Literature DB >> 33529562

Three-dimensional geometric morphometric analysis of the skull of Protoceratops andrewsi supports a socio-sexual signalling role for the ceratopsian frill.

A Knapp1,2, R J Knell2, D W E Hone2.   

Abstract

Socio-sexual selection is predicted to be an important driver of evolution, influencing speciation, extinction and adaptation. The fossil record provides a means of testing these predictions, but detecting its signature from morphological data alone is difficult. There are, nonetheless, some specific patterns of growth and variation which are expected of traits under socio-sexual selection. The distinctive parietal-squamosal frill of ceratopsian dinosaurs has previously been suggested as a socio-sexual display trait, but evidence for this has been limited. Here, we perform a whole-skull shape analysis of an unprecedentedly large sample of specimens of Protoceratops andrewsi using a high-density landmark-based geometric morphometric approach to test four predictions regarding a potential socio-sexual signalling role for the frill. Three predictions-low integration with the rest of the skull, significantly higher rate of change in size and shape during ontogeny, and higher morphological variance than other skull regions-are supported. One prediction, sexual dimorphism in shape, is not supported, suggesting that sexual differences in P. andrewsi are likely to be small. Together, these findings are consistent with mutual mate choice or selection for signalling quality in more general social interactions, and support the hypothesis that the frill functioned as a socio-sexual signal in ceratopsian dinosaurs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dinosauria; evolution; geometric morphometrics; socio-sexual selection

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33529562      PMCID: PMC7893235          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  25 in total

1.  Sexual selection and condition-dependence.

Authors:  R A Johnstone; S A Rands; M R Evans
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 2.411

2.  Multi-modal signal evolution in birds: re-examining a standard proxy for sexual selection.

Authors:  Christopher R Cooney; Hannah E A MacGregor; Nathalie Seddon; Joseph A Tobias
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Sexual selection in prehistoric animals: detection and implications.

Authors:  Robert J Knell; Darren Naish; Joseph L Tomkins; David W E Hone
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  EMMLi: A maximum likelihood approach to the analysis of modularity.

Authors:  Anjali Goswami; John A Finarelli
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Comparison of cranial ontogenetic trajectories among great apes and humans.

Authors:  Philipp Mitteroecker; Philipp Gunz; Markus Bernhard; Katrin Schaefer; Fred L Bookstein
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.895

6.  Reconstructing the past: methods and techniques for the digital restoration of fossils.

Authors:  Stephan Lautenschlager
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Patterns of divergence in the morphology of ceratopsian dinosaurs: sympatry is not a driver of ornament evolution.

Authors:  Andrew Knapp; Robert J Knell; Andrew A Farke; Mark A Loewen; David W E Hone
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Modularity and heterochrony in the evolution of the ceratopsian dinosaur frill.

Authors:  Albert Prieto-Márquez; Joan Garcia-Porta; Shantanu H Joshi; Mark A Norell; Peter J Makovicky
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Meta-analytic evidence that sexual selection improves population fitness.

Authors:  Justin G Cally; Devi Stuart-Fox; Luke Holman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 10.  A fly in a tube: Macroevolutionary expectations for integrated phenotypes.

Authors:  Ryan N Felice; Marcela Randau; Anjali Goswami
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  2 in total

1.  Sexual selection leads to positive allometry but not sexual dimorphism in the expression of horn shape in the blue wildebeest, Connochaetes taurinus.

Authors:  Chloé Gerstenhaber; Andrew Knapp
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-09-11

2.  Complex macroevolutionary dynamics underly the evolution of the crocodyliform skull.

Authors:  Ryan N Felice; Diego Pol; Anjali Goswami
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 5.349

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.