| Literature DB >> 34556095 |
Huyen Phuc Do1,2, Philip R A Baker3, Thang Van Vo4,5, Aja Murray6, Linda Murray7, Sara Valdebenito8, Manuel Eisner8, Bach Xuan Tran9,10, Michael P Dunne4,11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Girls exposed to violence have a high risk of being victimized as adults and are more likely than non-abused women to have children who are treated violently. This intergenerational transmission may be especially serious when women suffer violence during pregnancy and early motherhood, as it impairs maternal wellbeing and infant health and development. This study examined the intergenerational effects of being exposed to childhood maltreatment (CM) and prenatal intimate partner violence (p-IPV) on perinatal mental distress and birth outcomes in central Vietnam.Entities:
Keywords: Childhood maltreatment; Mediation pathway; Pregnant women; Prenatal intimate partner violence; Violent victimization
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34556095 PMCID: PMC8461881 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-04097-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ISSN: 1471-2393 Impact factor: 3.007
Fig. 1Theoretical model of pathways between violence exposure and birth outcomes
Demographic and prenatal characteristics of pregnant women in Hue city (n = 150)
| A. Demographic and prenatal characteristics | Total | B. Pattern of victimization | N (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29.86 (5.01) | 42 (28) | ||
| 7.28 (1.41) | Lifetime IPV | 24 (16) | |
| p-IPV victimization | 22 (14.67) | ||
| Unemployed | 42 (28.38) | At least one form of CM | 82 (55.03) |
| Blue-collar workers | 46 (31.08) | Childhood emotional abuse (CEA) | 67 (44.67) |
| White-collar workers | 60 (40.54) | Childhood physical abuse (CPA) | 50 (33.33) |
| Childhood sexual abuse (CSA) | 9 (6) | ||
| Up to primary school | 28 (18.92) | Childhood neglect | 2 (1.33) |
| Secondary school | 29 (19.59) | Witnessing violence | 110 (73.33) |
| High school | 23 (15.54) | CM and p-IPV | 16 (10.67) |
| Vocational training, university or higher | 68 (45.95) | 40 (26.67) | |
| 19 (12.84) | IPV and witnessing | 19 (12.67) | |
| 69 (46.6) | CPA and witnessing violence | 46 (30.67) | |
| 27 (18.2) | CSA and witnessing violence | 9 (6) | |
| 12 (14.67) | CEA and witnessing violence | 61 (40.67) | |
| 27 (18) | CPA and IPV | 15 (10) | |
| 112 (74.67) | CSA and IPV | 2 (1.33) | |
| CES and IPV | 16 (10.67) | ||
| Vaginal | 76 (51.35) | CPA and CSA/neglect | 2 (1.33) |
| Planned caesarean | 41 (27.7) | CPA and CEA | 35 (23.33) |
| Instrumental caesarean | 31 (20.95) | CEA and CSA/neglect | 8 (5.33) |
| 11 (7.43) | |||
| 38 (35.33) | CEA, IPV, and witnessing violence | 31 (20.67) | |
| 22 (14.86) | CPA, IPV, and witnessing violence | 13 98.67) | |
| 59 (39.86) | CSA, IPV, and witnessing violence | 2 (1.33) | |
| CEA, CPA, and witnessing violence | 8 (5.33) | ||
| No symptoms | 110 (74.32) | CPA, CPA, and witnessing violence | 34 (22.67) |
| Mild depression | 32 (21.62) | CSA, CPA, and witnessing violence | 5 (3.33) |
| Moderate or severe depression | 6 (4.05) | CPA, CSA, p-IPV, witnessing violence | 1 (0.67) |
Note: CEA Childhood emotional abuse, CSA Childhood sexual abuse, CPA Childhood physical abuse
Fig. 2The pattern of victimization of violence during childhood and motherhood
Multiple Logistic regression model and Augmented Inverse-probability- weighted (AIPW) model for ARR and ARD of p-IPV on mothers’ perinatal wellbeing and infant health outcomes
| Mother’s education (secondary vs. higher) | 0.78 (0.41–1.46) | 1.61 (0.82–3.19) | ||
| Father’s education (secondary vs. higher) | ||||
| Lack of prenatal care (Yes vs. No) | ||||
| Combined forms of CM (Yes vs. No) | ||||
| Unplanned pregnancy | 1.32 (0.86–1.99) | |||
| ACE score | ||||
| Family disruption | 1.471 (1.04–2.481) | |||
| IPV witness as a child | 1.95 (0.95, 4.04) | |||
| At least one form of p-IPV | ||||
| Combined forms of IPV and CM | ||||
| Lack of intergenerational closure | 1.27 (0.96–1.68) | |||
| Lack of neighborhood cohesion | 1.23 (0.96–1.56) | |||
| Pseudo R2/ VIF | 0.30/ 1.14 | 0.16/ 1.15 | 0.13/ 1.07 | 0.12/ 1.25 |
| Hosmer-Lemeshow chi2(8) | 4.95 | 5.79 | 7.03 / 1.2 | 4.34 |
| AIC/BIC | 96.67/114.66 | 166.93/ 184.91 | 157.14/ 175.12 | 160.65/ 174.45 |
| McFadden’s Adj R2/ Cragg & Uhler’s R2 | 0.20/ 0.39 | 0.25/ 0.09 | 0.06/ 0.199 | 0.05/ 0.19 |
| 0.18 (−0.09–0.44) | 0.77 (−2.60–4.15) | |||
Note: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001
Fig. 3Mediation pathway of P-IPV, delivery method, birth outcome and associated factor with standard path coefficients. Model fit well (χ2 (15, n = 148) = 16.84 (p = 0.33), RMSEA (90% CI) = .0037 (.001; .09), CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.97, SRMR = .0039. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001