Literature DB >> 33568946

Multiphase Contrast-Enhanced CT-Based Machine Learning Models to Predict the Fuhrman Nuclear Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Shengsheng Lai1, Lei Sun2, Jialiang Wu3, Ruili Wei4, Shiwei Luo4, Wenshuang Ding5, Xilong Liu6, Ruimeng Yang4, Xin Zhen2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the predictive performance of different machine learning models for the discrimination of low and high nuclear grade clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) by using multiphase computed tomography (CT)-based radiomic features.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 137 consecutive patients with pathologically proven ccRCC (including 96 low-grade [grade 1 or 2] and 41 high-grade [grade 3 or 4] ccRCC) from January 2011 to January 2019 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Target region of interest (ROI) delineation followed by texture extraction was performed on a representative slice with the largest section of the tumor on the four-phase (unenhanced phase [UP], corticomedullary phase [CMP], nephrographic phase [NP] and excretory phase [EP]) CT images. Fifteen concatenations of the four-phase features were fed into 176 classification models (built with 8 classifiers and 22 feature selection methods), the classification performances of the 2640 resultant discriminative models were compared, and the top-ranked features were analyzed.
RESULTS: Image features extracted from the unenhanced phase (UP) CT images demonstrated a dominant classification performance over features from the other three phases. The discriminative model "Bagging + CMIM" achieved the highest classification AUC of 0.75. The top-ranked features from the UP included one shape-based feature and five first-order statistical features.
CONCLUSION: Image features extracted from the UP are more effective than other CT phases in differentiating low and high nuclear grade ccRCC based on machine learning-based classification modeling.
© 2021 Lai et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fuhrman nuclear grade; classification; clear cell renal cell carcinoma; computed tomography; machine learning

Year:  2021        PMID: 33568946      PMCID: PMC7869703          DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S290327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Manag Res        ISSN: 1179-1322            Impact factor:   3.989


  29 in total

Review 1.  Grading systems in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Giacomo Novara; Guido Martignoni; Walter Artibani; Vincenzo Ficarra
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Incompletely characterized incidental renal masses: emerging data support conservative management.

Authors:  Stuart G Silverman; Gary M Israel; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  CT texture analysis in the differentiation of major renal cell carcinoma subtypes and correlation with Fuhrman grade.

Authors:  Yu Deng; Erik Soule; Aster Samuel; Sakhi Shah; Enming Cui; Michael Asare-Sawiri; Chandru Sundaram; Chandana Lall; Kumaresan Sandrasegaran
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Renal cell carcinoma: applicability of the apparent coefficient of the diffusion-weighted estimated by MRI for improving their differential diagnosis, histologic subtyping, and differentiation grade.

Authors:  Yulian Mytsyk; Ihor Dutka; Yuriy Borys; Iryna Komnatska; Iryna Shatynska-Mytsyk; Ammad Ahmad Farooqi; Katarina Gazdikova; Martin Caprnda; Luis Rodrigo; Peter Kruzliak
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: CT-based radiomics features for the prediction of Fuhrman grade.

Authors:  Jun Shu; Yongqiang Tang; Jingjing Cui; Ruwu Yang; Xiaoli Meng; Zhengting Cai; Jingsong Zhang; Wanni Xu; Didi Wen; Hong Yin
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  CT-based machine learning model to predict the Fuhrman nuclear grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Fan Lin; En-Ming Cui; Yi Lei; Liang-Ping Luo
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2019-07

Review 7.  Renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Brian I Rini; Steven C Campbell; Bernard Escudier
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Diagnostic Performance of DWI for Differentiating High- From Low-Grade Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sungmin Woo; Chong Hyun Suh; Sang Youn Kim; Jeong Yeon Cho; Seung Hyup Kim
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Tumor grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma assessed by contrast-enhanced computed tomography.

Authors:  Kousei Ishigami; Leandro V Leite; Marius G Pakalniskis; Daniel K Lee; Danniele G Holanda; David M Kuehn
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-11-26

10.  CT texture analysis: a potential tool for predicting the Fuhrman grade of clear-cell renal carcinoma.

Authors:  Zhan Feng; Qijun Shen; Ying Li; Zhengyu Hu
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.909

View more
  2 in total

1.  A CT-Based Radiomics Nomogram Integrated With Clinic-Radiological Features for Preoperatively Predicting WHO/ISUP Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yingjie Xv; Fajin Lv; Haoming Guo; Zhaojun Liu; Di Luo; Jing Liu; Xin Gou; Weiyang He; Mingzhao Xiao; Yineng Zheng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  CT-based transformer model for non-invasively predicting the Fuhrman nuclear grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Meiyi Yang; Xiaopeng He; Lifeng Xu; Minghui Liu; Jiali Deng; Xuan Cheng; Yi Wei; Qian Li; Shang Wan; Feng Zhang; Lei Wu; Xiaomin Wang; Bin Song; Ming Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 5.738

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.