Literature DB >> 2972539

PL of coliphage lambda: an alternative solution for an efficient promoter.

R Knaus1, H Bujard.   

Abstract

Promoter PL of coliphage lambda is highly active in vivo although it is recognized 15-30 times less efficiently by RNA polymerase when compared with promoters of similar strength. Moreover, it differs significantly from the consensus sequence for Escherichia coli promoters. Sequence variants of PL which are more homologous to consensus promoters bind RNA polymerase with increased efficiency. They are nevertheless significantly reduced in their in vivo strength. High activity can be restored by a downstream sequence of a typical consensus-like promoter. Evidently, such elements are required for the efficient release of a stably bound RNA polymerase into a transcriptional elongation complex. We propose that the functional programme encoded in a promoter sequence can be optimized in alternative ways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2972539      PMCID: PMC457087          DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03150.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  15 in total

1.  A stressed intermediate in the formation of stably initiated RNA chains at the Escherichia coli lac UV5 promoter.

Authors:  D C Straney; D M Crothers
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1987-01-20       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 2.  Regulatory sequences involved in the promotion and termination of RNA transcription.

Authors:  M Rosenberg; D Court
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 16.830

3.  Lac UV5 transcription in vitro. Rate limitation subsequent to formation of an RNA polymerase-DNA complex.

Authors:  J E Stefano; J Gralla
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1979-03-20       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Kinetics of open complex formation between Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and the lac UV5 promoter. Evidence for a sequential mechanism involving three steps.

Authors:  H Buc; W R McClure
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1985-05-21       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Rate-limiting steps in RNA chain initiation.

Authors:  W R McClure
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A procedure for the rapid, large-scall purification of Escherichia coli DNA-dependent RNA polymerase involving Polymin P precipitation and DNA-cellulose chromatography.

Authors:  R R Burgess; J J Jendrisak
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1975-10-21       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Temperature dependence of the rate constants of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase-lambda PR promoter interaction. Assignment of the kinetic steps corresponding to protein conformational change and DNA opening.

Authors:  J H Roe; R R Burgess; M T Record
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1985-08-05       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors.

Authors:  F Sanger; S Nicklen; A R Coulson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Promoter recognition and promoter strength in the Escherichia coli system.

Authors:  M Brunner; H Bujard
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Functional dissection of Escherichia coli promoters: information in the transcribed region is involved in late steps of the overall process.

Authors:  W Kammerer; U Deuschle; R Gentz; H Bujard
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  19 in total

1.  Function-based selection and characterization of base-pair polymorphisms in a promoter of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase-sigma(70).

Authors:  J Xu; B C McCabe; G B Koudelka
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Dissecting the functional program of Escherichia coli promoters: the combined mode of action of Lac repressor and AraC activator.

Authors:  R Lutz; T Lozinski; T Ellinger; H Bujard
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Functionally distinct RNA polymerase binding sites in the phage Mu mom promoter region.

Authors:  V Balke; V Nagaraja; T Gindlesperger; S Hattman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-06-11       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Hierarchies of base pair preferences in the P22 ant promoter.

Authors:  H Moyle; C Waldburger; M M Susskind
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Dynamical analysis on gene activity in the presence of repressors and an interfering promoter.

Authors:  Hiizu Nakanishi; Namiko Mitarai; Kim Sneppen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Promoters largely determine the efficiency of repressor action.

Authors:  M Lanzer; H Bujard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Orthogonal Modular Gene Repression in Escherichia coli Using Engineered CRISPR/Cas9.

Authors:  Andriy Didovyk; Bartłomiej Borek; Jeff Hasty; Lev Tsimring
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 5.110

8.  Overexpression, purification, and characterization of the ADP-ribosyltransferase (gpAlt) of bacteriophage T4: ADP-ribosylation of E. coli RNA polymerase modulates T4 "early" transcription.

Authors:  T Koch; A Raudonikiene; K Wilkens; W Rüger
Journal:  Gene Expr       Date:  1995

9.  The main early and late promoters of Bacillus subtilis phage phi 29 form unstable open complexes with sigma A-RNA polymerase that are stabilized by DNA supercoiling.

Authors:  F Rojo; B Nuez; M Mencía; M Salas
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1993-02-25       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Complex transcriptional control of the streptokinase gene of Streptococcus equisimilis H46A.

Authors:  K Gase; T Ellinger; H Malke
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1995-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.