Literature DB >> 8528778

Pocket-size, portable surface EMG device in the differentiation of low back pain patients.

P Jalovaara1, T Niinimäki, H Vanharanta.   

Abstract

The relevance of surface EMG of the paraspinal muscles measured by a portable, pocket-size device with a special amplifier was evaluated in different low back pain groups. Patients with only local low back pain had significantly higher EMG activities than those with unilateral radiating pain without verified disc herniation, those with verified disc herniation, and controls, but there were no differences between the latter three groups. Pain clearly modified paravertebral muscle activity, as the patients experiencing pain during the recording showed significantly higher EMG activities than those with no pain. It is concluded that surface EMG is a valid tool for indirectly assessing pain in low back pain patients but not for classification into different diagnostic groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8528778     DOI: 10.1007/bf00303412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  7 in total

1.  Lumbar iEMG during isotonic exercise: chronic low back pain patients versus controls.

Authors:  M E Robinson; J E Cassisi; P D O'Connor; M MacMillan
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1992-03

2.  Autologous nucleus pulposus induces neurophysiologic and histologic changes in porcine cauda equina nerve roots.

Authors:  K Olmarker; B Rydevik; C Nordborg
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Comparative analysis of paraspinal and frontalis EMG, heart rate and skin conductance in chronic low back pain patients and normals to various postures and stress.

Authors:  G A Collins; M J Cohen; B D Naliboff; S L Schandler
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1982

4.  Electromyographic recordings of 5 types of low back pain subjects and non-pain controls in different positions.

Authors:  John G Arena; Richard A Sherman; Glenda M Bruno; Timothy R Young
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Disc deterioration in low-back syndromes. A prospective, multi-center CT/discography study.

Authors:  H Vanharanta; R D Guyer; D D Ohnmeiss; W J Stith; B L Sachs; C Aprill; M Spivey; R F Rashbaum; S H Hochschuler; T Videman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Comparison of lumbar paravertebral EMG patterns in chronic low back pain patients and non-patient controls.

Authors:  David K Ahern; Michael J Follick; James R Council; Nancy Laser-Wolston; Henry Litchman
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Paralumbar muscle activity in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  E Kravitz; M E Moore; A Glaros
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 3.966

  7 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  A vision for the future of wearable sensors in spine care and its challenges: narrative review.

Authors:  Paul W Hodges; Wolbert van den Hoorn
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-03

2.  The value of electromyography of the lumbar paraspinal muscles in discriminating between chronic-low-back-pain sufferers and normal subjects.

Authors:  Anthony R Humphrey; Antoni V F Nargol; Anthony P C Jones; Amy A Ratcliffe; Charles G Greenough
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-11-12       Impact factor: 3.134

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.