| Literature DB >> 29707183 |
Spyros Damaskos1,2, Konstantinos Syriopoulos3,4, Rogier L Sens3,4, Constantinus Politis3,4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was: a) to examine the visibility and morphology of the petrotympanic fissure on cone-beam computed tomography images, and b) to investigate whether the petrotympanic fissure morphology is significantly affected by gender and age, or not.Entities:
Keywords: arthroscopy; cone-beam computed tomography; temporal bone; temporomandibular joint
Year: 2018 PMID: 29707183 PMCID: PMC5913417 DOI: 10.5037/jomr.2018.9104
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Oral Maxillofac Res ISSN: 2029-283X
Figure 1Enrolment process for the subjects [30].
Figure 2A = cross-sectional image setup according to the modification of the Pöschl projection.
B = axial slice showing the petrotympanic fissure (1, arrow), mandibular fossa (2) and the tympanic cavity (3).
C = cross-sectional display of the petrotympanic fissure (4, arrow).
Figure 3Cone-beam computed tomography image of the right TMJ area (sagittal plane), showing (circle) the petrotympanic fissure morphology type 1 (wide tunnel-shape).
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the sample
| N (%) | |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Female | 50 (47.2) |
| Male | 56 (52.8) |
|
| 106 (100) |
|
| |
| Type 1 (widely open) | 47 (44.3) |
| Type 2 (narrow middle) | 28 (26.4) |
| Type 3 (very narrow/closed) | 31 (29.2) |
|
| |
| Type 1 (widely open) | 38 (35.8) |
| Type 2 (narrow middle) | 44 (41.5) |
| Type 3 (very narrow/closed) | 24 (22.6) |
|
| 212 (200) |
|
|
|
| 47.4 (15.9) | |
PTF = petrotympanic fissure; N = number; SD = standard deviation.
Distribution of the PTF morphology-right, within the PTF morphology-left categories
|
PTF morphology-left | Overall | P-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Widely open | Narrow middle | Very narrow/closed | |||
| N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | ||
|
| |||||
| Type 1 (widely open) | 26 (68.4) | 15 (34.1) | 6 (25) | 47 (44.3) | 0.001 |
| Type 2 (narrow middle) | 9 (23.7) | 11 (25) | 8 (33.3) | 28 (26.4) | |
| Type 3 (very narrow/closed) | 3 (7.9) | 18 (40.9) | 10 (41.7) | 31 (29.2) | |
|
| 38 (100) | 44 (100) | 24 (100) | 106 (100) | |
PTF = petrotympanic fissure; N = number.
Distribution of the PTF's morphology (left and right) by gender
|
Femalea |
Malea |
Overalla | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Type 1 (widely open) | 25 (50) | 22 (39.3) | 47 (44.3) | 0.264b |
| Type 2 (narrow middle) | 13 (26) | 15 (26.8) | 28 (26.4) | |
| Type 3 (very narrow/closed) | 12 (24) | 19 (33.9) | 31 (29.2) | |
|
| ||||
| Type 1 (widely open) | 20 (40) | 18 (32.1) | 38 (35.8) | 0.211b |
| Type 2 (narrow middle) | 21 (42) | 23 (41.1) | 44 (41.5) | |
| Type 3 (very narrow/closed) | 9 (18) | 15 (26.8) | 24 (22.6) | |
aAll figures are N (%) for PTF morphology.
bNot significant, ordinal logistic regression analysis test (significance level P < 0.05).
PTF = petrotympanic fissure; n = number.
Distribution of the PTF's morphology (left and right) by age group
|
Age (years) | Overall | P-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 - 29 | 30 - 49 | 50+ | |||
| N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | ||
|
| |||||
| Type 1 (widely open) | 4 (21.1) | 19 (55.9) | 24 (45.3) | 47 (44.3) | 0.04a |
| Type 2 (narrow middle) | 8 (42.1) | 10 (29.4) | 10 (18.9) | 28 (26.4) | |
| Type 3 (very narrow/closed) | 7 (36.8) | 5 (14.7) | 19 (35.8) | 31 (29.2) | |
|
| |||||
| Type 1 (widely open) | 5 (26.3) | 15 (44.1) | 18 (34) | 38 (35.8) | 0.596b |
| Type 2 (narrow middle) | 9 (47.4) | 14 (41.2) | 21 (39.6) | 44 (41.5) | |
| Type 3 (very narrow/closed) | 5 (26.3) | 5 (14.7) | 14 (26.4) | 24 (22.6) | |
|
| 19 (100) | 34 (100) | 53 (100) | 106 (100) | |
aSignificant, Chi-square test (significance level P < 0.05).
bNot significant, Chi-square test (significance level P < 0.05).
PTF = petrotympanic fissure; N = number.