Literature DB >> 11716063

On a variant of Stroop's paradigm: which cognitions press your buttons?

M Brown1, D Besner.   

Abstract

The Stroop effect typically refers to the fact that the time to identify the color of a visually presented word is affected by the relationship between the word and the color When the (irrelevant) word is semantically related to the color (e.g., the word green, presented in red) response time is slower than if the word is neutral or unrelated. One question that has been posed concerns whether semantics plays a role only when the task requires an explicit verbal response, or whether it also plays a role when the response is manual. Sharma and McKenna (1998) have reported that semantics plays a role only when the response is vocal. A reanalysis of their data shows that semantics also plays a role when manual responses are made.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11716063     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  4 in total

1.  SEMANTIC POWER MEASURED THROUGH THE INTERFERENCE OF WORDS WITH COLOR-NAMING.

Authors:  G S KLEIN
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1964-12

Review 2.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review.

Authors:  C M MacLeod
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Differential components of the manual and vocal Stroop tasks.

Authors:  D Sharma; F P McKenna
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-09

Review 4.  The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology.

Authors:  J M Williams; A Mathews; C MacLeod
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 17.737

  4 in total
  13 in total

1.  Single letter coloring and spatial cuing eliminates a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Laurie A Manwell; Martha Anne Roberts; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

2.  Suggestion does not de-automatize word reading: evidence from the semantically based Stroop task.

Authors:  Maria Augustinova; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

3.  Filling a gap in the semantic gradient: color associates and response set effects in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Evan F Risko; James R Schmidt; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

4.  Sequential congruency effects: disentangling priming and conflict adaptation.

Authors:  Olga Puccioni; Antonino Vallesi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-07-07

5.  Focusing on task conflict in the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Olga Entel; Joseph Tzelgov
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-12-03

6.  Alcohol attentional bias: drinking salience or cognitive impairment?

Authors:  Javad Salehi Fadardi; W Miles Cox
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Dissociating stimulus-set and response-set in the context of task-set switching.

Authors:  Paul D Kieffaber; John K Kruschke; Raymond Y Cho; Philip M Walker; William P Hetrick
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The semantic Stroop effect is controlled by endogenous attention.

Authors:  Sachiko Kinoshita; Luke Mills; Dennis Norris
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Neural Mechanisms of Selective Attention in Children with Amblyopia.

Authors:  Aibao Zhou; Yanfei Jiang; Jianming Chen; Jianlan Wei; Baobao Dang; Shifeng Li; Qiongying Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Application of the ex-Gaussian function to the effect of the word blindness suggestion on Stroop task performance suggests no word blindness.

Authors:  Benjamin A Parris; Zoltan Dienes; Timothy L Hodgson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.