Literature DB >> 29720412

Sexual selection predicts species richness across the animal kingdom.

Tim Janicke1,2, Michael G Ritchie3, Edward H Morrow1, Lucas Marie-Orleach4.   

Abstract

Our improving knowledge of the animal tree of life consistently demonstrates that some taxa diversify more rapidly than others, but what contributes to this variation remains poorly understood. An influential hypothesis proposes that selection arising from competition for mating partners plays a key role in promoting speciation. However, empirical evidence showing a link between proxies of this sexual selection and species richness is equivocal. Here, we collected standardized metrics of sexual selection for a broad range of animal taxa, and found that taxonomic families characterized by stronger sexual selection on males show relatively higher species richness. Thus, our data support the hypothesis that sexual selection elevates species richness. This could occur either by promoting speciation and/or by protecting species against extinction.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Keywords:  Bateman gradient; Bateman principles; diversification; macroevolution; reproductive isolation; species diversity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29720412      PMCID: PMC5966593          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  48 in total

1.  Sympatric speciation by sexual conflict.

Authors:  Sergey Gavrilets; David Waxman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  TimeTree: a public knowledge-base of divergence times among organisms.

Authors:  S Blair Hedges; Joel Dudley; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Homage to Bateman: sex roles predict sex differences in sexual selection.

Authors:  Karoline Fritzsche; Göran Arnqvis
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 4.  The mismeasurement of sexual selection.

Authors:  H Klug; J Heuschele; M D Jennions; H Kokko
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 5.  Sexual conflict and speciation.

Authors:  G A Parker; L Partridge
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Sexual selection protects against extinction.

Authors:  Alyson J Lumley; Łukasz Michalczyk; James J N Kitson; Lewis G Spurgin; Catriona A Morrison; Joanne L Godwin; Matthew E Dickinson; Oliver Y Martin; Brent C Emerson; Tracey Chapman; Matthew J G Gage
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  High opportunity for postcopulatory sexual selection under field conditions.

Authors:  Biz R Turnell; Kerry L Shaw
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  OPPORTUNITY FOR SELECTION: AN APPROPRIATE MEASURE FOR EVALUATING VARIATION IN THE POTENTIAL FOR SELECTION?

Authors:  Jerry F Downhower; Lawrence S Blumer; Luther Brown
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Environmental, demographic, and genetic mating system variation among five geographically distinct dusky pipefish (Syngnathus floridae) populations.

Authors:  Kenyon B Mobley; Adam G Jones
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  The measure and significance of Bateman's principles.

Authors:  Julie M Collet; Rebecca F Dean; Kirsty Worley; David S Richardson; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  8 in total

1.  Sexual selection, body mass and molecular evolution interact to predict diversification in birds.

Authors:  Maider Iglesias-Carrasco; Michael D Jennions; Simon Y W Ho; David A Duchêne
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Experimental evidence for effects of sexual selection on condition-dependent mutation rates.

Authors:  Julian Baur; David Berger
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 15.460

3.  Sexual selection predicts the rate and direction of colour divergence in a large avian radiation.

Authors:  Christopher R Cooney; Zoë K Varley; Lara O Nouri; Christopher J A Moody; Michael D Jardine; Gavin H Thomas
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Dominance effects strengthen premating hybridization barriers between sympatric species of grasshoppers (Acrididae, Orthoptera).

Authors:  Brigitte Gottsberger; Frieder Mayer
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  Three-dimensional geometric morphometric analysis of the skull of Protoceratops andrewsi supports a socio-sexual signalling role for the ceratopsian frill.

Authors:  A Knapp; R J Knell; D W E Hone
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Concerted evolution of metabolic rate, economics of mating, ecology, and pace of life across seed beetles.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Johanna Rönn; Christopher Watson; Julieta Goenaga; Elina Immonen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 12.779

7.  Sexual selection leads to positive allometry but not sexual dimorphism in the expression of horn shape in the blue wildebeest, Connochaetes taurinus.

Authors:  Chloé Gerstenhaber; Andrew Knapp
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-09-11

8.  Machine learning approaches identify male body size as the most accurate predictor of species richness.

Authors:  Klemen Čandek; Urška Pristovšek Čandek; Matjaž Kuntner
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 7.431

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.