Literature DB >> 22611609

Why are response rates in clinician surveys declining?

Ellen R Wiebe1, Janusz Kaczorowski, Jacqueline MacKay.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To understand why response rates in clinician surveys are declining.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional fax-back survey.
SETTING: British Columbia. PARTICIPANTS: Random sample of family physicians and all gynecologists in the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia's registry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Accuracy of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia's registry, and the prevalence and characteristics of physicians with policies not to participate in any surveys.
RESULTS: Of 542 physicians who received surveys, 76 (14.0%) responded. On follow-up we found the following: the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia's registry was inaccurate for 94 (17.3%) listings; 14 (2.6%) physicians were away; 100 (18.5%) were not eligible; and 197 (36.3%) had an office policy not to participate in any surveys. Compared with the respondents, physicians with an office policy not to participate in any surveys were more likely to be men, less likely to be white, more likely to have urban-based practices, and more likely to have been in practice for more than 15 years.
CONCLUSION: Many physicians have an office policy not to participate in any surveys. Owing to the trend of lower response rates, recommendations of minimum response rates for clinician surveys by many journals might need to be reassessed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22611609      PMCID: PMC3325475     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of e-mail, fax, and postal surveys of pediatricians.

Authors:  Shawn R McMahon; Martha Iwamoto; Mehran S Massoudi; Hussain R Yusuf; John M Stevenson; Felicita David; Susan Y Chu; Larry K Pickering
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 2.  Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires.

Authors:  P Edwards; I Roberts; M Clarke; C DiGuiseppi; S Pratap; R Wentz; I Kwan; R Cooper
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18

3.  How to obtain excellent response rates when surveying physicians.

Authors:  C Thorpe; B Ryan; S L McLean; A Burt; M Stewart; J B Brown; G J Reid; S Harris
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 4.  A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians.

Authors:  Karen E A Burns; Mark Duffett; Michelle E Kho; Maureen O Meade; Neill K J Adhikari; Tasnim Sinuff; Deborah J Cook
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Maximising response to postal questionnaires--a systematic review of randomised trials in health research.

Authors:  Rachel A Nakash; Jane L Hutton; Ellen C Jørstad-Stein; Simon Gates; Sarah E Lamb
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Response rates in postal surveys of healthcare professionals between 1996 and 2005: an observational study.

Authors:  Julia V Cook; Heather O Dickinson; Martin P Eccles
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 7.  Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.

Authors:  Philip James Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike J Clarke; Carolyn Diguiseppi; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan; Rachel Cooper; Lambert M Felix; Sarah Pratap
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08
  7 in total
  53 in total

1.  Assessment of Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge and Understanding of the Risk of Blood Typing Interference with Daratumumab: A Survey of 12 European Countries.

Authors:  Mathieu Rosé; Intissar Bourahla; Alessandro Ghiddi; Assem Al-Akabawi; Edmond Chan; Massoud Toussi
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  Therapeutic interventions employed by Greater Toronto Area chiropractors on pregnant patients: results of a cross-sectional online survey.

Authors:  Tammy Yuen; Kayla Wells; Samantha Benoit; Sahila Yohanathan; Lauren Capelletti; Kent Stuber
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2013-06

3.  Third-party online surveys-science, selling, or sugging?

Authors:  S Mazzarello; M Clemons; I D Graham; A A Joy; S Smith; C Jacobs
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Incisionless fluorescent cholangiography (IFC): a pilot survey of surgeons on procedural familiarity, practices, and perceptions.

Authors:  Fernando Dip; Luis Sarotto; Mayank Roy; Aaron Lee; Emanuelle LoMenzo; Matthew Walsh; Thomas Carus; Sylke Schneider; Luigi Boni; Takeaki Ishizawa; Nohiro Kokudo; Kevin White; Raul J Rosenthal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Evaluation of Physician Knowledge of the Key Safety Information for Aflibercept in Canada: Evaluation of Risk-Minimization Measures.

Authors:  Laurie J Zografos; Elizabeth Andrews; Dan L Wolin; Brian Calingaert; Eric K Davenport; Kelly A Hollis; Nada Djokanovic; Vito S Racanelli; Paul Petraro; Zdravko P Vassilev
Journal:  Pharmaceut Med       Date:  2019-06

6.  Physician and Patient Knowledge of Safety and Safe Use Information for Aflibercept in Europe: Evaluation of Risk-Minimization Measures.

Authors:  Laurie J Zografos; Elizabeth Andrews; Daniel L Wolin; Brian Calingaert; Eric K Davenport; Kelly A Hollis; Ursula Maria Schmidt-Ott; Paul Petraro; Zdravko P Vassilev
Journal:  Pharmaceut Med       Date:  2019-06

7.  Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Additional Risk Minimization Measures for Voriconazole in the EU: Findings and Lessons Learned from a Healthcare Professional Survey.

Authors:  Joanna Lem; Muhammad Younus; Jalal A Aram; Shahrzad Moosavi; Klaus Freivogel; Anne Lewis; Rachel E Sobel
Journal:  Pharmaceut Med       Date:  2019-04

8.  How do family physicians measure blood pressure in routine clinical practice? National survey of Canadian family physicians.

Authors:  Janusz Kaczorowski; Martin G Myers; Mark Gelfer; Martin Dawes; Eric J Mang; Angelique Berg; Claudio Del Grande; Dragan Kljujic
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Knowledge and understanding of urinary incontinence: survey of family practitioners in northern Alberta.

Authors:  Katherina Nguyen; Kathleen F Hunter; Adrian Wagg
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Prevalence of Barriers and Facilitators to Enhancing Conservative Kidney Management for Older Adults in the Primary Care Setting.

Authors:  Helen Tam-Tham; Kathryn M King-Shier; Chandra M Thomas; Robert R Quinn; Karen Fruetel; Sara N Davison; Brenda R Hemmelgarn
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 8.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.