Literature DB >> 29717467

Research Ethics: Researchers Consider How Best to Prevent Misconduct in Research in Malaysian Higher Learning Institutions Through Ethics Education.

Angelina Patrick Olesen1, Latifah Amin2, Zurina Mahadi1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to encourage and highlight discussion on how to improve the teaching of research ethics in institutions of higher education in Malaysia. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with 21 academics in a research-intensive university in Malaysia, interviewees agreed on the importance of emphasizing the subject of research ethics among students, as well as academics or researchers. This study reveals that participants felt that there is an urgent need to improve the current awareness and knowledge of issues related to misconduct in research among students and academics. The results of this study indicate a need for better teaching on the subject of research ethics in order to prevent misconduct in research. Finally, it concludes with suggestions that there should be a clear definition of research misconduct, to include consequences when engaging in misconduct; a separate research ethics syllabus for pure and social sciences should be conducted; research ethics should be implemented as a core subject, and there should be an early intervention and continuous learning of research ethics, with an emphasis on ethics training.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuous learning; Core subject; Early intervention; Empowering participants; Malaysia; Research ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29717467     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-018-0054-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  20 in total

1.  Are ethics committee members competent to consult?

Authors:  D Hoffmann; A Tarzian; J A O'Neil
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.718

2.  Responsible conduct of research is all well and good.

Authors:  Kenneth A Richman
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  Teaching old dogs new tricks: continuing education in research ethics.

Authors:  Richard R Sharp
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  Fostering integrity in research: definitions, current knowledge, and future directions.

Authors:  Nicholas H Steneck
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Academic and research misconduct in the PhD: issues for students and supervisors.

Authors:  Theresa Mitchell; Jude Carroll
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 3.442

6.  Research Integrity Practices from the Perspective of Early-Career Researchers.

Authors:  Snežana B Krstić
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications.

Authors:  Ferric C Fang; R Grant Steen; Arturo Casadevall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A Sensemaking Approach to Ethics Training for Scientists: Preliminary Evidence of Training Effectiveness.

Authors:  Michael D Mumford; Shane Connelly; Ryan P Brown; Stephen T Murphy; Jason H Hill; Alison L Antes; Ethan P Waples; Lynn D Devenport
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2008-10-01

Review 9.  Curricular approaches to research ethics training for psychiatric investigators.

Authors:  Donna T Chen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-05-27       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Research misconduct in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Joseph Ana; Tracey Koehlmoos; Richard Smith; Lijing L Yan
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.