Literature DB >> 16906109

Management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Jeffrey L Bush1, Joseph B Wilson, T Parker Vail.   

Abstract

Bone deficiencies around the knee can present a substantial challenge during revision total knee arthroplasty. Bone loss occurs from stress shielding, osteolysis, chronic infection, and bone removed during implant extraction. Smaller defects have traditionally been treated with cement filling or allograft bone chips. Larger defects can be reconstructed with bulk allografts or custom prostheses. A hinged prosthesis may be necessary to account for ligamentous insufficiency. In addition to traditional methods of managing bone loss, recent developments include the use of metaphyseal-filling implants made of highly porous metal. These implants can be press-fit into host bone to accommodate large metaphyseal defects. Each revision knee surgery provides unique challenges, requiring proficiency in multiple techniques of bone loss management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16906109     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000229360.04620.93

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  15 in total

1.  Revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves provides radiographic ingrowth and stable fixation.

Authors:  Catherine J Fedorka; Antonia F Chen; Michael R Pagnotto; Lawrence S Crossett; Brian A Klatt
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Are Trabecular Metal Cones a Valid Option to Treat Metaphyseal Bone Defects in Complex Primary and Revision Knee Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Tommaso Bonanzinga; Thorsten Gehrke; Akos Zahar; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci; Carl Haasper
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2017-12-14

Review 3.  Bone defect classifications in revision total knee arthroplasty, their reliability and utility: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yasim Khan; Sumit Arora; Abhishek Kashyap; Mohit Kumar Patralekh; Lalit Maini
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-07-03       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Short-Term Survivorship of 3D-Printed Titanium Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Fabio Mancino; Vincenzo Di Matteo; Fabrizio Mocini; Silvia Pietramala; Alessandro Singlitico; Andrea De Fazio; Vincenzo La Vergata; Giorgio Gasparini; Giulio Maccauro; Ivan De Martino
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-06-27

5.  A novel biomimetic polymer scaffold design enhances bone ingrowth.

Authors:  Chris P Geffre; David S Margolis; John T Ruth; Donald W DeYoung; Brandi C Tellis; John A Szivek
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.396

6.  Tibial bone loss in revision TKA: Options for management without sleeves and cones -a schematic review.

Authors:  Sibin Surendran; P Gopinathan
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-17

7.  Role of metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: Rationale, indications and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Hosam E Matar; Benjamin V Bloch; Peter J James
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-12-23

8.  Daily application of low magnitude mechanical stimulus inhibits the growth of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells in vitro.

Authors:  Melis Olcum; Engin Ozcivici
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.722

9.  Tibial component with and without stem extension in a trabecular metal cone construct.

Authors:  Marrigje F Meijer; Alexander L Boerboom; Martin Stevens; Inge H F Reininga; Dennis W Janssen; N Verdonschot; Sjoerd K Bulstra
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Use of a trabecular metal cone made of tantalum, to treat bone defects during revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alan de Paula Mozella; Ricardo Reiniger Olivero; Hugo Alexandre; Araújo Barros Cobra
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2014-03-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.