Literature DB >> 29707988

Purification processes of xenogeneic bone substitutes and their impact on tissue reactions and regeneration.

Zeljka Perić Kačarević1, Faraz Kavehei2, Alireza Houshmand3, Jörg Franke4, Ralf Smeets5, Denis Rimashevskiy6, Sabine Wenisch7, Reinhard Schnettler8, Ole Jung5, Mike Barbeck5.   

Abstract

Xenogeneic bone substitute materials are widely used in oral implantology. Prior to their clinical use, purification of the former bone tissue has to be conducted to ensure the removal of immunogenic components and pathogens. Different physicochemical methods are applied for purification of the donor tissue, and temperature treatment is one of these methods. Differences in these methods and especially the application of different temperatures for purification may lead to different material characteristics, which may influence the tissue reactions to these materials and the related (bone) healing process. However, little is known about the different material characteristics and their influences on the healing process. Thus, the aim of this mini-review is to summarize the preparation processes and the related material characteristics, safety aspects, tissue reactions, resorbability and preclinical and clinical data of two widely used xenogeneic bone substitutes that mainly differ in the temperature treatment: sintered (cerabone®) and non-sintered (Bio-Oss®) bovine-bone materials. Based on the summarized data from the literature, a connection between the material-induced tissue reactions and the consequences for the healing processes are presented with the aim of translation into their clinical application.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone substitute; implant bed vascularization; inflammation; multinucleated giant cells; xenograft

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29707988     DOI: 10.1177/0391398818771530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Artif Organs        ISSN: 0391-3988            Impact factor:   1.595


  16 in total

Review 1.  Specialized Histological and Histomorphometrical Analytical Methods for Biocompatibility Testing of Biomaterials for Maxillofacial Surgery in (Pre-) Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Carolin Lindner; Annica PrÖhl; Ole Jung; Mike Barbeck; Manuel Abels; Tom LÖffler; Milijana Batinic
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Comparison of Material-mediated Bone Regeneration Capacities of Sintered and Non-sintered Xenogeneic Bone Substitutes via 2D and 3D Data.

Authors:  Eleni Kapogianni; Mike Barbeck; Tim Fienitz; Daniel Rothamel; Ole Jung; Aylin Arslan; Lennart Kuhnel; Xin Xiong; Rumen Krastev; Reinhard E. Friedrich; Reinhard Schnettler
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  In Vivo Analysis of the Immune Response to Strontium- and Copper-doped Bioglass.

Authors:  Denis Rimashevskiy; Franziska Schmidt; Mike Barbeck; Said Alkildani; Armando Mandlule; Milena Radenković; Stevo Najman; Sanja Stojanović; Ole Jung; Yanru Ren; Baoyi Cai; Oliver Görke
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 4.  Manufacturing artificial bone allografts: a perspective.

Authors:  Emma Steijvers; Armaan Ghei; Zhidao Xia
Journal:  Biomater Transl       Date:  2022-03-28

5.  The assessment of xenogeneic bone immunotoxicity and risk management study.

Authors:  Xiaoxia Sun; Chenghu Liu; Yanping Shi; Chunling Li; Likui Sun; Li Hou; Xin Wang
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Activation of Human Osteoblasts via Different Bovine Bone Substitute Materials With and Without Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin in vitro.

Authors:  Solomiya Kyyak; Sebastian Blatt; Eik Schiegnitz; Diana Heimes; Henning Staedt; Daniel G E Thiem; Keyvan Sagheb; Bilal Al-Nawas; Peer W Kämmerer
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-02-17

7.  The Influence of Hyaluronic Acid Biofunctionalization of a Bovine Bone Substitute on Osteoblast Activity In Vitro.

Authors:  Solomiya Kyyak; Andreas Pabst; Diana Heimes; Peer W Kämmerer
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 8.  Synthetic Injectable Biomaterials for Alveolar Bone Regeneration in Animal and Human Studies.

Authors:  Matej Tomas; Marija Čandrlić; Martina Juzbašić; Zrinka Ivanišević; Nikola Matijević; Aleksandar Včev; Olga Cvijanović Peloza; Marko Matijević; Željka Perić Kačarević
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 9.  Additive Manufacturing for Guided Bone Regeneration: A Perspective for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation.

Authors:  Patrick Rider; Željka Perić Kačarević; Said Alkildani; Sujith Retnasingh; Reinhard Schnettler; Mike Barbeck
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Balancing Purification and Ultrastructure of Naturally Derived Bone Blocks for Bone Regeneration: Report of the Purification Effort of Two Bone Blocks.

Authors:  Mike Barbeck; Ole Jung; Xin Xiong; Rumen Krastev; Tadas Korzinskas; Stevo Najman; Milena Radenković; Nils Wegner; Marina Knyazeva; Frank Walther
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.