| Literature DB >> 29686894 |
Cristiane Copetti1, Fernanda Wouters Franco1, Eduarda da Rosa Machado1, Marcela Bromberger Soquetta2, Andréia Quatrin1, Vitor de Miranda Ramos3, José Cláudio Fonseca Moreira3, Tatiana Emanuelli1, Cláudia Kaehler Sautter1, Neidi Garcia Penna1.
Abstract
Few studies investigated the biological effects of American grape cultivars. We investigated the metabolic response after acute consumption of grape juice or wine from Bordo grapes (Vitis labrusca) in a placebo-controlled crossover study with fifteen healthy volunteers. Blood samples were collected 1 hour after the intake of 100 mL of water, juice, or wine to measure TBARS, ABTS, FRAP, glucose, and uric acid levels. To evaluate differences in cellular response, intracellular reactive species production (DCFH-DA) and metabolic mitochondrial viability (MTT) were assessed after exposure of human neuron-like cells (SH-SY5Y) to juice or wine. Glycemia was reduced after juice or wine consumption, whereas blood levels of uric acid were reduced after juice consumption but increased after wine consumption. Juice and wine consumption reduced plasma lipid peroxidation and increased plasma antioxidant capacity (ABTS and FRAP assays). Furthermore, juice inhibited H2O2-induced intracellular production of reactive species (RS) and increased the viability of SH-SY5Y cells. In contrast, wine (dealcoholized) exhibited a per se effect by inducing the production of RS and reducing cell viability. These results indicate a positive impact of acute consumption of Bordo juice and wine on human oxidative status, whereas only juice had protective effects against oxidative stress-induced cytotoxicity.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29686894 PMCID: PMC5852837 DOI: 10.1155/2018/4384012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nutr Metab ISSN: 2090-0724
Selection criteria of study participants.
| Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
|---|---|
| Apparently healthy individuals | Pregnant and lactating women |
| Age 18–35 years old | Alcoholic and smokers |
| BMI between 18.5 and 29.9 kg/m2 | Vegetarian diet |
| SBP < 140 mmHg and DBP ≤ 90 mmHg | Regular use of antioxidants or vitamin supplements |
| Chronic diseases (cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, diabetes, liver diseases, cancer, or allergy); gastrointestinal disorders or known metabolic diseases; infections or inflammatory processes visible or known in the three months prior to the study |
BMI = body mass index, SBP = systolic blood pressure, and DBP = diastolic blood pressure.
Figure 1Flowchart of the selection of subjects in the controlled intervention study.
Baseline characteristics of subjects enrolled in the study.
| Participants ( | ||
|---|---|---|
| Male ( | Female ( | |
| Age (years) | 23.8 ± 4.0 | 24.3 ± 4.0 |
| (19–30) | (22–33) | |
| Weight (kg) | 79.0 ± 14.7 | 61.0 ± 5.8 |
| (65–95) | (54–70) | |
| Height (cm) | 180.6 ± 0.1 | 160.0 ± 0.1 |
| (169–191) | (154–172) | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.3 ± 4.5 | 23.4 ± 2.5 |
| (20.1–30.3) | (20.2–28.7) | |
| SBP (mmHg) | 117.2 ± 13.6 | 115.8 ± 9.8 |
| (110–132) | (100–130) | |
| DBP (mmHg) | 81.6 ± 8.2 | 76.9 ± 4.7 |
| (70–90) | (70–80) | |
| Practice of physical activity at least once a week (%) | 2 (40%) | 3 (30%) |
| Physical inactivity (%) | 3 (60%) | 7 (70%) |
Data are expressed as means ± SEM (minimum–maximum), except for the physical activity/inactivity that was expressed as the number of participants (%). BMI = body mass index, SBP = systolic blood pressure, and DBP = diastolic blood pressure.
Phenolic composition and in vitro antioxidant activity of the Bordo grape juice and wine.
| Parameter | Bordo juice | Bordo wine |
|---|---|---|
| Total polyphenol index ( | 184.2 ± 13.1b | 371.3 ± 9.6a |
| Total anthocyanins ( | 17.5 ± 22.5b | 66.74 ± 10.2a |
| Total flavonols ( | 84.5 ± 9.7b | 93.6 ± 4.6a |
| Total antioxidant activity | ||
| ABTS ( | 316.5 ± 14.6b | 448.7 ± 12.1a |
| FRAP ( | 234.6 ± 9.5a | 234.9 ± 7.1a |
Values are means ± SEM of determinations in triplicate. a,bDifferent superscript letters denote significant differences (Tukey's test, p < 0.05). GAE = gallic acid equivalent; TEAC = Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity.
Figure 2Changes in serum TBARS levels (a) and plasma antioxidant capacity assessed by the ABTS (b) and FRAP (c) assays in humans after consumption of Bordo juice, Bordo wine, or water (control). Results are expressed as percentage of baseline values for each group (means ± SEM, n = 15). ∗Significantly different from baseline (paired Student's t-test; ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001). a,bDifferent letters indicate significant difference among interventions (Tukey's test, p < 0.05).
Glucose and uric acid levels in healthy individuals at baseline and after the interventions with Bordo grape juice, Bordo wine, and water (control).
| Intervention samples | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Biochemical parameters | Control | Bordo grapes | |
| Bordo juice | Bordo wine | ||
| Serum glucose (mg/dL) | |||
| Baseline | 84.1 ± 5.8 | 74.4 ± 5.5 | 82.2 ± 7.1 |
| 1 h after intervention | 82.3 ± 5.5 | 69.3 ± 6.2 | 74.8 ± 7.4 |
| Change versus baseline (%) | −2.0 ± 1.5b | −6.7 ± 1.7ab∗∗ | −8.8 ± 2.0a∗∗ |
| Uric acid (mg/dL) | |||
| Baseline | 4.8 ± 1.9 | 4.8 ± 1.6 | 4.4 ± 1.2 |
| 1 h after intervention | 4.6 ± 1.8 | 4.6 ± 1.5 | 4.6 ± 1.2 |
| Change versus baseline (%) | −4.6 ± 1.4b∗∗ | −4.1 ± 1.1b∗∗ | 4.2 ± 1.2a∗ |
Results are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 15). ∗Significantly different from baseline (paired Student's t-test; ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01). a,bDifferent letters indicate significant difference among interventions (Tukey's test, p < 0.05).
Figure 3Effect of Bordo grape juice and wine on H2O2-induced cytotoxicity in SH-SY5Y cells. (a) DCF fluorescence of cells treated with Bordo grape juice. (b) DCF fluorescence of cells treated with Bordo grape wine. (c) Cell viability of cells treated with Bordo grape juice. (d) Cell viability of cells treated with Bordo grape wine. Cells were exposed to 0 (vehicle), 250, 500, and 1000 µg/mL of Bordo juice or Bordo wine during 5 h (panels (a) and (b)) or 24 h (panels (c) and (d)). Two-way ANOVA was applied to all data. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001 versus the respective vehicle group.