Literature DB >> 20731640

Improved doubly robust estimation when data are monotonely coarsened, with application to longitudinal studies with dropout.

Anastasios A Tsiatis1, Marie Davidian, Weihua Cao.   

Abstract

A routine challenge is that of making inference on parameters in a statistical model of interest from longitudinal data subject to dropout, which are a special case of the more general setting of monotonely coarsened data. Considerable recent attention has focused on doubly robust (DR) estimators, which in this context involve positing models for both the missingness (more generally, coarsening) mechanism and aspects of the distribution of the full data, that have the appealing property of yielding consistent inferences if only one of these models is correctly specified. DR estimators have been criticized for potentially disastrous performance when both of these models are even only mildly misspecified. We propose a DR estimator applicable in general monotone coarsening problems that achieves comparable or improved performance relative to existing DR methods, which we demonstrate via simulation studies and by application to data from an AIDS clinical trial.
© 2010, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20731640      PMCID: PMC3061242          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01476.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  8 in total

Review 1.  Handling drop-out in longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Joseph W Hogan; Jason Roy; Christina Korkontzelou
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Comment: improved local efficiency and double robustness.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Tan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 0.968

3.  Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models.

Authors:  Heejung Bang; James M Robins
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Doubly robust generalized estimating equations for longitudinal data.

Authors:  Shaun Seaman; Andrew Copas
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Comment: Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data.

Authors:  Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.901

6.  Improving efficiency and robustness of the doubly robust estimator for a population mean with incomplete data.

Authors:  Weihua Cao; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 2.445

7.  A trial comparing nucleoside monotherapy with combination therapy in HIV-infected adults with CD4 cell counts from 200 to 500 per cubic millimeter. AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 175 Study Team.

Authors:  S M Hammer; D A Katzenstein; M D Hughes; H Gundacker; R T Schooley; R H Haubrich; W K Henry; M M Lederman; J P Phair; M Niu; M S Hirsch; T C Merigan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-10-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Comparative review of methods for handling drop-out in longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Peter M Philipson; Weang Kee Ho; Robin Henderson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

  8 in total
  11 in total

1.  Introduction to Double Robust Methods for Incomplete Data.

Authors:  Shaun R Seaman; Stijn Vansteelandt
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.901

2.  Doubly robust estimation and causal inference in longitudinal studies with dropout and truncation by death.

Authors:  Michelle Shardell; Gregory E Hicks; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Multiple robustness in factorized likelihood models.

Authors:  J Molina; A Rotnitzky; M Sued; J M Robins
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.445

4.  Discussion of "Connections Between Survey Calibration Estimators and Semiparametric Models for Incomplete Data" by T. Lumley, P.A. Shaw & J.Y. Dai.

Authors:  Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Int Stat Rev       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  A new estimation with minimum trace of asymptotic covariance matrix for incomplete longitudinal data with a surrogate process.

Authors:  Baojiang Chen; Jing Qin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Estimating the efficacy of an interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome medication in a randomized trial with both non-adherence and loss to follow-up.

Authors:  Wei Yang; Kathleen J Propert; J Richard Landis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Test the reliability of doubly robust estimation with missing response data.

Authors:  Baojiang Chen; Jing Qin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  A Flexible Bayesian Approach to Monotone Missing Data in Longitudinal Studies with Nonignorable Missingness with Application to an Acute Schizophrenia Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Antonio R Linero; Michael J Daniels
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.033

9.  A Semiparametric Bayesian Approach to Dropout in Longitudinal Studies with Auxiliary Covariates.

Authors:  Tianjian Zhou; Michael J Daniels; Peter Müller
Journal:  J Comput Graph Stat       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 2.302

10.  Improved doubly robust estimation in learning optimal individualized treatment rules.

Authors:  Yinghao Pan; Ying-Qi Zhao
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 5.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.