| Literature DB >> 29684029 |
Tania Ayllón1,2, Daniel Cardoso Portela Câmara2,3, Fernanda Cristina Morone2, Larissa da Silva Gonçalves2, Fábio Saito Monteiro de Barros4, Patrícia Brasil1, Marilia Sá Carvalho5, Nildimar Alves Honório2,3.
Abstract
Aedes albopictus, originally considered as a secondary vector for arbovirus transmission, especially in areas where this species co-exist with Aedes aegypti, has been described in most regions of the world. Dispersion and domiciliation of Ae. albopictus in a complex of densely urbanized slums in Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil, was evidenced. In this study, we tested the hypotheses that 1) Ae. albopictus distribution in urban slums is negatively related to distance from vegetation, and 2) these vectors have taken on a domestic life style with a portion of the population feeding, ovipositing, and resting indoors. To do this, we developed an integrated surveillance proposal, aiming to detect the presence and abundance of Aedes mosquitoes. The study, based on a febrile syndrome surveillance system in a cohort of infants living in the slum complex, was performed on a weekly basis between February 2014 and April 2017. A total of 8,418 adult mosquitoes (3,052 Ae. aegypti, 44 Ae. albopictus, 16 Ae. scapularis, 4 Ae. fluviatilis and 5,302 Culex quinquefasciatus) were collected by direct aspiration and 46,047 Aedes spp. eggs were collected by oviposition traps. The Asian tiger mosquito, Ae. albopictus, was aspirated in its adult form (n = 44), and immature forms of this species (n = 12) were identified from the eggs collected by the ovitraps. In most collection sites, co-occurrence of Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus was observed. Key-sites, such as junkyards, thrift stores, factories, tire repair shops and garages, had the higher abundance of Ae. albopictus, followed by schools and households. We collected Ae. albopictus at up to 400 meters to the nearest vegetation cover. The log transformed (n+1) number of females Ae. albopictus captured at each collection point was inversely related to the distance to the nearest vegetation border. These results show that Ae. albopictus, a competent vector for important arboviruses and more commonly found in areas with higher vegetation coverage, is present and spread in neglected and densely urbanized areas, being collected at a long distance from the typical encounter areas for this species. Besides, as Ae. albopictus can easily move between sylvatic and urban environment, the entomological monitoring of Ae. albopictus should be an integral part of mosquito surveillance and control. Finally, key-sites, characterized by high human influx and presence of potential Aedes breeding sites, should be included in entomological monitoring.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29684029 PMCID: PMC5912725 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Spatial distribution of collections of Aedes albopictus adults in Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro.
Yellow triangles, circles, and stars represent the households, key-sites and schools, respectively, where Ae. albopictus adults were collected.
Total number of mosquito adults collected in schools, key-sites and households in Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro from February 2014 to April 2017.
| Species | Collection sites | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Schools | Key-sites | Households | |
| Females | 302 | 535 | 103 |
| Engorged* | 219 | 348 | 72 |
| Males | 400 | 1573 | 139 |
| Subtotal | 702 | 2108 | 242 |
| Females | 3 | 26 | 2 |
| Engorged* | 2 | 14 | 2 |
| Males | 1 | 12 | 0 |
| Subtotal | 4 | 38 | 2 |
| Females | 7 | 0 | 3 |
| Engorged* | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Males | 5 | 1 | 0 |
| Subtotal | 12 | 1 | 3 |
| Females | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Engorged* | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Males | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Subtotal | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Females | 408 | 912 | 269 |
| Males | 1496 | 2106 | 111 |
| Subtotal | 1904 | 3018 | 380 |
Co-occurrence sites and number of Aedes spp. adults collected in the different sites positive for Ae. albopictus in Manguinhos complex during the study period (2014 to 2017).
| Collection sites | Distance to the nearest green border (mts) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | M | F | M | |||
| 269.3 | 1 | - | - | - | ||
| 146.5 | 1 | - | - | - | ||
| 183.6 | - | 1 | 1 | 5 | ||
| 280.0 | - | 1 | 5 | 2 | ||
| 167.1 | 10 | - | 19 | 62 | ||
| 397.9 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 8 | ||
| 259.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 171.4 | - | 2 | - | 1 | ||
| 101.7 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 66 | ||
| 114.6 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 223.0 | 8 | 3 | 12 | 53 | ||
| 165.9 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 14 | ||
| 137.8 | 2 | - | - | 4 | ||
F, female; M, male; -, no specimens collected.
Fig 2Monthly mean abundance of Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus during the three-year study period in Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro.
The figure shows the mean number of Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus mosquitoes collected per month during the study.
Fig 3Model of the log-transformed (n+1) abundance of Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus females collected in the study area as related to the distance to the nearest vegetation patch, in meters.
The figure shows the abundance of these species according to the distance, in meters, to the nearest vegetation border.