| Literature DB >> 29682207 |
David S Guttery1, Kevin Blighe1, Konstantinos Polymeros1,2,3, R Paul Symonds1, Salvador Macip3, Esther L Moss1,2.
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) is now the most prevalent gynaecological malignancy in the Western world. Black or African American women (BoAA) have double the mortality of Caucasian women, and their tumours tend to be of higher grade. Despite these disparities, little is known regarding the mutational landscape of EC between races. Hence, we wished to investigate the molecular features of ECs within The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset by racial groupings. In total 374 Caucasian, 109 BoAA and 20 Asian patients were included in the analysis. Asian women were diagnosed at younger age, 54.2 years versus 64.5 years for Caucasian and 64.9 years for BoAA women (OR 3.432; p=0.011); BoAA women were more likely to have serous type tumors (OR 2.061; p=0.008). No difference in overall survival was evident. The most frequently mutated gene in Caucasian and Asian tumours was PTEN (63% and 85%), unlike BoAA cases where it was TP53 (49%). Mutation and somatic copy number alteration (SCNA) analysis revealed an enrichment of TP53 mutations in BoAAs; whereas POLE and RPL22 mutations were more frequent in Caucasians. Major recurrent SCNA racial differences were observed at chromosomes 3p, 8, 10, and 16, which clustered BoAA tumors into 4 distinct groups and Caucasian tumors into 5 groups. There was a significantly higher frequency of somatic mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes in Asian tumours, in particular PMS2 (p=0.0036). In conclusion, inherent racial disparities appear to be present in the molecular profile of EC, which could have potential implications on clinical management.Entities:
Keywords: TCGA; endometrial cancer; ethnicity; somatic copy number aberrations
Year: 2018 PMID: 29682207 PMCID: PMC5908308 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24907
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Description of endometrial cancer cohort
| Characteristic | Sub-category | Caucasian (n=374) | Asian (n=20) | p | OR (95% CI) | BoAA (n=109) | p | OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age at diagnosis | ≤55 | 72 (19.3) | 9 (45) | 3.432 (1.338-8.6) | 16 (14.7) | 0.27 | 0.722 (0.389-1.272) | |
| >55 | 302 (80.7) | 11 (55) | - | - | 93 (85.3) | - | - | |
| BMI | Obese | 211 (56.4) | 7 (35) | 0.19 | 0.351 (0.1164-NA) | 67 (61.5) | 2.937 (1.420-6.887) | |
| Overweight | 73 (19.5) | 6 (30) | - | 0.869 (0.268-NA) | 22 (20.2) | - | 2.788 (1.207-7.042) | |
| Underweight | 3 (0.8) | 0 (0) | - | NA | 0 (0) | - | NA | |
| Unknown | 13 (3.5) | 0 (0) | - | NA | 12 (11) | - | 8.539 (2.988-25.966) | |
| Normal | 74 (19.8) | 7 (35) | - | - | 8 (7.3) | - | - | |
| Clinical stage | I | 245 (65.5) | 14 (70) | - | - | 57 (52.3) | - | - |
| II | 33 (8.8) | 3 (10) | - | 1.061 (0.162-4.025) | 12 (11.) | - | 1.563 (0.735-3.144) | |
| III | 79 (21.1) | 2 (15) | - | 0.665 (0.15-2.1) | 32 (29.4) | - | 1.741 (1.047-2.864) | |
| IV | 17 (4.6) | 1 (5) | 0.93 | 1.029 (0.055-5.615) | 8 (7.3) | 0.094 | 2.023 (0.792-4.79) | |
| Histologic grade | G1 | 75 (20.1) | 6 (30) | - | - | 14 (12.8) | - | - |
| G2 | 88 (23.5) | 4 (20) | - | 0.568 (0.141-2.063) | 26 (23.9) | - | 1.583 (0.781-3.32) | |
| G3 | 211 (56.4) | 10 (50) | 0.59 | 0.592 (0.213-1.793) | 69 (63.3) | 0.2 | 1.803 (0.995-3.41) | |
| Histologic type | Endometrioid | 293 (78.3) | 17 (85) | - | - | 69 (63.3) | - | - |
| Serous | 68 (18.2) | 3 (15) | 0.46 | 0.76 (0.174-2.344) | 33 (30.3) | 2.061 (1.252-3.356) | ||
| Mixed | 13 (3.5) | 0 (0) | - | NA | 7 (6.4) | - | 2.287 (0.832-5.803) |
Characteristics showing evidence of racial disparity included age at diagnosis, BMI, and histologic type (p<0.05), but no statistically significant differences for histologic grade. Clinical stage exhibited a trend toward racial disparity. All p values and odds ratios (ORs) are derived from χ2 ANOVA on a multinomial logistic regression model with race as outcome, with levels ordered as Caucasian, BoAA, and Asian. Reference categories for reference models: race, Caucasian; age at diagnosis, >55; BMI, normal; clinical stage, stage I; histologic grade, G1; histologic type, endometrioid.
Recurrently mutated genes differing by ethnicity
| Caucasian | Asian | BoAA | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene | n (%) | Gene | n (%) | Gene | n (%) |
| 229 (63.26) | 17 (85) | 52 (49.06) | |||
| 181 (50) | 13 (65) | 41 (38.68) | |||
| 159 (43.92) | 9 (45) | 41 (38.68) | |||
| 115 (31.77) | 6 (30) | 30 (28.3) | |||
| 98 (27.07) | 6 (30) | 24 (22.64) | |||
| 86 (23.76) | 6 (30) | 20 (18.87) | |||
| 76 (21) | 5 (25) | 18 (16.98) | |||
| 71 (19.61) | 5 (25) | 17 (16.04) | |||
| 64 (17.68) | 5 (25) | 15 (14.15) | |||
| 62 (17.13) | 3 (15) | 13 (12.26) | |||
| 50 (13.81) | 3 (15) | 12 (11.32) | |||
| 41 (11.33) | 2 (10) | 8 (7.55) | |||
Figure 1Recurrent genome-wide SNCAs in each race
Genome-wide amplifications and deletions in BoAAs (A) and Caucasians (B). Recurrent SCNA in the GISTIC 2.0 SCNA data was calculated using GAIA [42] with known common CNV filtered out. Recurrent CNV were defined by FDR Q<0.15 using ten iterations. Genomic SCNA plots were generated using a custom R script, with cut-off defined also at FDR Q<0.15 for the purposes of visualisation. Large genomic differences in recurrent SCNA profiles were observed between each race.
Figure 2Heatmap of significant SCNA groups in BoAA and Caucasians
Clustering was performed on the copy number segment mean for each recurrent SCNA region passing FDR Q<0.15. Dendrograms were generated using Euclidean distance and Ward's linkage. To identify groups of SCNA profiles in each race, we cut the dendrogram tree at different heights in order to isolate groups that fit the patterns of SCNA in the heatmap. For heatmap shading, we used a 100-element colour palette of darkblue-to-white-to-darkred and set breaks at −1 and+1.
Figure 3Mutational profiles across endometrial cancers in BoAA and Caucasian patients
Mutation frequencies (vertical axis) are plotted for each tumor (horizontal axis) for BoAAs (A) and Caucasians (B). Details are given regarding patients demographics. Only patients with mutations are illustrated. See Supplementary Table 5 for full details of cohort numbers and groupings.
Figure 4Survival analysis of each group
Kaplain-Meier curves by ethnicity showing 2 groups with significantly poorer outcome in Caucasians.