Literature DB >> 26179824

High opportunity for postcopulatory sexual selection under field conditions.

Biz R Turnell1, Kerry L Shaw2.   

Abstract

In polygamous systems, male fitness is determined not only by mating success but also by fertilization success. Despite the growing interest over the past several decades in postcopulatory sexual selection, its relative importance compared to precopulatory sexual selection remains a subject of debate. Here, we use extensive behavioral observations of a seminatural population of Hawaiian swordtail crickets, Laupala cerasina, and molecular paternity assignment to measure the opportunities for pre- and postcopulatory selection. Because postcopulatory selection has the potential to operate at multiple stages, we also separately attribute its effects to factors specific to mating events versus factors specific to males. We find that variance in postcopulatory success is over four times as great as variance in precopulatory success, with most of it unexplained by male mating order or the number of nuptial gifts given. Surprisingly, we also find that male singing effort is under postcopulatory selection, suggesting that males who sing more frequently also have more competitive ejaculates. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that high polyandry levels promote greater relative postcopulatory selection. They also highlight the need for detailed behavioral observations under conditions as natural as possible when measuring mating and reproductive success.
© 2015 The Author(s). Evolution © 2015 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cryptic mate choice; nuptial gifts; opportunity for selection; selection gradients; sperm competition; variance decomposition

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26179824     DOI: 10.1111/evo.12721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  11 in total

1.  Structure of sexual networks determines the operation of sexual selection.

Authors:  Grant C McDonald; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Sexual selection predicts species richness across the animal kingdom.

Authors:  Tim Janicke; Michael G Ritchie; Edward H Morrow; Lucas Marie-Orleach
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Correlated evolution between targets of pre- and postcopulatory sexual selection across squamate reptiles.

Authors:  Ariel F Kahrl; Christian L Cox; Robert M Cox
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Sexual selection gradients change over time in a simultaneous hermaphrodite.

Authors:  Jeroen Na Hoffer; Janine Mariën; Jacintha Ellers; Joris M Koene
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Sex peptide receptor-regulated polyandry modulates the balance of pre- and post-copulatory sexual selection in Drosophila.

Authors:  Juliano Morimoto; Grant C McDonald; Emelia Smith; Damian T Smith; Jennifer C Perry; Tracey Chapman; Tommaso Pizzari; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Nuclear arms races: Experimental evolution for mating success in the mushroom-forming fungus Schizophyllum commune.

Authors:  Bart P S Nieuwenhuis; Duur K Aanen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The repeatable opportunity for selection differs between pre- and postcopulatory fitness components.

Authors:  Lucas Marie-Orleach; Nikolas Vellnow; Lukas Schärer
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2020-12-25

8.  Measuring Pre- and Post-Copulatory Sexual Selection and Their Interaction in Socially Monogamous Species with Extra-Pair Paternity.

Authors:  Emily Rebecca Alison Cramer
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 6.600

9.  Post-insemination selection dominates pre-insemination selection in driving rapid evolution of male competitive ability.

Authors:  Katja R Kasimatis; Megan J Moerdyk-Schauwecker; Ruben Lancaster; Alexander Smith; John H Willis; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Experimental evolution under hyper-promiscuity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Jennifer C Perry; Richa Joag; David J Hosken; Nina Wedell; Jacek Radwan; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.