Literature DB >> 23328325

What is the best surface EMG measure of lumbar flexion-relaxation for distinguishing chronic low back pain patients from pain-free controls?

Randy Neblett1, Emily Brede, Tom G Mayer, Robert J Gatchel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Lumbar flexion-relaxation (FR) is a well-known phenomenon that can reliably be seen in normal subjects but not in most chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. The purpose of this study was to determine which surface electromyographic (SEMG) measures of FR best distinguish CLBP patients from pain-free control subjects. Standing SEMG and lumbar flexion range of motion (ROM) were also evaluated.
METHODS: A cohort of 218 CLBP patients, who were admitted to a functional restoration program, received a standardized SEMG and ROM assessment during standing trunk flexion and reextension. An asymptomatic control group of 30 nonpatients received an identical assessment. Both groups were compared on 8 separate SEMG and 3 flexion ROM measures.
RESULTS: A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine how well each measure distinguished between the CLBP patients and the pain-free control subjects. All SEMG measures of FR performed acceptably. Between 79% and 82% of patients, and 83% and 100% of controls were correctly classified. Standing SEMG performed less well. Gross flexion ROM was the best single classification measure tested, correctly classifying 88% of patients and 83% of controls. A series of discriminant analyses found that certain combinations of SEMG and ROM performed slightly better than gross ROM alone for correctly classifying the 2 subjects groups. DISCUSSION: Because all SEMG measures of FR performed acceptably, the determination of which SEMG measure of FR is "best" is largely dependent on one's specific purpose. In addition, ROM measures were found to be important components of the FR assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23328325      PMCID: PMC3594078          DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318267252d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.442


  34 in total

1.  Changes in the flexion relaxation response following an exercise intervention.

Authors:  Paul Marshall; Bernadette Murphy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Correcting abnormal flexion-relaxation in chronic lumbar pain: responsiveness to a new biofeedback training protocol.

Authors:  Randy Neblett; Tom G Mayer; Emily Brede; Robert J Gatchel
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.442

3.  Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance.

Authors:  Johan W S Vlaeyen; Ank M J Kole-Snijders; Ruben G B Boeren; H van Eek
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Chronic low back pain assessment using surface electromyography.

Authors:  C Ambroz; A Scott; A Ambroz; E O Talbott
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.162

5.  Patterns of muscular activity during movement in patients with chronic low-back pain.

Authors:  A Nouwen; P F Van Akkerveeken; J M Versloot
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Posture related to myoelectric silence of erectores spinae during trunk flexion.

Authors:  V Kippers; A W Parker
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Toward more accurate use of the Beck Depression Inventory with chronic back pain patients.

Authors:  A L Wesley; R J Gatchel; J P Garofalo; P B Polatin
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.442

8.  Use of noninvasive techniques for quantification of spinal range-of-motion in normal subjects and chronic low-back dysfunction patients.

Authors:  T G Mayer; A F Tencer; S Kristoferson; V Mooney
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Muscle activation changes after exercise rehabilitation for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Paul W Marshall; Bernadette A Murphy
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Correlation of objective measure of trunk motion and muscle function with low-back disability ratings.

Authors:  J J Triano; A B Schultz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  9 in total

1.  Diagnostic value of trunk flexion-extension testing in old chronic low back pain patients.

Authors:  Thomas Kienbacher; Elisabeth Fehrmann; Richard Habenicht; Christian Oeffel; Josef Kollmitzer; Patrick Mair; Gerold Ebenbichler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Novel Electromyographic Protocols Using Axial Rotation and Cervical Flexion-Relaxation for the Assessment of Subjects With Neck Pain: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  James W DeVocht; Kalyani Gudavalli; Maruti R Gudavalli; Ting Xia
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-05-20

3.  Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis Show an Altered Flexion/Relaxation Phenomenon.

Authors:  I Concepción Aranda-Valera; Juan Luis Garrido-Castro; Alfonso Martínez-Galisteo; José Peña-Amaro; Cristina González-Navas; Antonio Cuesta-Vargas; Luis Jiménez-Reina; Eduardo Collantes-Estévez; Clementina López-Medina
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-29

4.  Age and gender related neuromuscular changes in trunk flexion-extension.

Authors:  Thomas Kienbacher; Birgit Paul; Richard Habenicht; Christian Starek; Markus Wolf; Josef Kollmitzer; Patrick Mair; Gerold Ebenbichler
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  Age and gender related neuromuscular pattern during trunk flexion-extension in chronic low back pain patients.

Authors:  Thomas Kienbacher; Elisabeth Fehrmann; Richard Habenicht; Daniela Koller; Christian Oeffel; Josef Kollmitzer; Patrick Mair; Gerold Ebenbichler
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Effects of cognitive loading on lumbar flexion relaxation phenomenon in healthy people.

Authors:  Mohammad Pouretezad; Reza Salehi; Hossein Negahban; Mohammad Jafar Shaterzaedeh Yazdi; Mohammad Mehravar
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2018-06-12

7.  Validation of mDurance, A Wearable Surface Electromyography System for Muscle Activity Assessment.

Authors:  Alejandro Molina-Molina; Emilio J Ruiz-Malagón; Francisco Carrillo-Pérez; Luis E Roche-Seruendo; Miguel Damas; Oresti Banos; Felipe García-Pinillos
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Temporal Associations Between Pain-Related Factors and Abnormal Muscle Activities in a Patient with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Cross-Lag Correlation Analysis of a Single Case.

Authors:  Hayato Shigetoh; Yuki Nishi; Michihiro Osumi; Shu Morioka
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.133

9.  A systematic review of movement and muscular activity biomarkers to discriminate non-specific chronic low back pain patients from an asymptomatic population.

Authors:  Florent Moissenet; Kevin Rose-Dulcina; Stéphane Armand; Stéphane Genevay
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.