| Literature DB >> 29677105 |
Débora da Silva Baldivia1, Eliana Janet Sanjinez-Argandonã2, Kátia Ávila Antunes3, Izabel Cristina Freitas Moraes4, Edson Lucas Dos Santos5, Kely de Picoli Souza6.
Abstract
The fatty acids found in nuts are important regulators of the metabolism. These acids are frequently associated with a reduction of serum cholesterol and body fat and a lower risk of developing cardiovascular disease. In this context, the aim of this study was to identify and quantify the nut oil fatty acids from Attalea phalerata and investigate their metabolic effects in rats with hyperlipidemia induced by a diet rich in fructose. Oleic and lauric acids were the major compounds found in the A. phalerata nut oil (APNO). Hyperlipidemic rats treated with APNO showed a reduction in the total serum cholesterol similar to those treated with simvastatin, an increased body temperature by 1 °C, and a reduction in the body weight gain and mesenteric depot of white adipose tissue compared to the hyperlipidemic controls rats. There was an increase in the relative liver weight of rats treated with APNO, without, however, any change in the serum markers of hepatic toxicity. In addition, there was an increase in the moisture and lipid content of the feces of the rats treated with APNO compared to the controls. Together, these results suggest that APNO has potential use in health foods and nutritional supplements to control hypercholesterolemia and obesity.Entities:
Keywords: bacuri; body weight; fatty acid; hypercholesterolemia; visceral adiposity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29677105 PMCID: PMC6017791 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23040960
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Fatty acid composition of A. phalerata nut oil (APNO).
| Fatty Acid | APNO (g·100 g−1 of Total Fatty Acid) |
|---|---|
| SAFA | |
| Caproic acid (C 6:0) | 0.27 |
| Caprylic acid (C 8:0) | 3.84 |
| Capric acid (C 10:0) | 4.13 |
| Lauric acid (C 12:0) | 28.87 |
| Myristic acid (C 14:0) | 12.00 |
| Pentadecanoic acid (C 15:0) | 0.03 |
| Palmitic acid (C 16:0) | 10. 70 |
| Margaric acid (C 17:0) | 0.04 |
| Stearic acid (C18:0) | 4.24 |
| Eicosanoic acid (C 20:0) | 0.10 |
| Docosanoic acid (C 22:0) | 0.02 |
| Lignoceric acid (C 24:0) | 0.07 |
|
|
|
| MUFA | |
| Palmitoleic acid (C16:1 n-7) | 0.06 |
| cis-10-heptadecenoic acid (C 17:1) | 0.03 |
| Oleic acid (C18:1 n-9) | 30.70 |
| Eicosenoic acid (C 20:1 n-9) | 0.11 |
|
|
|
| PUFA | |
| Linoleic acid (C 18:2 n-6) | 4.75 |
| α-Linolenic (C 18:3 n-3) | 0.04 |
|
|
|
| Total fatty acid | 100 |
SAFA = saturated fatty acid; MUFA = monounsaturated fatty acid; PUFA = polyunsaturated fatty acid.
The daily mean by animal of food (g) and water (mL) ingestion, and the relative mass of white adipose tissue depots, skeletal muscle, and organs of normolipidemic rats (Control) and high-fructose diet-induced hyperlipidemic rats treated with water (HFD) and A. phalerata nut oil (1.2 mL·Kg−1 of body weight, HFD + APNO) for 63 days.
| Parameters | Groups | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Control ( | HFD ( | HFD + APNO ( | |
|
| |||
| Food intake (g/day) | 23.40 ± 0.70 a | 26.74 ± 1.07 b | 25.30 ± 1.03 ab |
| Water intake (mL/day) | 47.97 ± 1.32 a | 36.71 ± 0.82 b | 31.06 ± 0.61 c |
| Mesenteric | 0.80 ± 0.05 a | 0.96 ± 0.09 ab | 0.72 ± 0.04 ac |
| Retroperitoneal | 2.27 ± 0.22 a | 1.92 ± 0.10 a | 1.97 ± 0.19 a |
| Epididymal | 1.77 ± 0.14 a | 1.17 ± 0.15 b | 1.32 ± 0.10 b |
| Inguinal subcutaneous | 0.14 ± 0.03 a | 0.28 ± 0.01 b | 0.28 ± 0.03 b |
| EDL | 0.014 ± 0.001 a | 0.014 ± 0.001 a | 0.016 ± 0.002 a |
| Soleus | 0.033 ± 0.002 a | 0.028 ± 0.002 a | 0.029 ± 0.001 a |
| Spleen | 0.117 ± 0.040 a | 0.115 ± 0.002 a | 0.105 ± 0.003 a |
| Heart | 0.321 ± 0.013 a | 0.347 ± 0.010 ab | 0.320 ± 0.006 ac |
| Liver | 2.860 ± 0.045 a | 2.720 ± 0.054 a | 3.230 ± 0.135 b |
| Lung | 0.522 ± 0.068 a | 0.486 ± 0.027 a | 0.436 ± 0.023 a |
| Kidney | 0.601 ± 0.026 a | 0.545 ± 0.018 ab | 0.602 ± 0.014 ac |
|
| |||
| Liver | 13.92 ± 0.76 a | 8.83 ± 0.79 b | 17.04 ± 1.70 a |
EDL = extensor digitorum longus. Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. The data were analyzed by One-way ANOVA test followed by Student Newman–Keuls post-test. Different superscript letters between columns indicate significant differences at P < 0.05.
The metabolic parameters of high-fructose diet-induced hyperlipidemic rats treated with water (HFD) or A. phalerata nut oil (HFD + APNO) made available for 24 h in metabolic cages.
| Parameters | Experimental Groups | |
|---|---|---|
| HFD ( | HFD + APNO ( | |
| Food intake (g) | 17.90 ± 1.38 | 19.86 ± 1.55 |
| Water intake (mL) | 17.93 ± 1.91 | 14.88 ± 0.85 |
| Urinary excretion (mL) | 5.00 ± 1.13 | 1.64 ± 0.34 ** |
| Feces (g) | 4.72 ± 0.50 | 4.69 ± 0.51 |
| Humidity of feces (%) | 24.24 ± 0.13 | 48.93 ± 0.23 *** |
| Dry feces (%) | 75.75 ± 0.12 | 51.06 ± 0.23 *** |
| Lipid of feces (%) | 2.26 ± 0.07 | 2.99 ± 0.11 * |
| Anal temperature (° C) | 35.67 ± 0.55 | 36.95 ± 0.24 * |
Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. HFD versus HFD + APNO. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. The data was analyzed by Unpaired t-test non-parametric tests. HFD versus HFD + APNO. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001.
Figure 1(a) Body mass evolution and (b) total body weight gain of normolipidemic rats (Control) and high-fructose diet-induced hyperlipidemic rats treated with water (HFD) or A. phalerata nut oil (1.2 mg·Kg–1 of body weight, HFD + APNO) for 63 days. Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. n = 8 animals per group. The data was analyzed by one-way ANOVA test followed by a Student Newman–Keuls post-test. Different superscript letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05.
The biochemical, hepatic, and renal parameters of normolipidemic rats (Control) and high-fructose-diet-induced hyperlipidemic rats treated with water (HFD), ciprofibrate (2 mg·Kg−1 of body weight, HFD + C), simvastatin (30 mg·Kg−1 of body weight, HFD + S) and A. phalerata nut oil (1.2 mL·Kg−1 of body weight, HFD + APNO) for 63 days.
| Parameters | Groups | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control ( | HFD ( | HFD + C ( | HFD + S ( | HFD + APNO ( | |
| TG (mg·dL−1) | 113.0 ± 5.2 a | 241.2 ± 28.1 b | 155.1 ± 14.2 a | 118.9 ± 7.0 a | 243.0 ± 20.0 b |
| TC (mg·dL−1) | 79.0 ± 2.01 a | 117.2 ± 12.9 b | 84.4 ± 4.3 a | 90.3 ± 5.2 a | 93.3 ± 2.5 a |
| HDL (mg·dL−1) | 45.08 ± 2.44 a | 54.59 ± 3.79 a | 47.54 ± 2.35 a | 54.11 ± 3.11 a | 49.07 ± 1.73 a |
| LDL (mg·dL−1) | 11.32 ± 2.40 a | 19.73 ± 3.19a | 8.74 ± 2.83 a | 17.25 ± 5.18 a | 13.94 ± 7.07 a |
| ALT (U·L−1) | 53.2 ± 3.3 a | 65.4 ± 7.0 a | 65.0 ± 4.1 a | 64.8 ± 5.7 a | 66.1 ± 7.5 a |
| AST (U·L−1) | 174.0 ± 6.5 a | 178.0 ± 14.5 a | 195.0 ± 16.0 a | 219.5 ± 19.7 a | 170.8 ± 11.9 a |
| CR (U·L−1) | 0.3 ± 0.0 a | 0.3 ± 0.0 a | 0.3 ± 0.0 a | 0.3 ± 0.0 a | 0.3 ± 0.0 a |
| UREA | 22.9 ± 1.9 a | 30.0 ± 3.0 a | 25.9 ± 3.7 a | 20.9 ± 1.4 a | 19.8 ± 1.9 a |
TG = serum triglycerides; TC = serum total cholesterol; ALT = alanine aminotransferase; AST = aspartate aminotransferase; CR = creatinine. Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. The data was analyzed by one-way ANOVA test followed by Student Newman–Keuls post-test. Different superscript letters between columns indicate significant differences at P < 0.05.
The proximal composition of diets.
| Diet | Humidity (%) | Lipids (%) | Ashes (%) | Proteins (%) | Carbohydrate (%) | Energy (Kcal∙100g−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD | 10.70 ± 0.04 | 1.50 ± 0.12 | 8.21 ± 0.14 | 26.14 ± 0.95 | 59.40 ± 0.64 | 332.51 ± 0.46 |
| HFD | 3.98 ± 0.12 | 0.35 ± 0.00 | 3.04 ± 0.08 | 14.28 ± 1.80 | 84.39 ± 0.43 | 374.26 ± 0.64 |
CD = standard chow diet; HFD = high-fructose diet.