibrand; Scott D Boden; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Lumbar discectomy: a national survey of neurosurgeons and literature review.

Authors:  Aleksa Cenic; Edward Kachur
Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  Why are response rates in clinician surveys declining?

Authors:  Ellen R Wiebe; Janusz Kaczorowski; Jacqueline MacKay
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Management of sciatica due to lumbar disc herniation in the Netherlands: a survey among spine surgeons.

Authors:  Mark P Arts; Wilco C Peul; Bart W Koes; Ralph T W M Thomeer
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2008-07

5.  General practice postal surveys: a questionnaire too far?

Authors:  B R McAvoy; E F Kaner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-09-21

Review 6.  Operative management of lumbar disc herniation : the evolution of knowledge and surgical techniques in the last century.

Authors:  F Postacchini; R Postacchini
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2011

Review 7.  Is there a rational basis for post-surgical lifting restrictions? 2. Possible scientific approach.

Authors:  M H Pope; M L Magnusson; D G Wilder; V K Goel; K Spratt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Is there a rational basis for post-surgical lifting restrictions? 1. Current understanding.

Authors:  M L Magnusson; M H Pope; D G Wilder; M Szpalski; K Spratt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  The effect of short (2-weeks) versus long (6-weeks) post-operative restrictions following lumbar discectomy: a prospective randomized control trial.

Authors:  Christopher M Bono; Dana A Leonard; Thomas D Cha; Joseph H Schwab; Kirkham B Wood; Mitchel B Harris; Andrew J Schoenfeld
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  National audit of post-operative management in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Alison H McGregor; Ben Dicken; Konrad Jamrozik
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  1 in total

1.  Survey of lumbar discectomy practices: 10 years in the making.

Authors:  Majid Aljoghaiman; Amanda Martyniuk; Forough Farrokhyar; Aleksa Cenic; Edward Kachur
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.