Literature DB >> 20871747

Desiccation and thermal tolerance of eggs and the coexistence of competing mosquitoes.

Steven A Juliano1, George F O'Meara, Jeneen R Morrill, Michele M Cutwa.   

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that differences in temperature and desiccation tolerances of eggs of the container-dwelling mosquitoes Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti influence whether invading A. albopictus coexist with or exclude A. aegypti in Florida. In the laboratory, egg mortality through 30 days for A. albopictus was strongly temperature and humidity dependent, with low humidity and high temperature producing greatest mortality. In contrast, mortality through 30 days and through 60 days for A. aegypti was very low and independent of temperature and humidity. Mortality through 90 days for A. aegypti showed significant effects of both temperature and humidity. In the field, the proportion of vases occupied by A. albopictus was significantly lower at four of six sites at the start of the wet season (after a dry period) versus well into the wet season (after containers had held water for weeks). The proportion of vases occupied by A. aegypti was independent of when during the wet season vases were sampled. These results imply that dry periods cause disproportionately greater mortality of A. albopictus eggs compared to A. aegypti eggs. Container occupancy at tire and cemetery sites was significantly related to two principal components derived from longterm average climate data. Occupancy of containers by A. albopictus was greatest at cool sites with little or no dry season, and decreased significantly with increasing mean temperature and increasing number of dry months. In contrast, occupancy of containers by A. aegypti was lowest at cool sites with little or no dry season, and increased significantly with increasing mean temperature and increasing dry season length, and decreased significantly with total precipitation and number of wet months. We suggest that local coexistence of these species is possible because warm, dry climates favor A. aegypti and alleviate effects of competition from A. albopictus via differential mortality of A. albopictus eggs.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 20871747      PMCID: PMC2944657          DOI: 10.1007/s004420100811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  12 in total

1.  Invertebrate carcasses as a resource for competing Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  M P Daugherty; B W Alto; S A Juliano
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.278

2.  Operational and scientific notes.

Authors:  Y Mekuria; M G Hyatt
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 0.917

3.  Aedes albopictus in the United States: current status and prospects for further spread.

Authors:  C G Moore
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 0.917

4.  Aedes albopictus distribution, abundance, and colonization in Lee County, Florida, and its effect on Aedes aegypti.

Authors:  J A Hornby; D E Moore; T W Miller
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 0.917

5.  Replacement of Aedes aegypti by Aedes albopictus in Mobile, Alabama.

Authors:  J H Hobbs; E A Hughes; B H Eichold
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 0.917

6.  Prospects for an invasion: competition between Aedes albopictus and native Aedes triseriatus.

Authors:  T P Livdahl; M S Willey
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-07-12       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Spread of Aedes albopictus and decline of Ae. aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in Florida.

Authors:  G F O'Meara; L F Evans; A D Gettman; J P Cuda
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.278

8.  Biology and distribution of Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti in Madagascar.

Authors:  D Fontenille; F Rodhain
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 0.917

9.  Development and survival of immature Aedes albopictus and Aedes triseriatus (Diptera: Culicidae) in the laboratory: effects of density, food, and competition on response to temperature.

Authors:  H J Teng; C S Apperson
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.278

10.  Distributional records for Aedes mosquitoes from the U.S. Air Force ovitrapping program-1992.

Authors:  C P McHugh
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 0.917

View more
  90 in total

Review 1.  Why is Aedes aegypti Linnaeus so Successful as a Species?

Authors:  F D Carvalho; L A Moreira
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 1.434

2.  Selective oviposition of the mayfly Baetis bicaudatus.

Authors:  Andrea C Encalada; Barbara L Peckarsky
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Ecology of invasive mosquitoes: effects on resident species and on human health.

Authors:  Steven A Juliano; L Philip Lounibos
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 4.  Competitive displacement and reduction.

Authors:  L P Lounibos
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 0.917

5.  Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Abundance Model Improved With Relative Humidity and Precipitation-Driven Egg Hatching.

Authors:  Joceline Lega; Heidi E Brown; Roberto Barrera
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.278

6.  Frequency of Aedes sp. Linnaeus (Diptera: Culicidae) and Associated Entomofauna in Bromeliads from a Forest Patch within a densely Urbanized Area.

Authors:  T N Docile; R Figueiró; N A Honório; D F Baptista; G Pereira; J A A Dos Santos; C T Codeço
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 1.434

7.  Geographical gradient of mean age of dengue haemorrhagic fever patients in northern Thailand.

Authors:  Y Nagao; A Tawatsin; S Thammapalo; U Thavara
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 2.451

8.  Widespread evidence for interspecific mating between Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in nature.

Authors:  I E Bargielowski; L P Lounibos; D Shin; C T Smartt; M C Carrasquilla; A Henry; J C Navarro; C Paupy; J A Dennett
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.342

9.  Rapid evolution of reduced receptivity to interspecific mating in the dengue vector Aedes aegypti in response to satyrization by invasive Aedes albopictus.

Authors:  I Bargielowski; L P Lounibos
Journal:  Evol Ecol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 2.717

10.  Interpopulation divergence in competitive interactions of the mosquito Aedes albopictus.

Authors:  P T Leisnham; L P Lounibos; G F O'Meara; S A Juliano
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.499

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.