Literature DB >> 17153511

Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL): initial case report and comparison with open radical procedure.

Marcos Tobias-Machado1, Alessandro Tavares, Wilson R Molina, João Paulo Zambon, Jimmy Angel Medina, Pedro H Forseto, Roberto V Juliano, Eric R Wroclawski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Inguinal metastases are one of the major determinants of mortality in patients with penile cancer. In high risk patients, while prophylatic inguinal lymphadenectomy may offer survival advantages, it still carries a relatively high morbidity. We describe in this paper the first report of the Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (VEIL) in the clinical practice, a technique which aims at reducing the morbidity of the procedure without compromising the cancer control or reducing the template of the dissection.
METHODS: A 40 year old male with a pT2 penile cancer underwent prophylatic bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy 6 weeks after partial penectomy. We performed the VEIL technique at the right and a standard radical inguinal lymphadenectomy through an inguinal incision at the left (control). After developing a plane deep to Scarpa's fascia, locating 3 ports and infusing gas at 5-10 mmHg, a retrograde dissection with the same limits as the standard open surgery was performed. Intraoperative data, patology, post operatory evolution and oncological follow-up is described for both sides.
RESULTS: Operative time was 130 min for the VEIL and 90 min for open surgery. Eight and 7 lymphnodes were retrieved at the VEIL side and open side, respectively, and none of then showed positivity at pathology. There were no complications in the limb which underwent the VEIL and there was skin necrosis in the side of the open surgery. After 25 months of follow up, no signs of disease progression were noted. Asked about how he felt about both surgeries, the patient chose the endoscopic approach.
CONCLUSION: VEIL is feasible in clinical practice. New studies with a greater number of patients and long-term follow-up may confirm the oncological efficacy and possible lower morbidity of these new approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17153511     DOI: 10.4321/s0004-06142006000800020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Esp Urol        ISSN: 0004-0614            Impact factor:   0.436


  11 in total

1.  Robotic-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ioannis D Gkegkes; Evelyn Eleni Minis; Christos Iavazzo
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-05-05

2.  Prospective assessment of postoperative complications and associated costs following inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) in melanoma patients.

Authors:  Sharon B Chang; Robert L Askew; Yan Xing; Storm Weaver; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Jeffrey E Lee; Richard Royal; Anthony Lucci; Merrick I Ross; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (VEIL): Minimally Invasive Radical Inguinal Lymphadenectomy Technique.

Authors:  Rawal Sudhir; Raghunath S Krishnappa; Samir Khanna; R Sekon; Rakesh Koul
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-04

4.  Management of regional lymph node basins in melanoma.

Authors:  Timothy P Love; Keith A Delman
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2010

5.  Robot-assisted video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy for melanoma.

Authors:  Alexis Sánchez; Rene Sotelo; Omaira Rodriguez; Renata Sánchez; José Rosciano; Luis Medina; Liumariel Vegas
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-05-12

6.  Phase 1 prospective evaluation of the oncological adequacy of robotic assisted video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy in patients with penile carcinoma.

Authors:  Surena F Matin; Janice N Cormier; John F Ward; Louis L Pisters; Christopher G Wood; Colin P N Dinney; Richard E Royal; Xuelin Huang; Curtis A Pettaway
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Efficacy and Safety of Lateral Approach-Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (L-VEIL) over Open Inguinal Block Dissection: a Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Sandeep P Nayak; Harshwardhan Pokharkar; Jaiprakash Gurawalia; Kapil Dev; Srinivas Chanduri; M Vijayakumar
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-06-14

8.  Cannula-Assisted Port Placement during Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (VEIL)-a Novel and Safe Technique.

Authors:  Harvinder Singh Pahwa; Ajay Kumar Pal; Awanish Kumar; Sanjeev Misra; Gunjeet Kaur
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-03-09

9.  Endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy in penile cancer: case report and literature review.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Pérez Astigueta; Milagros Abad-Licham; Eloy Silva; Edgar Yan; Hugo Álvarez; Folker Agreda; Mariela Pow-Sang
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2015-10-05

Review 10.  Feasibility and Safety of Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy in Vulvar Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chai-E Liu; Yan Lu; De-Sheng Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.