| Literature DB >> 24693447 |
Dinesh Dhingra1, Deepak Lamba1, Ramesh Kumar2, Pashupati Nath2, Satyaprakash Gauttam3.
Abstract
The present study was designed to investigate antihyperlipidemic activity of dried pulp of Aloe succotrina leaves in Wistar albino rats. Hyperlipidemia was induced in rats by feeding them high fat diet (HFD) or D-fructose (25% w/v) for 4 successive weeks. From 15th to 28th day, dried pulp (100 and 200 mg/kg, p.o) and atorvastatin (10 mg/kg, p.o.) per se were administered 2 h prior to feeding rats with HFD or fructose. Aloe succotrina did not significantly decrease the body weight of rats. The dried pulp and atorvastatin per se significantly decreased relative liver weight but did not significantly affect relative heart weight. HFD or fructose significantly increased serum total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL-c, and VLDL, and decreased HDL-c; significantly increased liver MDA and decreased GSH levels. The dried pulp (200 mg/kg p.o.) significantly reversed high fat diet-induced and fructose-induced hyperlipidemia and atherogenic index. Aloe succotrina significantly decreased HMG Co-A reductase activity. Antihyperlipidemic effect of the dried pulp was comparable to atorvastatin. Thus, Aloe succotrina produced significant antihyperlipidemic activity in both HFD and fructose-induced hyperlipidemic rats, possibly through normalization of serum lipid profile, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitory activity, and amelioration of oxidative stress in liver.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24693447 PMCID: PMC3945430 DOI: 10.1155/2014/243575
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISRN Pharmacol ISSN: 2090-5165
Effect of dried pulp of Aloe succotrina leaves on body weight of HFD-induced hyperlipidemic rats.
| Group |
Treatment |
Dose |
Number | Body weight (g) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 0 | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | ||||
| 1 | Vehicle (1% w/v CMC) | 10 mL | 6 | 83.16 ± 3.98 | 87.66 ± 4.09 | 95.5 ± 3.77 | 103.33 ± 4.82 | 104.33 ± 4.78 |
| 2 | Vehicle (1% w/v CMC) + HFD | 10 mL | 6 | 82.33 ± 2.96 | 102.16 ± 3.19a | 112.66 ± 4.73c | 129.66 ± 5.90c | 136.00 ± 5.75c |
| 3 | Atorvastatin + HFD | 10 mg | 3 | 83.00 ± 4.44 | 98.16 ± 5.16 | 118.16 ± 8.37 | 124.00 ± 8.09 | 133.33 ± 11.86 |
| 4 |
| 100 mg | 5 | 79.16 ± 3.92 | 101.83 ± 5.134 | 124.5 ± 5.74 | 106.66 ± 5.48 | 115.8 ± 16.33 |
| 5 |
| 200 mg | 5 | 81.83 ± 5.13 | 104.00 ± 7.17 | 129.83 ± 8.25 | 138.83 ± 6.98 | 150.6 ± 7.36 |
In each group; values are in Mean ± SEM; data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test.
F (4, 25) = 21.29; P < 0.0001 (for HFD treated control from week 0 to week 4).
F (4, 25) = 1.636; P < 0.1964 (comparison among various groups at week 1).
F (4, 25) = 4.207; P < 0.0097 (comparison among various groups at week 2).
F (4, 25) = 5.585; P < 0.0024 (comparison among various groups at week 3).
F (4, 20) = 7.901; P < 0.0005 (comparison among various groups at week 4).
a P < 0.05 and c P < 0.001 as compared to HFD treated control (week 0).
Effect of dried pulp of Aloe succotrina leaves on relative liver and heart weight of HFD-induced hyperlipidemic rats.
| Group number | Treatment (p.o.) | Dose (kg−1) | Number of animals | Relative organ weight | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liver weight | Heart weight | ||||
| 1 | Vehicle (1% w/v CMC) | 10 mL | 6 | 4.98 ± 0.32 | 0.63 ± 0.07 |
| 2 | Vehicle (1% w/v CMC) + HFD | 10 mL | 6 | 7.80 ± 0.54### | 0.70 ± 0.04 |
| 3 | Atorvastatin + HFD | 10 mg | 3 | 5.77 ± 0.31a | 0.59 ± 0.06 |
| 4 |
| 100 mg | 5 | 6.87 ± 0.32 | 0.64 ± 0.04 |
| 5 |
| 200 mg | 5 | 5.81 ± 0.34a | 0.60 ± 0.02 |
Relative weight = (organ weight/body weight) × 100. Values are in Mean ± SEM; data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test.
F (4, 20) = 8.271; P < 0.0004 (for relative liver weight).
F (4, 20) = 0.747; P < 0.5715 (for relative heart weight).
### P < 0.001 as compared to vehicle treated control; a P < 0.05 as compared to HFD treated control.
Effect of dried pulp of Aloe succotrina leaves on serum lipid levels in HFD-induced hyperlipidemic rats.
| Group number | Treatment (p.o.) | Dose (kg−1) | Lipid levels (mg/dL) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC | TG | HDL-c | VLDL | LDL-c | AI (TG/HDL) | |||
| 1 | Vehicle (1% w/v CMC) ( | 10 mL | 78.24 ± 4.08 | 19.55 ± 5.04 | 37.18 ± 0.45 | 3.91 ± 1.01 | 36.99 ± 4.64 | 0.28 ± 0.07 |
| 2 | Vehicle (1% w/v CMC) + HFD ( | 10 mL | 315.42 ± 27.17### | 108.04 ± 11.67### | 17.38 ± 3.97### | 21.60 ± 2.34### | 276.40 ± 26.38### | 10.57 ± 3.86# |
| 3 |
| 10 mg | 156.06 ± 20.65c | 28.42 ± 6.65b | 50.37 ± 3.67c | 5.68 ± 1.33b | 100.00 ± 20.36c | 0.55 ± 0.09a |
| 4 |
| 100 mg | 231.32 ± 22.00a | 94.90 ± 21.38 | 33.94 ± 3.30b | 18.98 ± 4.28 | 178.45 ± 22.40b | 2.84 ± 0.63 |
| 5 |
| 200 mg | 181.30 ± 12.26c | 48.34 ± 9.66a | 47.65 ± 1.24c | 9.67 ± 1.93a | 123.98 ± 11.70c | 1.02 ± 0.22a |
Values are in Mean ± SEM; data was analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test. TC—total cholesterol; TG—triglycerides; HDL-c—high density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-c—low density lipoprotein-cholesterol; VLDL—very low density lipoprotein- cholesterol; AI—atherogenic index.
F (4, 20) = 25.856; P < 0.0001 (for total cholesterol).
F (4, 20) = 10.308; P < 0.0001 (for triglycerides).
F (4, 20) = 21.007; P < 0.0001 (for HDL-c).
F (4, 20) = 10.297; P < 0.0001 (for VLDL).
F (4, 20) = 27.085; P < 0.0001 (for LDL-c).
F (4, 20) = 4.623; P < 0.0083 (for AI).
# P < 0.05 and ### P < 0.001 as compared to vehicle treated control; a P < 0.05, b P < 0.01, and c P < 0.001 as compared to HFD treated control.
Effect of dried pulp of Aloe succotrina leaves on liver HMG/mevalonate ratio, malondialdehyde (MDA), and reduced glutathione (GSH) levels of HFD-induced hyperlipidemic rats.
| Group number | Treatment (p.o.) | Dose (kg−1) | Number of animals | HMG/mevalonate ratio | MDA levels (nmol/mg tissue) | GSH levels ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vehicle (1% w/v CMC) | 10 mL | 6 | 0.59 ± 0.23 | 52.60 ± 10.49 | 735.21 ± 57.31 |
| 2 | Vehicle (1% w/v CMC) + HFD | 10 mL | 6 | 0.37 ± 0.13 | 179.74 ± 23.77## | 297.62 ± 24.81### |
| 3 | Atorvastatin + HFD | 10 mg | 3 | 3.29 ± 0.37c | 13.43 ± 4.65c | 665.84 ± 24.34c |
| 4 |
| 100 mg | 5 | 0.81 ± 0.13 | 78.56 ± 27.66b | 303.84 ± 31.85 |
| 5 |
| 200 mg | 5 | 1.68 ± 0.34b | 52.72 ± 12.32c | 617.86 ± 26.35c |
Values are in Mean ± SEM; data was analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test.
F (4, 20) = 14.402; P < 0.0001 (for HMG/mevalonate ratio).
F (4, 20) = 10.117; P < 0.0001 (for MDA levels).
F (4, 20) = 25.390; P < 0.0001 (for reduced glutathione levels).
## P < 0.01 and ### P < 0.001 as compared to vehicle treated control; b P < 0.05 and c P < 0.001 as compared to HFD treated control.
Effect of dried pulp of Aloe succotrina leaves on body weight of fructose-induced hyperlipidemic rats.
| Group number | Treatment (p.o.) | Dose (kg−1) | Body weight (g) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 0 | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | ||||
| 1 | Vehicle (1% w/v CMC)0 | 10 mL | 80.66 ± 4.39 | 83.83 ± 5.43 | 94.00 ± 4.97 | 102.33 ± 4.69 | 114.16 ± 5.52 |
| 2 | Vehicle (1% w/v CMC) + fructose (25% w/v) | 10 mL | 81.16 ± 7.35 | 88.16 ± 9.00 | 92.00 ± 10.34 | 95.16 ± 10.42 | 106.83 ± 11.08 |
| 3 | Atorvastatin + fructose (25% w/v) | 10 mg | 78.66 ± 3.54 | 86.83 ± 4.33 | 95.66 ± 4.75 | 102.83 ± 3.52 | 113.16 ± 3.09 |
| 4 |
| 100 mg | 83.16 ± 5.40 | 91.66 ± 7.19 | 99.83 ± 7.04 | 96.83 ± 6.56 | 106.8 ± 9.50 |
| 5 |
| 200 mg | 80.83 ± 4.47 | 86.5 ± 6.13 | 96.16 ± 5.50 | 106.00 ± 4.44 | 119.16 ± 6.14 |
(n = 5) in each group. Values are in Mean ± SEM; data was analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test.
F (4, 25) = 0.95; P < 0.04516 (for fructose treated control from week 0 to week 4).
F (4, 25) = 0.19; P < 0.9431 (comparison among various groups at week 1).
F (4, 25) = 0.18; P < 0.9464 (comparison among various groups at week 2).
F (4, 25) = 0.49; P < 0.7422 (comparison among various groups at week 3).
F (4, 25) = 0.49; P < 0.7432 (comparison among various groups at week 4).
Effect of dried pulp of Aloe succotrina leaves on relative liver and heart weight of fructose-induced hyperlipidemic rats.
| Group number | Treatment (p.o.) | Dose (kg−1) | Relative organ weight | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liver weight | ||||
| 1 | Vehicle (1% w/v CMC) | 10 mL | 3.48 ± 0.15 | 0.40 ± 0.01 |
| 2 | Vehicle (1% w/v CMC) + fructose (25% w/v) | 10 mL | 5.78 ± 0.74## | 0.42 ± 0.02 |
| 3 | Atorvastatin + fructose (25% w/v) | 10 mg | 3.87 ± 0.36a | 0.47 ± 0.03 |
| 4 |
| 100 mg | 3.92 ± 0.30a | 0.46 ± 0.02 |
| 5 |
| 200 mg | 3.87 ± 0.29a | 0.49 ± 0.03 |
Relative weight = (organ weight/body weight) × 100.
(n = 5) in each group. Values are in Mean ± SEM; data was analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test.
F (4, 21) = 4.742; P < 0.007 (for relative liver weight).
F (4, 21) = 1.594; P < 0.1045 (for relative heart weight).
## P < 0.01 as compared to vehicle treated control; a P < 0.05 as compared to fructose treated control.
Effect of the dried pulp of Aloe succotrina leaves on serum lipid levels in fructose-induced hyperlipidemic rats.
| Group |
Treatment |
Dose | Lipid Levels (mg/dL) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC | TG | HDL-c | VLDL | LDL-c | AI | |||
| 1 | Vehicle (1% w/v CMC) | 10 mL | 67.09 ± 2.74 | 39.47 ± 1.75 | 37.26 ± 1.83 | 7.93 ± 0.37 | 21.83 ± 4.54 | 1.07 ± 0.06 |
| 2 | Vehicle (1% w/v CMC) + fructose (25% w/v) | 10 mL | 85.56 ± 4.37# | 67.10 ± 12.69# | 17.36 ± 1.49# | 13.42 ± 2.54# | 54.80 ± 6.03## | 3.93 ± 0.74### |
| 3 | Atorvastatin + fructose (25% w/v) | 10 mg | 64.32 ± 4.09a | 22.59 ± 2.14c | 41.72 ± 6.06b | 4.52 ± 0.43c | 18.09 ± 4.89b | 0.60 ± 0.10c |
| 4 |
| 100 mg | 71.97 ± 6.12 | 33.22 ± 3.98b | 42.33 ± 5.48 | 6.64 ± 0.80b | 38.53 ± 6.94 | 1.42 ± 0.32c |
| 5 |
| 200 mg | 66.15 ± 2.16a | 24.74 ± 2.44c | 26.80 ± 4.71b | 4.95 ± 0.49c | 18.87 ± 5.27b | 0.62 ± 0.09c |
(n = 5) in each group; values are in Mean ± SEM; data was analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test.
TC—total cholesterol; TG—triglycerides; HDL-c—high density lipoprotein- cholesterol.
LDL-c—low density lipoprotein- cholesterol; VLDL—very low density lipoprotein- cholesterol; AI—atherogenic index.
F (4, 21) = 4.344; P < 0.0109 (for total cholesterol); F (4, 21) = 8.425; P < 0.0004 (for triglycerides); F (4, 21) = 6.170; P < 0.0021 (for HDL-c); F (4, 21) = 8.414; P < 0.0004 (for VLDL); F (4, 21) = 8.118; P < 0.0005 (for LDL-c); F (4, 21) =14.361; P < 0.0001 (for AI).
# P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, and ### P < 0.001 as compared to vehicle treated control; a P < 0.05, b P < 0.01, and c P < 0.001 as compared to fructose treated control.
Effect of dried pulp of Aloe succotrina leaves on liver HMG/mevalonate ratio, MDA, and reduced glutathione (GSH) levels of fructose-induced hyperlipidemic rats.
| Group | Treatment | Dose | HMG/mevalonate ratio | MDA levels (nmol/mg tissue) | GSH levels ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vehicle (1% w/v CMC) | 10 mL | 3.44 ± 1.22 | 7.64 ± 1.56 | 524.55 ± 35.89 |
| 2 | Vehicle (1% w/v CMC) + fructose (25% w/v) | 10 mL | 1.98 ± 0.36 | 49.02 ± 0.92### | 317.20 ± 19.40### |
| 3 | Atorvastatin + fructose (25% w/v) | 10 mg | 6.17 ± 0.93a | 6.92 ± 0.69c | 445.74 ± 19.57a |
| 4 |
| 100 mg | 3.75 ± 0.78 | 31.66 ± 8.33a | 324.04 ± 13.31 |
| 5 |
| 200 mg | 5.66 ± 0.67a | 8.85 ± 2.05c | 428.13 ± 34.29a |
(n = 5) in each group; values are in Mean ± SEM; data was analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test.
F (4, 21) = 4.140; P < 0.0001 (for HMG/mevalonate ratio).
F (4, 21) = 7.607; P < 0.0007 (for MDA levels).
F (4, 21) = 11.289; P < 0.0001 (for reduced glutathione).
### P < 0.001 as compared to vehicle treated control.
a P < 0.05, b P < 0.05, and c P < 0.001 as compared to fructose treated control.