Literature DB >> 12421053

Why do non-color words interfere with color naming?

Jennifer S Burt1.   

Abstract

In the non-color-word Stroop task, university students' response latencies were longer for low-frequency than for higher frequency target words. Visual identity primes facilitated color naming in groups reading the prime silently or processing it semantically (Experiment 1) but did not when participants generated a rhyme of the prime (Experiment 3). With auditory identity primes, generating an associate or a rhyme of the prime produced interference (Experiments 2 and 3). Color-naming latencies were longer for nonwords than for words (Experiment 4). There was a small long-term repetition benefit in color naming for low-frequency words that had been presented in the lexical decision task (Experiment 5). Facilitation of word recognition speeds color naming except when phonological activation of the base word increases response competition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12421053     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.28.5.1019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  23 in total

1.  The effect of orthographic and emotional neighbourhood in a colour categorization task.

Authors:  Anna-Malika Camblats; Stéphanie Mathey
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-11-09

2.  The distractor frequency effect in a delayed picture-word interference task: further evidence for a late locus of distractor exclusion.

Authors:  Elisah Dhooge; Robert J Hartsuiker
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-02

3.  The magic of words reconsidered: Investigating the automaticity of reading color-neutral words in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Sachiko Kinoshita; Bianca De Wit; Dennis Norris
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Comparing perception of Stroop stimuli in focused versus divided attention paradigms: evidence for dramatic processing differences.

Authors:  Ami Eidels; James T Townsend; Daniel Algom
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-09-05

5.  The role of valence and frequency in the emotional Stroop task.

Authors:  Todd A Kahan; Charles D Hely
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-10

6.  The semantic Stroop effect is controlled by endogenous attention.

Authors:  Sachiko Kinoshita; Luke Mills; Dennis Norris
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Semantic generalization of punishment-related attentional priority.

Authors:  Laurent Grégoire; Andy J Kim; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2021-04-18

8.  Facilitating goal-oriented behaviour in the Stroop task: when executive control is influenced by automatic processing.

Authors:  Benjamin A Parris; Sarah Bate; Scott D Brown; Timothy L Hodgson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Pupillary Stroop effects.

Authors:  Bruno Laeng; Marte Ørbo; Terje Holmlund; Michele Miozzo
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-09-24

10.  Differential attentional bias in generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Zhiyan Wang; Yan Wu; Yiyun Cai; Yifeng Shen; Liwei Wang; Shenxun Shi
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 2.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.