| Literature DB >> 28596308 |
Dung T Le1,2,3, Jennifer N Durham1,2,3, Kellie N Smith1,3, Hao Wang3, Bjarne R Bartlett2,4, Laveet K Aulakh2,4, Steve Lu2,4, Holly Kemberling3, Cara Wilt3, Brandon S Luber3, Fay Wong2,4, Nilofer S Azad1,3, Agnieszka A Rucki1,3, Dan Laheru3, Ross Donehower3, Atif Zaheer5, George A Fisher6, Todd S Crocenzi7, James J Lee8, Tim F Greten9, Austin G Duffy9, Kristen K Ciombor10, Aleksandra D Eyring11, Bao H Lam11, Andrew Joe11, S Peter Kang11, Matthias Holdhoff3, Ludmila Danilova1,3, Leslie Cope1,3, Christian Meyer3, Shibin Zhou1,3,4, Richard M Goldberg12, Deborah K Armstrong3, Katherine M Bever3, Amanda N Fader13, Janis Taube1,3, Franck Housseau1,3, David Spetzler14, Nianqing Xiao14, Drew M Pardoll1,3, Nickolas Papadopoulos3,4, Kenneth W Kinzler3,4, James R Eshleman15, Bert Vogelstein1,3,4, Robert A Anders1,3,15, Luis A Diaz16,2,3.
Abstract
The genomes of cancers deficient in mismatch repair contain exceptionally high numbers of somatic mutations. In a proof-of-concept study, we previously showed that colorectal cancers with mismatch repair deficiency were sensitive to immune checkpoint blockade with antibodies to programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1). We have now expanded this study to evaluate the efficacy of PD-1 blockade in patients with advanced mismatch repair-deficient cancers across 12 different tumor types. Objective radiographic responses were observed in 53% of patients, and complete responses were achieved in 21% of patients. Responses were durable, with median progression-free survival and overall survival still not reached. Functional analysis in a responding patient demonstrated rapid in vivo expansion of neoantigen-specific T cell clones that were reactive to mutant neopeptides found in the tumor. These data support the hypothesis that the large proportion of mutant neoantigens in mismatch repair-deficient cancers make them sensitive to immune checkpoint blockade, regardless of the cancers' tissue of origin.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28596308 PMCID: PMC5576142 DOI: 10.1126/science.aan6733
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Science ISSN: 0036-8075 Impact factor: 47.728