| Literature DB >> 29715308 |
Jinyan Wei1, Jianhong Zhao1, Xueling Zhang1, Dan Wang1, Wenjuan Zhang1, Zhiping Wang2, Junlin Zhou1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To discuss the dual energy spectral computer tomography (CT) imaging features of the pathological grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and the correlation between spectral CT imaging features and pathology.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29715308 PMCID: PMC5929552 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195699
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The optimal threshold of quantitative parameters to diagnose the grading of ccRCC.
| Group | AUC | Threshold | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CP | ||||
| 70keV | 0.857 | 109.24 | 87.1(30) | 87.5 (24) |
| NIC | 0.771 | 0.35 | 83.9 (29) | 75.0 (20) |
| Slope | 0.885 | 4.03 | 90.3 (32) | 87.5(24) |
| PP | ||||
| 70keV | 0.675 | 107.98 | 45.2 (16) | 93.7 (25) |
| NIC | 0.710 | 0.85 | 58.1 (20) | 87.5 (24) |
| slope | 0.693 | 3.65 | 58.1 (20) | 87.5 (24) |
NIC, normalized iodine concentration; CP, cortex phase; PP, parenchyma phase. Threshold 70keV are cited in Hounsfield (HU). Threshold NIC in CP and PP are represented as mg/mL. Sensitivity values are demonstrated as %. Data in parentheses are numbers of low-grade ccRCC lesions (n = 35) used to calculate percentages. Specificity values are cited as %. Data in parentheses are numbers of low-grade ccRCC lesions (n = 27) used to calculate percentages.
Quantitative assessment of different pathological grading of ccRCC with CT spectral imaging.
| Group | CP | PP | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| low grade | high grade | low grade | high grade | |||
| 70keV (HU) | 151.89±37.38 | 108.40±17.82 | 0.001 | 100.34±18.52 | 90.57±10.85 | 0.134 |
| NIC | 0.47±0.17 | 0.31±0.11 | 0.043 | 0.83±0.22 | 0.68±0.11 | 0.048 |
| Slope | 5.99±1.71 | 3.71±0.85 | <0.001 | 3.51±0.83 | 2.57±0.59 | 0.017 |
| Water Concentration Ratio | 1.02±0.01 | 1.01±0.01 | 0.493 | 1.00±0.01 | 1.00±0.01 | 0.781 |
NIC, normalized iodine concentration, NIC was calculated as NIC = IClesion/ICaorta, where IClesion and ICaorta are the iodine levels in the lesions and the aorta; Slope was calculated as slope = (CT40keV-CT70keV)/30, where CT40keV and CT70keV are the CT attenuation values of the tumors on 40 keV and 70 keV monochromatic images; CP, cortex phase; PP, parenchyma phase. Data are mean±standard deviation P<0.05 indicates a statistically significant difference between low-grade and high-grade ccRCC.
Qualitative assessment with monochromatic image of different pathological ccRCC during CP and PP.
| CT signs | A (35) | B (27) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | ||||
| Shape | regular | 27 | 77.1 | 8 | 29.6 | 16.362 | <0.001 |
| no | 8 | 22.9 | 19 | 70.4 | |||
| Calcification | yes | 11 | 31.4 | 4 | 14.8 | 3.981 | 0.137 |
| no | 24 | 68.6 | 23 | 85.2 | |||
| Pseudocapsule | yes | 26 | 74.3 | 7 | 25.9 | 18.258 | <0.001 |
| no | 9 | 25.7 | 20 | 74.1 | |||
| Necrosis | yes | 17 | 48.6 | 24 | 88.9 | 11.467 | 0.003 |
| no | 18 | 51.4 | 3 | 11.1 | |||
| Enhancement | Homogeneous | 10 | 28.6 | 3 | 11.1 | 3.004 | 0.223 |
| no | 25 | 71.4 | 24 | 88.9 | |||
Data are numbers of lesions and percentages. P<0.05 indicates a statistically significant difference between low-grade ccRCC and high-grade ccRCC.