Literature DB >> 2971912

Comparison of lumbar paravertebral EMG patterns in chronic low back pain patients and non-patient controls.

David K Ahern1, Michael J Follick, James R Council, Nancy Laser-Wolston, Henry Litchman.   

Abstract

According to myogenic models that relate abnormal EMG patterns to the experience of pain, lumbar paravertebral muscle activity has been considered to play an important role in chronic low back pain. In the present study, 40 chronic low back pain patients and 40 matched non-patient controls were compared on lumbar paravertebral EMG during mechanically stabilized static and dynamic postures. Differences between groups in lumbar curvature and spinal range of motion were determined using a dual goniometer technique. Although the two groups did not differ on absolute levels of EMG during quiet standing, significant differences were found for EMG patterns during dynamic postures. In addition, most patients did not show the flexion-relaxation response or the expected pattern of EMG responses during trunk rotation, most likely because of restricted range of motion and/or compensatory posturing. These findings provide support for the biomechanical model of chronic pain and indicate the need for further research pertaining to pain behavior and movement-related lumbar muscle activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2971912     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90160-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  28 in total

1.  Correcting abnormal flexion-relaxation in chronic lumbar pain: responsiveness to a new biofeedback training protocol.

Authors:  Randy Neblett; Tom G Mayer; Emily Brede; Robert J Gatchel
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.442

2.  A time series analysis of the relationship between ambulatory EMG, pain, and stress in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  M E Geisser; M E Robinson; C Richardson
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1995-12

Review 3.  Evidence of splinting in low back pain? A systematic review of perturbation studies.

Authors:  Maarten R Prins; Mariëtte Griffioen; Thom T J Veeger; Henri Kiers; Onno G Meijer; Peter van der Wurff; Sjoerd M Bruijn; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Electromyographic recordings of paraspinal muscles: variations related to subcutaneous tissue thickness.

Authors:  M A Hemingway; H J Biedermann; J Inglis
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1995-03

5.  Understanding paraspinal muscle dysfunction in low back pain: a way forward?

Authors:  R G Cooper
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Effects of chronic low back pain on trunk coordination and back muscle activity during walking: changes in motor control.

Authors:  Claudine J C Lamoth; Onno G Meijer; Andreas Daffertshofer; Paul I J M Wuisman; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Voluntary and reflex control of human back muscles during induced pain.

Authors:  M Zedka; A Prochazka; B Knight; D Gillard; M Gauthier
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  What is the best surface EMG measure of lumbar flexion-relaxation for distinguishing chronic low back pain patients from pain-free controls?

Authors:  Randy Neblett; Emily Brede; Tom G Mayer; Robert J Gatchel
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.442

9.  Pocket-size, portable surface EMG device in the differentiation of low back pain patients.

Authors:  P Jalovaara; T Niinimäki; H Vanharanta
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Effect of load level and muscle pain intensity on the motor control of elbow-flexion movements.

Authors:  Ulysses Fernandes Ervilha; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Marcos Duarte; Thomas Graven-Nielsen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-03-26       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.