Sonja Kinner1,2, Perry J Pickhardt1, Erica L Riedesel1, Kara G Gill1, Jessica B Robbins1, Douglas R Kitchin1, Timothy J Ziemlewicz1, John B Harringa3, Scott B Reeder1,3,4,5,6, Michael D Repplinger1,3. 1. 1 Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53705. 2. 2 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. 3. 3 BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI. 4. 4 Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI. 5. 5 Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI. 6. 6 Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Appendicitis is frequently diagnosed in the emergency department, most commonly using CT. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced MRI with that of contrast-enhanced CT for the diagnosis of appendicitis in adolescents when interpreted by abdominal radiologists and pediatric radiologists. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Our study included a prospectively enrolled cohort of 48 patients (12-20 years old) with nontraumatic abdominal pain who underwent CT and MRI. Fellowship-trained abdominal and pediatric radiologists reviewed all CT and MRI studies in randomized order, blinded to patient outcome. Likelihood for appendicitis was rated on a 5-point scale (1, definitely not appendicitis; 5, definitely appendicitis) for CT, the unenhanced portion of the MRI, and the entire contrast-enhanced MRI study. ROC curves were generated and AUC compared for each scan type for all six readers and then stratified by radiologist type. Image test characteristics, interrater reliability, and reading times were compared. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity were 85.9% (95% CI, 76.2-92.7%) and 93.8% (95% CI, 89.7-96.7%) for unenhanced MRI, 93.6% (95% CI, 85.6-97.9%) and 94.3% (95% CI, 90.2-97%) for contrast-enhanced MRI, and 93.6% (95% CI, 85.6-97.9%) and 94.3% (95% CI, 90.2-97%) for CT. No difference was found in the diagnostic accuracy or interpretation time when comparing abdominal radiologists to pediatric radiologists (CT, 3.0 min vs 2.8 min; contrast-enhanced MRI, 2.4 min vs 1.8 min; unenhanced MRI, 1.5 min vs 2.3 min). Substantial agreement between abdominal and pediatric radiologists was seen for all methods (κ = 0.72-0.83). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic accuracy of MRI to diagnose appendicitis was very similar to CT. No statistically significant difference in accuracy was observed between imaging modality or radiologist subspecialty.
OBJECTIVE:Appendicitis is frequently diagnosed in the emergency department, most commonly using CT. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced MRI with that of contrast-enhanced CT for the diagnosis of appendicitis in adolescents when interpreted by abdominal radiologists and pediatric radiologists. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Our study included a prospectively enrolled cohort of 48 patients (12-20 years old) with nontraumatic abdominal pain who underwent CT and MRI. Fellowship-trained abdominal and pediatric radiologists reviewed all CT and MRI studies in randomized order, blinded to patient outcome. Likelihood for appendicitis was rated on a 5-point scale (1, definitely not appendicitis; 5, definitely appendicitis) for CT, the unenhanced portion of the MRI, and the entire contrast-enhanced MRI study. ROC curves were generated and AUC compared for each scan type for all six readers and then stratified by radiologist type. Image test characteristics, interrater reliability, and reading times were compared. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity were 85.9% (95% CI, 76.2-92.7%) and 93.8% (95% CI, 89.7-96.7%) for unenhanced MRI, 93.6% (95% CI, 85.6-97.9%) and 94.3% (95% CI, 90.2-97%) for contrast-enhanced MRI, and 93.6% (95% CI, 85.6-97.9%) and 94.3% (95% CI, 90.2-97%) for CT. No difference was found in the diagnostic accuracy or interpretation time when comparing abdominal radiologists to pediatric radiologists (CT, 3.0 min vs 2.8 min; contrast-enhanced MRI, 2.4 min vs 1.8 min; unenhanced MRI, 1.5 min vs 2.3 min). Substantial agreement between abdominal and pediatric radiologists was seen for all methods (κ = 0.72-0.83). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic accuracy of MRI to diagnose appendicitis was very similar to CT. No statistically significant difference in accuracy was observed between imaging modality or radiologist subspecialty.
Authors: Julie Ruma; Katherine A Klein; Suzanne Chong; Jeffrey Wesolowski; Ella A Kazerooni; James H Ellis; James D Myles Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Lucila A Rosines; Daniel S Chow; Brooke S Lampl; Susie Chen; Samantha Gordon; Leonora W Mui; Gudrun Aspelund; Carrie B Ruzal-Shapiro Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Lauren M B Burke; Mustafa R Bashir; Frank H Miller; Evan S Siegelman; Michele Brown; Mamdoh Alobaidy; Tracy A Jaffe; Shahid M Hussain; Suzanne L Palmer; Bonnie L Garon; Aytekin Oto; Caroline Reinhold; Susan M Ascher; Danielle K Demulder; Stephen Thomas; Shaun Best; James Borer; Ken Zhao; Fanny Pinel-Giroux; Isabela De Oliveira; Daniel Resende; Richard C Semelka Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2015-07-26 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Charity C Glass; Jacqueline M Saito; Feroze Sidhwa; Danielle B Cameron; Christina Feng; Mahima Karki; Fizan Abdullah; Marjorie J Arca; Adam B Goldin; Douglas C Barnhart; David Zurakowski; Shawn J Rangel Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2016-03-02 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: John B Harringa; Rebecca L Bracken; John C Davis; Lu Mao; Douglas R Kitchin; Jessica B Robbins; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Perry J Pickhardt; Scott B Reeder; Michael D Repplinger Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-03-20 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Michael D Repplinger; Perry J Pickhardt; Jessica B Robbins; Douglas R Kitchin; Tim J Ziemlewicz; Scott J Hetzel; Sean K Golden; John B Harringa; Scott B Reeder Journal: Radiology Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Salomone Di Saverio; Mauro Podda; Belinda De Simone; Marco Ceresoli; Goran Augustin; Alice Gori; Marja Boermeester; Massimo Sartelli; Federico Coccolini; Antonio Tarasconi; Nicola De' Angelis; Dieter G Weber; Matti Tolonen; Arianna Birindelli; Walter Biffl; Ernest E Moore; Michael Kelly; Kjetil Soreide; Jeffry Kashuk; Richard Ten Broek; Carlos Augusto Gomes; Michael Sugrue; Richard Justin Davies; Dimitrios Damaskos; Ari Leppäniemi; Andrew Kirkpatrick; Andrew B Peitzman; Gustavo P Fraga; Ronald V Maier; Raul Coimbra; Massimo Chiarugi; Gabriele Sganga; Adolfo Pisanu; Gian Luigi De' Angelis; Edward Tan; Harry Van Goor; Francesco Pata; Isidoro Di Carlo; Osvaldo Chiara; Andrey Litvin; Fabio C Campanile; Boris Sakakushev; Gia Tomadze; Zaza Demetrashvili; Rifat Latifi; Fakri Abu-Zidan; Oreste Romeo; Helmut Segovia-Lohse; Gianluca Baiocchi; David Costa; Sandro Rizoli; Zsolt J Balogh; Cino Bendinelli; Thomas Scalea; Rao Ivatury; George Velmahos; Roland Andersson; Yoram Kluger; Luca Ansaloni; Fausto Catena Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 5.469
Authors: Rebecca L Bracken; John B Harringa; B Keegan Markhardt; Newrhee Kim; John K Park; Douglas R Kitchin; Jessica B Robbins; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Jen Birstler; Michael J Ryan; Ly Hoang; Perry J Pickhardt; Scott B Reeder; Michael D Repplinger Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 5.315