Literature DB >> 10413341

Is there a rational basis for post-surgical lifting restrictions? 1. Current understanding.

M L Magnusson1, M H Pope, D G Wilder, M Szpalski, K Spratt.   

Abstract

Lifting restrictions postoperatively are quite common, but there appears to be little scientific basis for them. Lifting restrictions are inhibitory in terms of return to work and may be a factor in chronicity. The mean functional spinal motion unit stiffness changes with in vitro or computer-simulated discectomies, facetectomies and laminectomies were reviewed from the literature. We modified the NIOSH lifting equation to include another multiplier related to stiffness change post surgery. The new recommended lifts were computed for different lifting conditions seen in industry. The reduction of rotational stiffness ranged from 21% to 41% for a discectomy, 1% to 59% for a facetectomy and 4% to 16% for a partial laminectomy. The recommended lifts based on our modified equation were adjusted accordingly. There is no rational basis for current lifting restrictions. The risk to the spine is a function of many other variables as well as weight (i.e., distance of weight from body). The adjusted NIOSH guidelines provide a reasonable way to estimate weight restrictions and accommodations such as lifting aids. Such restrictions should be as liberal as possible so as to facilitate, not prevent, return to work. Patients need more advice regarding lifting activities and clinicians should be more knowledgeable about the working conditions and constraints of a given workplace to effectively match the solution to the patient's condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10413341      PMCID: PMC3611163          DOI: 10.1007/s005860050153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  7 in total

Review 1.  The development of an evidence-based patient booklet for patients undergoing lumbar discectomy and un-instrumented decompression.

Authors:  A H McGregor; A K Burton; P Sell; G Waddell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Evaluation of the Impact of the Revised National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Lifting Equation.

Authors:  Ming-Lun Lu; Vern Putz-Anderson; Arun Garg; Kermit G Davis
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.888

3.  Perioperative care for lumbar microdiscectomy: a survey of Australasian neurosurgeons.

Authors:  Christopher D Daly; Kai Zheong Lim; Peter Ghosh; Tony Goldschlager
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-03

4.  National audit of post-operative management in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Alison H McGregor; Ben Dicken; Konrad Jamrozik
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Patient Information Leaflets for Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Missed Opportunity.

Authors:  Matthew Low; Louise C Burgess; Thomas W Wainwright
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2019-12-26

6.  Function after spinal treatment, exercise and rehabilitation (FASTER): improving the functional outcome of spinal surgery.

Authors:  A H McGregor; C J Doré; T P Morris; S Morris; K Jamrozik
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Evidence-based development of a post-surgical lumbar discectomy leaflet intervention: a Delphi consensus study.

Authors:  P C Goodwin; C C Wright; C Allan; L Crowther; C Darley; A Heap; E Paul; L White; A Rushton
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.