Literature DB >> 2967128

Time course of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement.

E S Monrad1, O M Hess, T Murakami, H Nonogi, W J Corin, H P Krayenbuehl.   

Abstract

To assess the time course and extent of regression of myocardial hypertrophy after removal of the inciting hemodynamic stress, 21 patients with either aortic stenosis or aortic insufficiency were studied preoperatively, after an intermediate period (1.6 +/- 0.5 years), and late (8.1 +/- 2.9 years) after aortic valve replacement, and results were compared with those in 11 control patients. After aortic valve replacement there was significant hemodynamic improvement, with a fall in the left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (164 +/- 73 to 105 +/- 35 ml/m2, p less than .01), a fall in left heart filling pressure (19 +/- 9 to 12 +/- 5 mm Hg, p less than .01), and maintenance of the cardiac index (3.3 +/- 0.8 to 3.5 +/- 0.8 liters/min/m2, NS) and left ventricular ejection fraction (60 +/- 13% to 64 +/- 10%, NS). By the late study the cardiac index (4.0 +/- 0.6 liters/min/m2, p less than .01) and left ventricular ejection fraction (66 +/- 15%, p less than .05) had further increased and were significantly greater than before surgery. For the group as a whole, the left ventricular muscle mass index fell 31% after surgery by the time of the intermediate postoperative study (174 +/- 38 vs 120 +/- 29 g/m2, p less than .01), and a further 13% from the intermediate to the late study (105 +/- 32 g/m2, p less than .05). At the preoperative study left ventricular muscle mass index was greatest in those patients with aortic insufficiency (191 +/- 36 g/m2), and greater in those with aortic stenosis (158 +/- 33 g/m2) than in control subjects (85 +/- 9 g/m2, p less than .05). At the intermediate postoperative study left ventricular muscle mass index remained significantly higher in both those with preoperative aortic insufficiency (128 +/- 29 g/m2) and those with stenosis (114 +/- 27 g/m2) than in the control subjects (p less than .01). By the time of the late postoperative study there were no longer any significant differences in left ventricular muscle mass index. Thus, the regression of myocardial hypertrophy is a process that occurs over many years after correction of the primary hemodynamic abnormality. As this process of myocardial remodeling occurs, continued improvement in cardiac function may occur, and the improvement occurring between the intermediate and late postoperative studies at a slight but constant afterload excess (inherent in the relative stenosis of the aortic prosthesis) suggests that the hypertrophied myocardium is operating at a reduced level compared with normal myocardium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2967128     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.77.6.1345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  40 in total

1.  Evaluation of postoperative cardiac function and long-term results in patients after aortic valve replacement for aortic valve disease with increased left ventricular mass.

Authors:  M Natsuaki; T Itoh; Y Okazaki; H Ishida; M Hamada; K Rikitake; K Naitoh
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-01

2.  [Hemodynamic evaluations of patients with small aortic annulus with St. Jude Medical prosthetic heart valve].

Authors:  T Shimabukuro; Y Takeuchi; A Gomi; H Nakatani; Y Suda; K Kono; N Nagano
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1998-12

3.  Clinical value of regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Sayuri Yamabe; Yoshihiro Dohi; Akifumi Higashi; Hiroki Kinoshita; Yoshiharu Sada; Takayuki Hidaka; Satoshi Kurisu; Nobuo Shiode; Yasuki Kihara
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 4.  Atrophied cardiomyocytes and their potential for rescue and recovery of ventricular function.

Authors:  Mark R Heckle; David M Flatt; Yao Sun; Salvatore Mancarella; Tony N Marion; Ivan C Gerling; Karl T Weber
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.214

5.  Regression of left ventricular mass after implantation of the sutureless 3f Enable aortic bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Giovanni Concistrè; Antonio Miceli; Federica Marchi; Francesca Chiaramonti; Mattia Glauber; Marco Solinas
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2015-04-01

Review 6.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention.

Authors:  P Pibarot; J G Dumesnil
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Left ventricular mass regression after sutureless implantation of the Perceval S aortic valve bioprosthesis: preliminary results.

Authors:  Giuseppe Santarpino; Steffen Pfeiffer; Francesco Pollari; Giovanni Concistrè; Ferdinand Vogt; Theodor Fischlein
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-10-08

8.  Predictors of improvement in diastolic function after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Konigstein Maayan; Biner Simon; Topilsky Yan; Abramowitz Yigal; Havakuk Ofer; Ben-Assa Eyal; Leshem-Rubinow Eran; Arbel Yaron; Keren Gad; Banai Shmuel; Finkelstein Ariel
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2013-11-14

9.  Changes in left ventricular filling after valve replacement for aortic stenosis.

Authors:  M C Herregods; B Denef; A Aubert; H de Geest
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1993-09

10.  Cardiac-restricted overexpression or deletion of tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-4: differential effects on left ventricular structure and function following pressure overload-induced hypertrophy.

Authors:  William M Yarbrough; Catalin Baicu; Rupak Mukherjee; An Van Laer; William T Rivers; Richard A McKinney; Corey B Prescott; Robert E Stroud; Parker D Freels; Kia N Zellars; Michael R Zile; Francis G Spinale
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 4.733

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.