Literature DB >> 29675508

Are Trabecular Metal Cones a Valid Option to Treat Metaphyseal Bone Defects in Complex Primary and Revision Knee Arthroplasty?

Tommaso Bonanzinga1,2,3, Thorsten Gehrke4, Akos Zahar4, Stefano Zaffagnini2,3,5, Maurilio Marcacci1,6, Carl Haasper2.   

Abstract

Purpose  Metaphyseal bone defects are a challenge in complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Recently, several studies have been published with promising results about the use of Trabecular Metal (TM) cones to address bone defects. The aim of this study is to review the literature to assess the efficacy of TM cones to address metaphyseal bone loss. Methods  A comprehensive search was performed on PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, and Google Scholar databases using various combinations of the following keywords: "metaphyseal," "cones," "tantalum," "knee," and "revision." Only papers reporting clinical data about the use of trabecular metal cones were included in the analysis. In vitro studies, case reports, surgical technique, or other studies where it was not possible to collect clinical data were excluded. Patients characteristics, details of the surgical procedures, outcome, and complications were collected from each included study. Results  No controlled studies were available in the literature and all the papers were case series. In 16 studies included, the records of 442 patients with 447 implants and 523 TM cones were reported. The mean follow-up was 42 months (range: 5-105) for 360 procedures. Among 437 procedures, 30.4% were septic revisions. The Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) classification was available for 352 defects: 13 type 1, 69 type 2A, 115 type 2B, and 155 type 3. To manage these 352 defects, 360 TM cones were implanted. Intraoperative fractures occurred 13 times (10 femoral/3 tibial), 6 required surgical fixation. The overall infection rate was 7.38%, and the infection rate for the aseptic procedures was 0.99%. An aseptic exchange was performed 13 times, among these procedures two TM cones were loose. Signs of loosening were found just in 1.3% of the 523 TM cones implanted (5 femoral/2 tibial) during 447 procedures. Conclusion  The TM cones are an effective solution to manage bone defects in complex primary and revision TKA at intermediate follow-up. The incidence of complications was low; however, the femoral metaphysis proved to be more susceptible to complications. Level of Evidence  Level IV, systematic review of level IV studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cones; knee; metaphyseal; revision; tantalum

Year:  2017        PMID: 29675508      PMCID: PMC5906107          DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1608950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Joints        ISSN: 2512-9090


  37 in total

1.  Fibrous tissue ingrowth and attachment to porous tantalum.

Authors:  S A Hacking; J D Bobyn; K Toh; M Tanzer; J J Krygier
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000-12-15

Review 2.  A porous tantalum trabecular metal: basic science.

Authors:  Robert Cohen
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2002-04

Review 3.  Management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Bush; Joseph B Wilson; T Parker Vail
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The Effect of Porous Tantalum Cones on Mechanical Alignment and Canal-Fill Ratio in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed with Uncemented Stems.

Authors:  Martin Bédard; Katherine Cabrejo-Jones; Michèle Angers; Rémi Pelletier-Roy; Stéphane Pelet
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Zonal fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Morgan-Jones; S I S Oussedik; H Graichen; F S Haddad
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  In Response to "Treatment of Severe Bone Defects During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty with Structural Allografts and Porous Metal Cones - A Systematic Review".

Authors:  Ivan De Martino; Peter K Sculco
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Early results of the use of tantalum femoral cones for revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  James L Howard; Jeremy Kudera; David G Lewallen; Arlen D Hanssen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Tantalum cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. A promising short-term result with 29 cones in 21 patients.

Authors:  Manuel Villanueva-Martínez; Basilio De la Torre-Escudero; José M Rojo-Manaute; Antonio Ríos-Luna; Francisco Chana-Rodriguez
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Tantalum Cones Provide Durable Mid-term Fixation in Revision TKA.

Authors:  Ivan De Martino; Vincenzo De Santis; Peter K Sculco; Rocco D'Apolito; Joseph B Assini; Giorgio Gasparini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Can tantalum cones provide fixation in complex revision knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Michael P Bolognesi; Robert A Henderson; Elizabeth S Soileau; Thomas Parker Vail
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  11 in total

1.  Metaphyseal cones and sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: Two sides of the same coin? Complications, clinical and radiological results-a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  A Zanirato; M Formica; L Cavagnaro; S Divano; G Burastero; L Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2019-03-16

2.  Preliminary clinical results of coated porous tibia cones in septic and aseptic revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Malte Ohlmeier; Christian Lausmann; Matthias Wolff; Hussein Abdelaziz; Thorsten Gehrke; Mustafa Citak
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Risk factors for aseptic loosening in complex revision total knee arthroplasty using rotating hinge implants.

Authors:  Ali Levent; Eduardo M Suero; Thorsten Gehrke; Iman Godarzi Bakhtiari; Mustafa Citak
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  [Bone defect management in revision knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Eric Röhner; Markus Heinecke; Georg Matziolis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  Are Metaphyseal Sleeves a Viable Option to Treat Bone Defect during Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Tommaso Bonanzinga; Ibrahim Akkawi; Akos Zahar; Thorsten Gehrke; Carl Haasper; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2019-10-11

6.  Midterm Outcomes of Tantalum Metal Cones for Severe Bone Loss in Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ashok Rajgopal; Sumit Kumar; Kalpana Aggarwal
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-01-11

7.  The Joint-Specific BACH classification: A predictor of outcome in prosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Andrew James Hotchen; Martina Galea Wismayer; Eve Robertson-Waters; Stephen M McDonnell; Ben Kendrick; Adrian Taylor; Abtin Alvand; Martin McNally
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-11-06

8.  Does the use of 3D-printed cones give a chance to postpone the use of megaprostheses in patients with large bone defects in the knee joint?

Authors:  Daniel Kotrych; Sławomir Marcinkowski; Adam Brodecki; Marcin Anuszkiewicz; Jakub Kleszowski; Andrzej Bohatyrewicz; Dawid Ciechanowicz
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2022-07-15

9.  Midterm Radiographic Results and Reoperations of Tantalum Trabecular Metal Cones in Knee Arthroplasties.

Authors:  Sandra Tie Nishibe Minamoto; Luís Felipe Tupinambá da Silva; José Leonardo Rocha de Faria; Hugo Alexandre de Araujo Barros Cobra; Idemar Monteiro da Palma; Alan de Paula Mozella
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2022-06-20

10.  Reconstruction of Proximal Metaphyseal Femoral Defects Using Trabecular Metal Augments in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sebastian Simon; Bernhard J H Frank; Alexander Aichmair; Martin Dominkus; Jochen G Hofstaetter
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-04-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.