Literature DB >> 8870764

Statistical methodology: I. Incorporating the prevalence of disease into the sample size calculation for sensitivity and specificity.

N M Buderer1.   

Abstract

Careful consideration of statistical issues related to the choice of a sample size is critical for achieving meaningful results in research studies designed to evaluate diagnostic tests. When assessing the ability of a diagnostic test to screen for disease, the parameters sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values are of interest. Study sample size requirements can be calculated based on a clinically acceptable degree of precision, the hypothesized values of sensitivity and specificity, and the estimated prevalence of disease in the target population. The simple methods and tables in this paper guide the researcher when deciding how many subjects to sample in a study designed to estimate both the sensitivity and the specificity of a diagnostic test, given a specified precision and estimated disease prevalence.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8870764     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03538.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  140 in total

Review 1.  An introduction to power and sample size estimation.

Authors:  S R Jones; S Carley; M Harrison
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Simple nomograms to calculate sample size in diagnostic studies.

Authors:  S Carley; S Dosman; S R Jones; M Harrison
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  A comparative assessment of two conservative methods for the diagnosis of catheter-related infection in critically ill patients.

Authors:  John R Gowardman; Paula Jeffries; Melissa Lassig-Smith; Janine Stuart; Paul Jarrett; Renae Deans; Matthew McGrail; Narelle M George; Graeme R Nimmo; Claire M Rickard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Electronic screening of medical records to detect inpatients at risk of drug-related problems.

Authors:  Isabelle Roten; Stefan Marty; Johnny Beney
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2009-12-10

5.  Breast cancer screening in a resource poor country: Ultrasound versus mammography.

Authors:  Olubukola At Omidiji; Princess C Campbell; Nicholas K Irurhe; Omolola M Atalabi; Oluyemisi O Toyobo
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2017-03

Review 6.  Requirements for Minimum Sample Size for Sensitivity and Specificity Analysis.

Authors:  Mohamad Adam Bujang; Tassha Hilda Adnan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-10-01

7.  Assessment of heart rate, acidosis, consciousness, oxygenation, and respiratory rate to predict noninvasive ventilation failure in hypoxemic patients.

Authors:  Jun Duan; Xiaoli Han; Linfu Bai; Lintong Zhou; Shicong Huang
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Birth Certificate Validity and the Impact on Primary Cesarean Section Quality Measure in New York State.

Authors:  Raina E Josberger; Meng Wu; Elizabeth L Nichols
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2019-04

9.  Field evaluation of a broadly sensitive HIV-1 in-house genotyping assay for use with both plasma and dried blood spot specimens in a resource-limited country.

Authors:  Seth Inzaule; Chunfu Yang; Alex Kasembeli; Lillian Nafisa; Jully Okonji; Boaz Oyaro; Richard Lando; Lisa A Mills; Kayla Laserson; Timothy Thomas; John Nkengasong; Clement Zeh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Additional value of PCA3 density to predict initial prostate biopsy outcome.

Authors:  A Ruffion; P Perrin; M Devonec; D Champetier; M Decaussin; P Paparel; V Vlaeminck-Guillem
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.