Literature DB >> 29688158

Prospective Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of MR Imaging versus CT for Acute Appendicitis.

Michael D Repplinger1, Perry J Pickhardt1, Jessica B Robbins1, Douglas R Kitchin1, Tim J Ziemlewicz1, Scott J Hetzel1, Sean K Golden1, John B Harringa1, Scott B Reeder1.   

Abstract

Purpose To compare the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with that of computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in emergency department (ED) patients. Materials and Methods This was an institutional review board-approved, prospective, observational study of ED patients at an academic medical center (February 2012 to August 2014). Eligible patients were nonpregnant and 12- year-old or older patients in whom a CT study had been ordered for evaluation for appendicitis. After informed consent was obtained, CT and MR imaging (with non-contrast material-enhanced, diffusion-weighted, and intravenous contrast-enhanced sequences) were performed in tandem, and the images were subsequently retrospectively interpreted in random order by three abdominal radiologists who were blinded to the patients' clinical outcomes. Likelihood of appendicitis was rated on a five-point scale for both CT and MR imaging. A composite reference standard of surgical and histopathologic results and clinical follow-up was used, arbitrated by an expert panel of three investigators. Test characteristics were calculated and reported as point estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Analysis included images of 198 patients (114 women [58%]; mean age, 31.6 years ± 14.2 [range, 12-81 years]; prevalence of appendicitis, 32.3%). The sensitivity and specificity were 96.9% (95% CI: 88.2%, 99.5%) and 81.3% (95% CI: 73.5%, 87.3%) for MR imaging and 98.4% (95% CI: 90.5%, 99.9%) and 89.6% (95% CI: 82.8%, 94.0%) for CT, respectively, when a cutoff point of 3 or higher was used. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 5.2 (95% CI: 3.7, 7.7) and 0.04 (95% CI: 0, 0.11) for MR imaging and 9.4 (95% CI: 5.9, 16.4) and 0.02 (95% CI: 0.00, 0.06) for CT, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the optimal cutoff point to maximize accuracy was 4 or higher, at which point there was no difference between MR imaging and CT. Conclusion The diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging was similar to that of CT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. © RSNA, 2018.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29688158      PMCID: PMC6067821          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018171838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  31 in total

Review 1.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Spiral CT: how much does radiation dose matter?

Authors:  A K Dixon; P Dendy
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-10-03       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Statistical methodology: I. Incorporating the prevalence of disease into the sample size calculation for sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  N M Buderer
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  MR imaging of the normal appendix and acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Norihisa Nitta; Masashi Takahashi; Akira Furukawa; Kiyoshi Murata; Masayuki Mori; Masanobu Fukushima
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  Appendicitis at the millennium.

Authors:  B A Birnbaum; S R Wilson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomography for suspected acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Edward M Lawrence; B Dustin Pooler; Richard J Bruce
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI Versus CT for the Evaluation of Acute Appendicitis in Children and Young Adults.

Authors:  Sonja Kinner; Perry J Pickhardt; Erica L Riedesel; Kara G Gill; Jessica B Robbins; Douglas R Kitchin; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; John B Harringa; Scott B Reeder; Michael D Repplinger
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Contrast-Enhanced Abdominal MRI for Suspected Appendicitis: How We Do It.

Authors:  Sonja Kinner; Michael D Repplinger; Perry J Pickhardt; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Ultrasonography/MRI versus CT for diagnosing appendicitis.

Authors:  Gudrun Aspelund; Abbey Fingeret; Erica Gross; David Kessler; Connie Keung; Arul Thirumoorthi; Pilyung Stephen Oh; Gerald Behr; Susie Chen; Brooke Lampl; William Middlesworth; Jessica Kandel; Carrie Ruzal-Shapiro
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  The value of diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient quantification in the diagnosis of perforated and nonperforated appendicitis.

Authors:  Serhat Avcu; Feray Altun Çetin; Halil Arslan; Özgur Kemik; Ahmet Cumhur Dülger
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.630

View more
  12 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of MRI compared with CT for the etiology of abdominal pain in emergency department patients with concern for appendicitis.

Authors:  John B Harringa; Rebecca L Bracken; John C Davis; Lu Mao; Douglas R Kitchin; Jessica B Robbins; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Perry J Pickhardt; Scott B Reeder; Michael D Repplinger
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Noncontrast MRI of acute abdominal pain caused by gastrointestinal lesions: indications, protocol, and image interpretation.

Authors:  Akitoshi Inoue; Akira Furukawa; Kai Takaki; Yugo Imai; Shinichi Ota; Norihisa Nitta; Yoshiyuki Watanabe
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Diagnostic performance of standardized ultrasound protocol for detecting perforation in pediatric appendicitis.

Authors:  Erica L Riedesel; Blake C Weber; Matthew W Shore; Randi S Cartmill; Daniel J Ostlie; Charles M Leys; Kara G Gill; Jonathan E Kohler
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-07-24

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography and ultrasound for the diagnosis of female pelvic pathology.

Authors:  John B Harringa; Rebecca L Bracken; B Keegan Markhardt; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Meghan Lubner; Arthur Chiu; Jen Birstler; Perry J Pickhardt; Scott B Reeder; Michael D Repplinger
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2021-03-17

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Nigel D'Souza; Georgina Hicks; Richard Beable; Antony Higginson; Bo Rud
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-12-14

6.  Optimization of pulse sequences in ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of acute abdominal pain caused by gastrointestinal disease.

Authors:  Akitoshi Inoue; Akira Furukawa; Norihisa Nitta; Kai Takaki; Shinichi Ohta; Kiyoshi Murata
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2020-08-19

7.  Computed tomography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adults.

Authors:  Bo Rud; Thomas S Vejborg; Eli D Rappeport; Johannes B Reitsma; Peer Wille-Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-19

8.  MR Imaging-based Evaluation of Mesenteric Ischemia Caused by Strangulated Small Bowel Obstruction and Mesenteric Venous Occlusion: An Experimental Study Using Rabbits.

Authors:  Akitoshi Inoue; Norihisa Nitta; Shinichi Ota; Kai Takaki; Yugo Imai; Sayaka Misaki; Takayasu Iwai; Akinaga Sonoda; Ken-Ichi Mukaisho; Kiyoshi Murata
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.471

9.  Reliability of standardized reporting system of acute appendicitis in adults at low-dose 320-rows CT.

Authors:  Shravan Kumar Mahankali; Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek; Shefeek Abubacker Ahamed
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2019-11-14

10.  Abdominal fellowship-trained versus generalist radiologist accuracy when interpreting MR and CT for the diagnosis of appendicitis.

Authors:  Rebecca L Bracken; John B Harringa; B Keegan Markhardt; Newrhee Kim; John K Park; Douglas R Kitchin; Jessica B Robbins; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Jen Birstler; Michael J Ryan; Ly Hoang; Perry J Pickhardt; Scott B Reeder; Michael D Repplinger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.