Literature DB >> 25344843

Research Integrity Practices from the Perspective of Early-Career Researchers.

Snežana B Krstić1.   

Abstract

Unavailability of published data and studies focused on young researchers in Europe and research integrity issues reveals that clear understanding and stance on this subject within European area is lacking. Our study provides information on attitudes and experiences of European researchers at early career stages (doctoral and postdoctoral level), based on a limited sample of respondents (n = 27). The study provides both quantitative and qualitative results for the examined issues. The data suggest that awareness and interest of the younger researchers surveyed in research integrity issues is high, however, it is often based on self-initiatives, with many of the respondents not having adequate training or any possibility to obtain it. Our attitude survey conducted within the European Council of Doctoral Candidates and Junior Researchers indicates that only 22 % of respondents had an opportunity to obtain relevant training (significantly less than in a study conducted in the U.S.), and that only one third believed that institutions and supervisors regularly paid attention to it. Further, we noted certain differences between disciplines. The study also reveals that many younger researchers felt they faced problems due to the misconduct of their senior colleagues and the existing institutional culture. The results of the study indicate a need for better prevention mechanisms, training and raising awareness activities. Preferably, junior researchers should be given an active role in shaping the integrity culture. It should be noted that the presented results should be considered in the context of the limitations stemming from the small-scale survey. This paper encourages further research activities on research integrity practices to provide stronger evidence on the attitudes and experiences of young researchers in Europe and other parts of the world.

Keywords:  Doctoral training; Early-career researchers; Research integrity; Responsible conduct of research (RCR); Responsible research and innovation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25344843     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-014-9607-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  18 in total

1.  Mentors, advisors and supervisors: their role in teaching responsible research conduct.

Authors:  S J Bird
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Scientific dishonesty--questionnaire to doctoral students in Sweden.

Authors:  Tore Nilstun; Rurik Löfmark; Anita Lundqvist
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Credit where credit is due? Regulation, research integrity and the attribution of authorship in the health sciences.

Authors:  Jackie M Street; Wendy A Rogers; Mark Israel; Annette J Braunack-Mayer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  The scandal of unfair behaviour of senior faculty.

Authors:  E J Wagena
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Scientists behaving badly.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; Melissa S Anderson; Raymond de Vries
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Academic and research misconduct in the PhD: issues for students and supervisors.

Authors:  Theresa Mitchell; Jude Carroll
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 3.442

7.  Deceit and fraud in medical research.

Authors:  Usman Jaffer; Alan E P Cameron
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 6.071

8.  What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists' misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-funded scientists.

Authors:  Melissa S Anderson; Aaron S Horn; Kelly R Risbey; Emily A Ronning; Raymond De Vries; Brian C Martinson
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Mentoring and research misconduct: an analysis of research mentoring in closed ORI cases.

Authors:  David E Wright; Sandra L Titus; Jered B Cornelison
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  Ensuring PhD development of responsible conduct of research behaviors: who's responsible?

Authors:  Sandra L Titus; Janice M Ballou
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 3.525

View more
  9 in total

1.  In Their Own Words: Research Misconduct from the Perspective of Researchers in Malaysian Universities.

Authors:  Angelina P Olesen; Latifah Amin; Zurina Mahadi
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Research Ethics: Researchers Consider How Best to Prevent Misconduct in Research in Malaysian Higher Learning Institutions Through Ethics Education.

Authors:  Angelina Patrick Olesen; Latifah Amin; Zurina Mahadi
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Plagiarism, Cheating and Research Integrity: Case Studies from a Masters Program in Peru.

Authors:  Andres M Carnero; Percy Mayta-Tristan; Kelika A Konda; Edward Mezones-Holguin; Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz; German F Alvarado; Carlos Canelo-Aybar; Jorge L Maguiña; Eddy R Segura; Antonio M Quispe; Edward S Smith; Angela M Bayer; Andres G Lescano
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Reverse mentoring to enhance research integrity climate.

Authors:  Daniel Pizzolato; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2022-06-17

5.  Authorship Issues and Conflict in the U.S. Academic Chemical Community.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Seeman; Mark C House
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  How do researchers acquire and develop notions of research integrity? A qualitative study among biomedical researchers in Switzerland.

Authors:  Priya Satalkar; David Shaw
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Expanding Research Integrity: A Cultural-Practice Perspective.

Authors:  Govert Valkenburg; Guus Dix; Joeri Tijdink; Sarah de Rijcke
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Stakeholders' perspectives on research integrity training practices: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Daniel Pizzolato; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Research Integrity Among PhD Students at the Faculty of Medicine: A Comparison of Three Scandinavian Universities.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann; Lone Bredahl Jensen; Mette Brandt Eriksen; Gert Helgesson; Niklas Juth; Søren Holm
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 1.742

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.