Literature DB >> 29706665

Electrostatic Control of Polymer Translocation Speed through α‑Hemolysin Protein Pore.

Byoung-Jin Jeon1, Murugappan Muthukumar1.   

Abstract

The electrostatic origins behind the speed of translocation of a uniformly charged flexible macromolecule through α-hemolysin (αHL) protein pores under a voltage are investigated using variations in pH and electrolyte concentration. We have measured durations of successful threading of poly(styrenesulfonate) through αHL at two different pH conditions, pH 4.5 and pH 7.5, under various salt concentration conditions. Salt concentrations in the donor (cis) and the recipient (trans) compartments influence the polymer translocation dynamics differently, depending on pH. At both pH 4.5 and pH 7.5, decreasing the cis salt concentration, cs,cis , results in faster polymer translocations. On the other hand, a decrease in trans salt concentration, cs,trans , retards the polymer transport process at pH 4.5, while at pH 7.5 the translocation time is observed to be independent of cs,trans . We present a theoretical model to calculate the translocation times from the free energy of the polymer along the translocation process to describe our experimental results. We show that the charge density of the polymer inside the nanopore is significantly affected by cs,cis , explaining the cis salt effect on the speed of polymer translocation. The trans salt effects are attributed to the electrostatic interaction between the polymer and the exit portion of the αHL pore, which is determined by the pH of the trans compartment. At low pH where the net charge of the end of the αHL is positive, the attractive electrostatic interaction in trans becomes stronger, as cs,trans decreases, resulting in delays in translocation process.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 29706665      PMCID: PMC5919254          DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b01663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Macromolecules        ISSN: 0024-9297            Impact factor:   5.985


  29 in total

1.  Rapid nanopore discrimination between single polynucleotide molecules.

Authors:  A Meller; L Nivon; E Brandin; J Golovchenko; D Branton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Fabrication of solid-state nanopores with single-nanometre precision.

Authors:  A J Storm; J H Chen; X S Ling; H W Zandbergen; C Dekker
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 43.841

3.  Unfolding of proteins and long transient conformations detected by single nanopore recording.

Authors:  G Oukhaled; J Mathé; A-L Biance; L Bacri; J-M Betton; D Lairez; J Pelta; L Auvray
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2007-04-09       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Sequence-specific detection of individual DNA polymerase complexes in real time using a nanopore.

Authors:  Seico Benner; Roger J A Chen; Noah A Wilson; Robin Abu-Shumays; Nicholas Hurt; Kate R Lieberman; David W Deamer; William B Dunbar; Mark Akeson
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2007-10-28       Impact factor: 39.213

5.  Dynamics of completely unfolded and native proteins through solid-state nanopores as a function of electric driving force.

Authors:  Abdelghani Oukhaled; Benjamin Cressiot; Laurent Bacri; Manuela Pastoriza-Gallego; Jean-Michel Betton; Eric Bourhis; Ralf Jede; Jacques Gierak; Loïc Auvray; Juan Pelta
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 15.881

6.  Characterization of individual polynucleotide molecules using a membrane channel.

Authors:  J J Kasianowicz; E Brandin; D Branton; D W Deamer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Electrophoretic mobilities of counterions and a polymer in cylindrical pores.

Authors:  Sunil P Singh; M Muthukumar
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2014-09-21       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 8.  Nanopores: A journey towards DNA sequencing.

Authors:  Meni Wanunu
Journal:  Phys Life Rev       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Electrostatic focusing of unlabelled DNA into nanoscale pores using a salt gradient.

Authors:  Meni Wanunu; Will Morrison; Yitzhak Rabin; Alexander Y Grosberg; Amit Meller
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2009-12-20       Impact factor: 39.213

Review 10.  The potential and challenges of nanopore sequencing.

Authors:  Daniel Branton; David W Deamer; Andre Marziali; Hagan Bayley; Steven A Benner; Thomas Butler; Massimiliano Di Ventra; Slaven Garaj; Andrew Hibbs; Xiaohua Huang; Stevan B Jovanovich; Predrag S Krstic; Stuart Lindsay; Xinsheng Sean Ling; Carlos H Mastrangelo; Amit Meller; John S Oliver; Yuriy V Pershin; J Michael Ramsey; Robert Riehn; Gautam V Soni; Vincent Tabard-Cossa; Meni Wanunu; Matthew Wiggin; Jeffery A Schloss
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Membrane protein-based biosensors.

Authors:  Nobuo Misawa; Toshihisa Osaki; Shoji Takeuchi
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  Localized Nanopore Fabrication via Controlled Breakdown.

Authors:  Cuifeng Ying; Tianji Ma; Lei Xu; Mohsen Rahmani
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 5.719

3.  Translocation, Rejection and Trapping of Polyampholytes.

Authors:  Yeong-Beom Kim; Min-Kyung Chae; Jeong-Man Park; Albert Johner; Nam-Kyung Lee
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 4.329

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.