Literature DB >> 29706793

An algorithm to correct saturated mass spectrometry ion abundances for enhanced quantitation and mass accuracy in omic studies.

Aivett Bilbao1, Bryson C Gibbons1, Gordon W Slysz1, Kevin L Crowell1, Matthew E Monroe1, Yehia M Ibrahim1, Richard D Smith1, Samuel H Payne1, Erin S Baker1.   

Abstract

The mass accuracy and peak intensity of ions detected by mass spectrometry (MS) measurements are essential to facilitate compound identification and quantitation. However, high concentration species can yield erroneous results if their ion intensities reach beyond the limits of the detection system, leading to distorted and non-ideal detector response (e.g. saturation), and largely precluding the calculation of accurate m/z and intensity values. Here we present an open source computational method to correct peaks above a defined intensity (saturated) threshold determined by the MS instrumentation such as the analog-to-digital converters or time-to-digital converters used in conjunction with time-of-flight MS. In this method, the isotopic envelope for each observed ion above the saturation threshold is compared to its expected theoretical isotopic distribution. The most intense isotopic peak for which saturation does not occur is then utilized to re-calculate the precursor m/z and correct the intensity, resulting in both higher mass accuracy and greater dynamic range. The benefits of this approach were evaluated with proteomic and lipidomic datasets of varying complexities. After correcting the high concentration species, reduced mass errors and enhanced dynamic range were observed for both simple and complex omic samples. Specifically, the mass error dropped by more than 50% in most cases for highly saturated species and dynamic range increased by 1-2 orders of magnitude for peptides in a blood serum sample.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analog-to-digital converter saturation; Detector saturation; Isotopic envelope; Isotopic ratios; Mass spectrometry; Quantitation; Saturation correction

Year:  2017        PMID: 29706793      PMCID: PMC5920534          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2017.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1387-3806            Impact factor:   1.986


  27 in total

1.  Estimating the precision of exact mass measurements on an orthogonal time-of-flight mass spectrometer.

Authors:  K F Blom
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Isotopic compositions and accurate masses of single isotopic peaks.

Authors:  Alan L Rockwood; Jordan R Van Orman; David V Dearden
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Exact mass measurement on an electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer: error distribution and selective averaging.

Authors:  Jiejun Wu; Heather McAllister
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.982

4.  A fully automated method for accurate mass determination using high-performance liquid chromatography with a quadrupole/orthogonal acceleration time-of-flight mass spectrometer.

Authors:  Maristella Colombo; Federico Riccardi Sirtori; Vincenzo Rizzo
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Dynamic range of mass accuracy in LTQ Orbitrap hybrid mass spectrometer.

Authors:  Alexander Makarov; Eduard Denisov; Oliver Lange; Stevan Horning
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 3.109

6.  Ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry performance using electrodynamic ion funnels and elevated drift gas pressures.

Authors:  Erin Shammel Baker; Brian H Clowers; Fumin Li; Keqi Tang; Aleksey V Tolmachev; David C Prior; Mikhail E Belov; Richard D Smith
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  LC-IMS-MS Feature Finder: detecting multidimensional liquid chromatography, ion mobility and mass spectrometry features in complex datasets.

Authors:  Kevin L Crowell; Gordon W Slysz; Erin S Baker; Brian L LaMarche; Matthew E Monroe; Yehia M Ibrahim; Samuel H Payne; Gordon A Anderson; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Determination of monoisotopic masses and ion populations for large biomolecules from resolved isotopic distributions.

Authors:  M W Senko; S C Beu; F W McLaffertycor
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.109

9.  OpenSWATH enables automated, targeted analysis of data-independent acquisition MS data.

Authors:  Hannes L Röst; George Rosenberger; Pedro Navarro; Ludovic Gillet; Saša M Miladinović; Olga T Schubert; Witold Wolski; Ben C Collins; Johan Malmström; Lars Malmström; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Decon2LS: An open-source software package for automated processing and visualization of high resolution mass spectrometry data.

Authors:  Navdeep Jaitly; Anoop Mayampurath; Kyle Littlefield; Joshua N Adkins; Gordon A Anderson; Richard D Smith
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  8 in total

1.  Improved Sensitivity and Separations for Phosphopeptides using Online Liquid Chromotography Coupled with Structures for Lossless Ion Manipulations Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Christopher D Chouinard; Gabe Nagy; Ian K Webb; Tujin Shi; Erin S Baker; Spencer A Prost; Tao Liu; Yehia M Ibrahim; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Improving Signal to Noise Ratios in Ion Mobility Spectrometry and Structures for Lossless Ion Manipulations (SLIM) using a High Dynamic Range Analog-to-Digital Converter.

Authors:  Adam L Hollerbach; Cameron M Giberson; Joon-Yong Lee; Adam P Huntley; Richard D Smith; Yehia M Ibrahim
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Simplifying MS1 and MS2 spectra to achieve lower mass error, more dynamic range, and higher peptide identification confidence on the Bruker timsTOF Pro.

Authors:  Daryl Wilding-McBride; Laura F Dagley; Sukhdeep K Spall; Giuseppe Infusini; Andrew I Webb
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  A Preprocessing Tool for Enhanced Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry-Based Omics Workflows.

Authors:  Aivett Bilbao; Bryson C Gibbons; Sarah M Stow; Jennifer E Kyle; Kent J Bloodsworth; Samuel H Payne; Richard D Smith; Yehia M Ibrahim; Erin S Baker; John C Fjeldsted
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 5.  Inferring Protein-Protein Interaction Networks From Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Approaches: A Mini-Review.

Authors:  Kumar Yugandhar; Shagun Gupta; Haiyuan Yu
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 7.271

6.  UHPLC-IM-Q-ToFMS analysis of maradolipids, found exclusively in Caenorhabditis elegans dauer larvae.

Authors:  Michael Witting; Ulrike Schmidt; Hans-Joachim Knölker
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.142

7.  Evaluation of acquisition modes for semi-quantitative analysis by targeted and untargeted mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Hannah M Britt; Tristan Cragnolini; Suniya Khatun; Abubakar Hatimy; Juliette James; Nathanael Page; Jonathan P Williams; Christopher Hughes; Richard Denny; Konstantinos Thalassinos; Johannes P C Vissers
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 8.  How to identify "Material basis-Quality markers" more accurately in Chinese herbal medicines from modern chromatography-mass spectrometry data-sets: Opportunities and challenges of chemometric tools.

Authors:  Min He; Yu Zhou
Journal:  Chin Herb Med       Date:  2020-08-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.