Literature DB >> 29725736

Conventional plate fixation method versus pre-operative virtual simulation and three-dimensional printing-assisted contoured plate fixation method in the treatment of anterior pelvic ring fracture.

Chun-Chi Hung1, Yuan-Ta Li1, Yu-Ching Chou2, Jia-En Chen3, Chia-Chun Wu1, Hsain-Chung Shen1, Tsu-Te Yeh4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Treating pelvic fractures remains a challenging task for orthopaedic surgeons. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and effectiveness of three-dimensional (3D) printing technology and computer-assisted virtual surgery for pre-operative planning in anterior ring fractures of the pelvis. We hypothesized that using 3D printing models would reduce operation time and significantly improve the surgical outcomes of pelvic fracture repair.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 30 patients with pelvic fractures treated by anterior pelvic fixation with locking plates (14 patients, conventional locking plate fixation; 16 patients, pre-operative virtual simulation with 3D, printing-assisted, pre-contoured, locking plate fixation). We compared operative time, instrumentation time, blood loss, and post-surgical residual displacements, as evaluated on X-ray films, among groups. Statistical analyses evaluated significant differences between the groups for each of these variables.
RESULTS: The patients treated with the virtual simulation and 3D printing-assisted technique had significantly shorter internal fixation times, shorter surgery duration, and less blood loss (- 57 minutes, - 70 minutes, and - 274 ml, respectively; P < 0.05) than patients in the conventional surgery group. However, the post-operative radiological result was similar between groups (P > 0.05). The complication rate was less in the 3D printing group (1/16 patients) than in the conventional surgery group (3/14 patients).
CONCLUSION: The 3D simulation and printing technique is an effective and reliable method for treating anterior pelvic ring fractures. With precise pre-operative planning and accurate execution of the procedures, this time-saving approach can provide a more personalized treatment plan, allowing for a safer orthopaedic surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pelvic fracture; Plate fixation; Pre-operative virtual simulation; Three-dimensional printing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29725736     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-3963-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  14 in total

Review 1.  Office-based rapid prototyping in orthopedic surgery: a novel planning technique and review of the literature.

Authors:  Adam Schwartz; Kyle Money; Mark Spangehl; Steven Hattrup; Richard J Claridge; Christopher Beauchamp
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2015-01

2.  The usefulness of computed tomography following open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures.

Authors:  K O'Shea; J F Quinlan; K Waheed; O H Brady
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.118

3.  Failure of reduction with an external fixator in the management of injuries of the pelvic ring. Long-term evaluation of 110 patients.

Authors:  J Lindahl; E Hirvensalo; O Böstman; S Santavirta
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-11

4.  Application of 3-dimensional printing in hand surgery for production of a novel bone reduction clamp.

Authors:  Sam M Fuller; Daniel R Butz; Curt B Vevang; Mansour V Makhlouf
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 2.230

5.  Preoperative planning in pelvic and acetabular surgery: the value of advanced computerised planning modules.

Authors:  Matej Cimerman; Anze Kristan
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 6.  Use of rapid prototyping and three-dimensional reconstruction modeling in the management of complex fractures.

Authors:  Vaibhav Bagaria; Shirish Deshpande; Darshana D Rasalkar; Abhay Kuthe; Bhawan K Paunipagar
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  CT-generated 3-dimensional models for complex acetabular reconstruction.

Authors:  S Munjal; S S Leopold; D Kornreich; S Shott; H A Finn
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  3-D printout of a DICOM file to aid surgical planning in a 6 year old patient with a large scapular osteochondroma complicating congenital diaphyseal aclasia.

Authors:  Matthew D Tam; Stephen D Laycock; Duncan Bell; Adrian Chojnowski
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2012-01-01

9.  Augmented reality patient-specific reconstruction plate design for pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery.

Authors:  Fangyang Shen; Bailiang Chen; Qingshan Guo; Yue Qi; Yue Shen
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  Three-dimensional printing surgical instruments: are we there yet?

Authors:  Timothy M Rankin; Nicholas A Giovinco; Daniel J Cucher; George Watts; Bonnie Hurwitz; David G Armstrong
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 2.192

View more
  16 in total

1.  A study of three-dimensional reconstruction and printing models in two cases of soft tissue sarcoma of the thigh.

Authors:  Linqian Li; Ke Zhang; Renfeng Wang; Yun Liu; Min Zhang; Wenshan Gao; Bao Ren; Xiaozhe Zhou; Shujie Cheng; Jinghua Li
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  A retrospective comparison of the conventional versus three-dimensional printed model-assisted surgery in the treatment of acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Anıl Murat Öztürk; Onur Süer; Suzan Şirintürk; Kemal Aktuğlu; Figen Govsa; Mehmet Asım Özer
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.511

3.  Three-dimension-printed custom-made prosthetic reconstructions: from revision surgery to oncologic reconstructions.

Authors:  Andrea Angelini; Giulia Trovarelli; Antonio Berizzi; Elisa Pala; Anna Breda; Pietro Ruggieri
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Comparison of the feasibility of 3D printing technology in the treatment of pelvic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective comparative studies.

Authors:  Jinwu Wang; Xingyu Wang; Bingzhang Wang; Hua Chen; Leyi Cai; Linzhen Xie; Wenhao Zheng
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 5.  [Update on 3D printing in the surgery of musculoskeletal tumors].

Authors:  Mohamed Omar; Martin Schulze; Nico Bruns; Daniel Kotrych; Georg Gosheger; Max Ettinger
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Creating patient-specific anatomical models for 3D printing and AR/VR: a supplement for the 2018 Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) hands-on course.

Authors:  Nicole Wake; Amy E Alexander; Andy M Christensen; Peter C Liacouras; Maureen Schickel; Todd Pietila; Jane Matsumoto
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2019-12-30

7.  Answer letter concerning "The effect of new preoperative preparation method compared to conventional method in complex acetabular fractures: minimum 2-year follow-up".

Authors:  Pengfei Wang; Yan Zhuang; Kun Zhang
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Augmented reality and three-dimensional plate library-assisted posterior minimally invasive surgery for scapula fracture.

Authors:  Qiang Guo; Xiaoning Li; Yifu Tang; Yuzhao Huang; Ling Luo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Surgical Treatment for Posterior Dislocation of Hip Combined with Acetabular Fractures Using Preoperative Virtual Simulation and Three-Dimensional Printing Model-Assisted Precontoured Plate Fixation Techniques.

Authors:  Yuan-Ta Li; Chun-Chi Hung; Yu-Ching Chou; Jia-En Chen; Chia-Chun Wu; Hsain-Chung Shen; Tsu-Te Yeh
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Clinical study of 3D printed personalized prosthesis in the treatment of bone defect after pelvic tumor resection.

Authors:  Lin Xu; Hao Qin; Jia Tan; Zhilin Cheng; Xiang Luo; Haitao Tan; Wenhua Huang
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.