B Long1, F W Liu, R E Bristow. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to comprehensively review the scientific literature and summarize the available data regarding the outcome disparities of African American women with uterine cancer. METHODS: Literature on disparities in uterine cancer was systematically reviewed using the PubMed search engine. Articles from 1992 to 2012 written in English were reviewed. Search terms included endometrial cancer, uterine cancer, racial disparities, and African American. RESULTS: Twenty-four original research articles with a total of 366,299 cases of endometrial cancer (337,597 Caucasian and 28,702 African American) were included. Compared to Caucasian women, African American women comprise 7% of new endometrial cancer cases, while accounting for approximately 14% of endometrial cancer deaths. They are diagnosed with later stage, higher-grade disease, and poorer prognostic histologic types compared to their Caucasian counterparts. They also suffer worse outcomes at every stage, grade, and for every histologic type. The cause of increased mortality is multifactorial. African American and white women have varying incidence of comorbid conditions, genetic susceptibility to malignancy, access to care and health coverage, and socioeconomic status; however, the most consistent contributors to incidence and mortality disparities are histology and socioeconomics. More robust genetic and molecular profile studies are in development to further explain histologic differences. CONCLUSIONS: Current studies suggest that histologic and socioeconomic factors explain much of the disparity in endometrial cancer incidence and mortality between white and African American patients. Treatment factors likely contributed historically to differences in mortality; however, studies suggest most women now receive equal care. Molecular differences may be an important factor to explain the racial inequities. Coupled with a sustained commitment to increasing access to appropriate care, on-going research in biologic mechanisms underlying histopathologic differences will help address and reduce the number of African American women who disproportionately suffer and die from endometrial malignancy.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to comprehensively review the scientific literature and summarize the available data regarding the outcome disparities of African American women with uterine cancer. METHODS: Literature on disparities in uterine cancer was systematically reviewed using the PubMed search engine. Articles from 1992 to 2012 written in English were reviewed. Search terms included endometrial cancer, uterine cancer, racial disparities, and African American. RESULTS: Twenty-four original research articles with a total of 366,299 cases of endometrial cancer (337,597 Caucasian and 28,702 African American) were included. Compared to Caucasian women, African American women comprise 7% of new endometrial cancer cases, while accounting for approximately 14% of endometrial cancer deaths. They are diagnosed with later stage, higher-grade disease, and poorer prognostic histologic types compared to their Caucasian counterparts. They also suffer worse outcomes at every stage, grade, and for every histologic type. The cause of increased mortality is multifactorial. African American and white women have varying incidence of comorbid conditions, genetic susceptibility to malignancy, access to care and health coverage, and socioeconomic status; however, the most consistent contributors to incidence and mortality disparities are histology and socioeconomics. More robust genetic and molecular profile studies are in development to further explain histologic differences. CONCLUSIONS: Current studies suggest that histologic and socioeconomic factors explain much of the disparity in endometrial cancer incidence and mortality between white and African American patients. Treatment factors likely contributed historically to differences in mortality; however, studies suggest most women now receive equal care. Molecular differences may be an important factor to explain the racial inequities. Coupled with a sustained commitment to increasing access to appropriate care, on-going research in biologic mechanisms underlying histopathologic differences will help address and reduce the number of African American women who disproportionately suffer and die from endometrial malignancy.
Authors: J I Risinger; K Hayes; G L Maxwell; M E Carney; R K Dodge; J C Barrett; A Berchuck Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Linh M Duong; Reda J Wilson; Umed A Ajani; Simple D Singh; Christie R Eheman Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2011-06-17 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Zaid Al-Wahab; Rouba Ali-Fehmi; Michele L Cote; Mohamed A Elshaikh; Dina R Ibrahim; Assaad Semaan; Daniel Schultz; Robert T Morris; Adnan R Munkarah Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2011-03-04 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Terri Madison; David Schottenfeld; Sherman A James; Ann G Schwartz; Stephen B Gruber Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Jocelyn M Weiss; Babette S Saltzman; Jennifer A Doherty; Lynda F Voigt; Chu Chen; Shirley A A Beresford; Deirdre A Hill; Noel S Weiss Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2006-05-04 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Sarah E Ferguson; Adam B Olshen; Douglas A Levine; Agnès Viale; Richard R Barakat; Jeff Boyd Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2005-12-27 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: M F Kohler; P Carney; R Dodge; J T Soper; D L Clarke-Pearson; J R Marks; A Berchuck Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 1996-11 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Jay E Allard; Gadisetti V R Chandramouli; Katherine Stagliano; Brian L Hood; Tracy Litzi; Yutaka Shoji; Jeff Boyd; Andrew Berchuck; Thomas P Conrads; G Larry Maxwell; John I Risinger Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2012-07-04 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: M L Cote; J J Ruterbusch; Q Ahmed; S Bandyopadhyay; B Alosh; E Abdulfatah; S Seward; R Morris; R Ali-Fehmi Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Barenya Mukerji; Caitlin Baptiste; Ling Chen; Ana I Tergas; June Y Hou; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2018-01-05 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Julie J Ruterbusch; Rouba Ali-Fehmi; Sara H Olson; Shawnita Sealy-Jefferson; Benjamin A Rybicki; Sharon Hensley-Alford; Mohamed A Elshaikh; Arthur R Gaba; Daniel Schultz; Adnan R Munkarah; Michele L Cote Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2014-06-19 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Kemi M Doll; Ethan M Basch; Ke Meng; Emma L Barber; Paola A Gehrig; Wendy R Brewster; Anne-Marie Meyer Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Mary Puckett; Julie Townsend; Jenny Rees Patterson; Donna Shaw; Yvonne Wasilewski; Sherri L Stewart Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2019-08-02 Impact factor: 2.681