Literature DB >> 34073551

Synthetic Injectable Biomaterials for Alveolar Bone Regeneration in Animal and Human Studies.

Matej Tomas1,2, Marija Čandrlić1,3, Martina Juzbašić1,2, Zrinka Ivanišević1, Nikola Matijević1,2, Aleksandar Včev4, Olga Cvijanović Peloza5, Marko Matijević1, Željka Perić Kačarević6.   

Abstract

After tooth extraction, the alveolar ridge undergoes dimensional changes. Different bone regeneration biomaterials are used to reduce bone loss. The aim of this article was to systematically review the literature on the effect of injectable synthetic biomaterials and their advantages and disadvantages for new bone formation in the maxilla and mandible in animals and humans. A literature search was conducted in November 2020 via MEDLINE PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase. Of the 501 records screened, abstract analysis was performed on 49 articles, resulting in 21 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Animal studies have shown heterogeneity in terms of animal models, follow-up time, composition of the injectable biomaterial, and different outcome variables such as bone-implant contact, newly formed bone, and peri-implant bone density. Heterogeneity has also been demonstrated by human studies. The following outcomes were observed: newly formed bone, connective tissue, residual injectable bone graft substitute, radiographic density, residual bone height, and different follow-up periods. Further studies, especially in humans, based on the histological and biomechanical properties of the injectable delivery form, are needed to draw more concrete conclusions that will contribute to a better understanding of the benefits of this type of biomaterials and their role in bone regeneration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alloplastic biomaterials; bone regeneration; injectable synthetic bone graft

Year:  2021        PMID: 34073551     DOI: 10.3390/ma14112858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Materials (Basel)        ISSN: 1996-1944            Impact factor:   3.623


  32 in total

1.  Deproteinated bovine bone vs. beta-tricalcium phosphate as bone graft substitutes: histomorphometric longitudinal study in the rabbit cranial vault.

Authors:  Arturo Martinez; Oscar Balboa; Iria Gasamans; Xose Luis Otero-Cepeda; Francisco Guitian
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 5.977

2.  Bone response to fast-degrading, injectable calcium phosphate cements containing PLGA microparticles.

Authors:  Rosa P Félix Lanao; Sander C G Leeuwenburgh; Joop G C Wolke; John A Jansen
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Effect of bone swaging with calcium phosphate bone cement on periodontal regeneration in dogs.

Authors:  Yoshinori Shirakata; Katsuyoshi Taniyama; Takehiko Yoshimoto; Naoshi Takeuchi; Kazuyuki Noguchi
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2011-08-24

4.  Treatment of periodontal defects in dogs using an injectable composite hydrogel/biphasic calcium phosphate.

Authors:  Xavier Struillou; Hervé Boutigny; Zahi Badran; Borhane H Fellah; Olivier Gauthier; Sophie Sourice; Paul Pilet; Thierry Rouillon; Pierre Layrolle; Pierre Weiss; Assem Soueidan
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Periodontal regeneration using an injectable bone cement combined with BMP-2 or FGF-2.

Authors:  Daniël A W Oortgiesen; X Frank Walboomers; Antonius L J J Bronckers; Gert J Meijer; John A Jansen
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.963

6.  A new injectable calcium phosphate biomaterial for immediate bone filling of extraction sockets: a preliminary study in dogs.

Authors:  O Gauthier; D Boix; G Grimandi; E Aguado; J M Bouler; P Weiss; G Daculsi
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.993

7.  Bone healing and graft resorption of autograft, anorganic bovine bone and beta-tricalcium phosphate. A histologic and histomorphometric study in the mandibles of minipigs.

Authors:  Simon Storgård Jensen; Nina Broggini; Erik Hjørting-Hansen; Robert Schenk; Daniel Buser
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.977

8.  Histological results after maxillary sinus augmentation with Straumann® BoneCeramic, Bio-Oss®, Puros®, and autologous bone. A randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Christian Martin Schmitt; Hendrik Doering; Thomas Schmidt; Rainer Lutz; Friedrich Wilhelm Neukam; Karl Andreas Schlegel
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  Ridge preservation with the use of deproteinized bovine bone mineral.

Authors:  Jan Lindhe; Denis Cecchinato; Mauro Donati; Cristiano Tomasi; Birgitta Liljenberg
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 5.977

10.  Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening.

Authors:  Bartosz Maska; Guo-Hao Lin; Abdullah Othman; Shabnam Behdin; Suncica Travan; Erika Benavides; Yvonne Kapila
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-01-18
View more
  1 in total

1.  Characterization of Dental Pulp Stem Cells Response to Bone Substitutes Biomaterials in Dentistry.

Authors:  Rosanna Di Tinco; Ugo Consolo; Alessandra Pisciotta; Giulia Orlandi; Giulia Bertani; Milena Nasi; Jessika Bertacchini; Gianluca Carnevale
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.967

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.