Literature DB >> 23414934

Tantalum cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. A promising short-term result with 29 cones in 21 patients.

Manuel Villanueva-Martínez1, Basilio De la Torre-Escudero, José M Rojo-Manaute, Antonio Ríos-Luna, Francisco Chana-Rodriguez.   

Abstract

Twenty-nine porous tantalum metaphyseal cones were implanted in 21 patients (14 women and 7 men) during revision TKA. The average age at the time of the procedure was 73.3 years. Sixteen revisions were considered aseptic and 5 were reimplantations after sepsis. Eight patients had stemmed revision implants and thirteen primary designs. According to the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute bone defect classification, femoral defects were rated as F3 in 14 knees and F2B in 3 knees. Tibial defects were rated as T2A in 3 cases, T2B in 3 cases and T3 in 5 cases. A femoral cone was inserted in 10 patients, a double cone (femur and tibia) in 8, and a single tibial cone in 3. A rotating hinge knee prosthesis (RHK, Zimmer) was inserted in 10 patients and a constrained condylar prosthesis (LCCK, Zimmer) in 11 patients. The diaphysis was cemented in 9 cases and, in 11 cases, just the metaphysis. At an average follow up of 36 months only one reconstruction was removed due to persistent infection. All metaphyseal cones showed evidence of stable osseointegration. According to the Knee Society Score the results were rated as excellent in 12 cases, good in 5 cases, fair in 3 and poor in 1 case. In the short term, porous tantalum metaphyseal cones provided structural support for large femoral and tibial defects. They also provided the environment for bone graft osseointegration, repair of femoral fractures and effective interdigitation of cement mantle into the trabecular metal cone.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23414934     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  13 in total

1.  Metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Danielle Y Ponzio; Matthew S Austin
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

2.  [The use of tantalum cones for reconstruction of bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  M Gebauer; T Gehrke; O Jakobs
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  Metaphyseal cones and sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: Two sides of the same coin? Complications, clinical and radiological results-a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  A Zanirato; M Formica; L Cavagnaro; S Divano; G Burastero; L Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2019-03-16

4.  Tantalum Cones Provide Durable Mid-term Fixation in Revision TKA.

Authors:  Ivan De Martino; Vincenzo De Santis; Peter K Sculco; Rocco D'Apolito; Joseph B Assini; Giorgio Gasparini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Are Trabecular Metal Cones a Valid Option to Treat Metaphyseal Bone Defects in Complex Primary and Revision Knee Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Tommaso Bonanzinga; Thorsten Gehrke; Akos Zahar; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci; Carl Haasper
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2017-12-14

6.  Impact of stem profile on the revisability and the need for osteotomy in well-fixed cemented revision total knee arthroplasty implants.

Authors:  Alexander Maslaris; Georgios Spyrou; Carsten Schoeneberg; Mustafa Citak; Georg Matziolis
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 2.928

7.  Biofunctionalization strategies on tantalum-based materials for osseointegrative applications.

Authors:  Carlos Mas-Moruno; Beatriz Garrido; Daniel Rodriguez; Elisa Ruperez; F Javier Gil
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Tibial component with and without stem extension in a trabecular metal cone construct.

Authors:  Marrigje F Meijer; Alexander L Boerboom; Martin Stevens; Inge H F Reininga; Dennis W Janssen; N Verdonschot; Sjoerd K Bulstra
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Early Survivorship of Newly Designed Highly Porous Metaphyseal Tibial Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brian P Chalmers; Christina M Malfer; David J Mayman; Geoffrey H Westrich; Peter K Sculco; Mathias P Bostrom; Seth A Jerabek
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-02-23

10.  Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alan de Paula Mozella; Hugo Alexandre de Araújo Barros Cobra
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2020-09-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.