Literature DB >> 8451193

The main early and late promoters of Bacillus subtilis phage phi 29 form unstable open complexes with sigma A-RNA polymerase that are stabilized by DNA supercoiling.

F Rojo1, B Nuez, M Mencía, M Salas.   

Abstract

Most Escherichia coli promoters studied so far form stable open complexes with sigma 70-RNA polymerase which have relatively long half-lives and, therefore, are resistant to a competitor challenge. A few exceptions are nevertheless known. The analysis of a number of promoters in Bacillus subtilis has suggested that the instability of open complexes formed by the vegetative sigma A-RNA polymerase may be a more general phenomenon than in Escherichia coli. We show that the main early and late promoters from the Bacillus subtilis phage phi 29 form unstable open complexes that are stabilized either by the formation of the first phosphodiester bond between the initiating nucleoside triphosphates or by DNA supercoiling. The functional characteristics of these two strong promoters suggest that they are not optimized for a tight and stable RNA polymerase binding. Their high activity is probably the consequence of the efficiency of further steps leading to the formation of an elongation complex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8451193      PMCID: PMC309227          DOI: 10.1093/nar/21.4.935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  33 in total

1.  A stressed intermediate in the formation of stably initiated RNA chains at the Escherichia coli lac UV5 promoter.

Authors:  D C Straney; D M Crothers
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1987-01-20       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Activation and inhibition of transcription by supercoiling.

Authors:  J G Brahms; O Dargouge; S Brahms; Y Ohara; V Vagner
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1985-02-20       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  In vivo transcription of bacteriophage phi 29 DNA early and late promoter sequences.

Authors:  R P Mellado; I Barthelemy; M Salas
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1986-09-20       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Purification in an active form of the phage phi 29 protein p4 that controls the viral late transcription.

Authors:  I Barthelemy; J M Lázaro; E Méndez; R P Mellado; M Salas
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1987-10-12       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  High-resolution analysis of lac transcription complexes inside cells.

Authors:  J A Borowiec; J D Gralla
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1986-09-09       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Kinetics of open complex formation between Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and the lac UV5 promoter. Evidence for a sequential mechanism involving three steps.

Authors:  H Buc; W R McClure
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1985-05-21       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Supercoiling response of the lac ps promoter in vitro.

Authors:  J A Borowiec; J D Gralla
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1985-08-20       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Phage phi 29 regulatory protein p4 stabilizes the binding of the RNA polymerase to the late promoter in a process involving direct protein-protein contacts.

Authors:  B Nuez; F Rojo; M Salas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Promoter recognition and promoter strength in the Escherichia coli system.

Authors:  M Brunner; H Bujard
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Promoters of Escherichia coli: a hierarchy of in vivo strength indicates alternate structures.

Authors:  U Deuschle; W Kammerer; R Gentz; H Bujard
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  13 in total

1.  Mechanism for the switch of phi29 DNA early to late transcription by regulatory protein p4 and histone-like protein p6.

Authors:  A Camacho; M Salas
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  RNA polymerases from Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli differ in recognition of regulatory signals in vitro.

Authors:  I Artsimovitch; V Svetlov; L Anthony; R R Burgess; R Landick
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  RNA polymerase trafficking in Bacillus subtilis cells.

Authors:  Shu Ishikawa; Taku Oshima; Ken Kurokawa; Yoko Kusuya; Naotake Ogasawara
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  The beta recombinase from the Streptococcal plasmid pSM 19035 represses its own transcription by holding the RNA polymerase at the promoter region.

Authors:  F Rojo; J C Alonso
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-05-25       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 5.  Promoters responsive to DNA bending: a common theme in prokaryotic gene expression.

Authors:  J Pérez-Martín; F Rojo; V de Lorenzo
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1994-06

6.  Supercoil-induced extrusion of a regulatory DNA hairpin.

Authors:  X Dai; M B Greizerstein; K Nadas-Chinni; L B Rothman-Denes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-03-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Instability of Rickettsia prowazekii RNA polymerase-promoter complexes.

Authors:  L P Aniskovitch; H H Winkler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Relevance of UP elements for three strong Bacillus subtilis phage phi29 promoters.

Authors:  Wilfried J J Meijer; Margarita Salas
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Bacteriophage Nf DNA region controlling late transcription: structural and functional homology with bacteriophage phi 29.

Authors:  B Nuez; M Salas
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1993-06-25       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Compilation and analysis of Bacillus subtilis sigma A-dependent promoter sequences: evidence for extended contact between RNA polymerase and upstream promoter DNA.

Authors:  J D Helmann
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1995-07-11       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.