Literature DB >> 15024640

A field test for competitive effects of Aedes albopictus on A. aegypti in South Florida: differences between sites of coexistence and exclusion?

Steven A Juliano1, L Philip Lounibos, George F O'Meara.   

Abstract

We tested whether interspecific competition from Aedes albopictus had measurable effects on A. aegypti at the typical numbers of larval mosquitoes found in cemetery vases in south Florida. We also tested whether the effect of interspecific competition from A. albopictus on A. aegypti differed between sites where A. aegypti either persists or went extinct following invasion by A. albopictus. Similar experiments manipulating numbers of A. albopictus in cemetery vases were conducted at three sites of A. aegypti persistence and three sites where A. aegypti was apparently extinct. The experiments were done using numbers of larvae that were determined by observed numbers of larvae for each site, and with resources (leaf detritus) that accumulated in experimental vases placed into each field site. In both the early rainy season (when number of mosquito larvae was low) and the late rainy season (when number of mosquito larvae was high), there was a significant effect of treatment on developmental progress of experimental A. aegypti. In the late rainy season, when numbers of larvae were high, there was also a significant effect of treatment on survivorship of A. aegypti. However, the competition treatment x site type (A. aegyptipersists vs extinct) interaction was never significant, indicating that the competitive effect of A. albopictus on A. aegypti did not differ systematically between persistence versus extinction sites. Thus, although competition from A. albopictus is strong under field conditions at all sites, we find no evidence that variation in the impact of interspecific competition is associated with coexistence or exclusion. Interspecific competition among larvae is thus a viable explanation for exclusion or reduction of A. aegypti in south Florida, but variation in the persistence of A. aegypti following invasion does not seem to be primarily a product of variation in the conditions in the aquatic environments of cemetery vases. Copyright 2004 Springer-Verlag

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15024640      PMCID: PMC1906877          DOI: 10.1007/s00442-004-1532-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  28 in total

Review 1.  Invasions by insect vectors of human disease.

Authors:  L Philip Lounibos
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Invertebrate carcasses as a resource for competing Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  M P Daugherty; B W Alto; S A Juliano
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.278

3.  Desiccation and thermal tolerance of eggs and the coexistence of competing mosquitoes.

Authors:  Steven A Juliano; George F O'Meara; Jeneen R Morrill; Michele M Cutwa
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Why do female Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) feed preferentially and frequently on human blood?

Authors:  L C Harrington; J D Edman; T W Scott
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.278

5.  Aedes albopictus in the United States: current status and prospects for further spread.

Authors:  C G Moore
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 0.917

6.  Does temperature affect the outcome of larval competition between Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus?

Authors:  L P Lounibos; S Suárez; Z Menéndez; N Nishimura; R L Escher; S M O'Connell; J R Rey
Journal:  J Vector Ecol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.671

7.  Replacement of Aedes aegypti by Aedes albopictus in Mobile, Alabama.

Authors:  J H Hobbs; E A Hughes; B H Eichold
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 0.917

8.  Convergent habitat segregation of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in southeastern Brazil and Florida.

Authors:  Marieta A H Braks; Nildimar A Honório; Ricardo Lourençqo-De-Oliveira; Steven A Juliano; L Philip Lounibos
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.278

9.  Prospects for an invasion: competition between Aedes albopictus and native Aedes triseriatus.

Authors:  T P Livdahl; M S Willey
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-07-12       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Development and survival of immature Aedes albopictus and Aedes triseriatus (Diptera: Culicidae) in the laboratory: effects of density, food, and competition on response to temperature.

Authors:  H J Teng; C S Apperson
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.278

View more
  82 in total

1.  Asymmetrical competition and patterns of abundance of Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  Katie S Costanzo; Kimberly Mormann; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.278

2.  Larval feeding behavior of three co-occurring species of container mosquitoes.

Authors:  Donald A Yee; Banugopan Kesavaraju; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  J Vector Ecol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.671

3.  Ecology of invasive mosquitoes: effects on resident species and on human health.

Authors:  Steven A Juliano; L Philip Lounibos
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 4.  Competitive displacement and reduction.

Authors:  L P Lounibos
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 0.917

Review 5.  Population dynamics.

Authors:  Steven A Juliano
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 0.917

6.  Abundance of immature Anopheles and culicines (Diptera: Culicidae) in different water body types in the urban environment of Malindi, Kenya.

Authors:  Daniel E Impoinvil; Joseph Keating; Charles M Mbogo; Matthew D Potts; Rinku Roy Chowdhury; John C Beier
Journal:  J Vector Ecol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.671

7.  Larval competition between Aedes japonicus and Aedes atropalpus (Diptera: Culicidae) in simulated rock pools.

Authors:  Jennifer S Armistead; Naoya Nishimura; Richard L Escher; L Philip Lounibos
Journal:  J Vector Ecol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.671

8.  Aedes Anphevirus: an Insect-Specific Virus Distributed Worldwide in Aedes aegypti Mosquitoes That Has Complex Interplays with Wolbachia and Dengue Virus Infection in Cells.

Authors:  Rhys Parry; Sassan Asgari
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Climate change influences on global distributions of dengue and chikungunya virus vectors.

Authors:  Lindsay P Campbell; Caylor Luther; David Moo-Llanes; Janine M Ramsey; Rogelio Danis-Lozano; A Townsend Peterson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Differential responses of the mosquito Aedes albopictus from the Indian Ocean region to two chikungunya isolates.

Authors:  Estelle Martin; Sara Moutailler; Yoann Madec; Anna-Bella Failloux
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 2.964

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.