Literature DB >> 25873820

Regression of left ventricular mass after implantation of the sutureless 3f Enable aortic bioprosthesis.

Giovanni Concistrè, Antonio Miceli, Federica Marchi, Francesca Chiaramonti, Mattia Glauber, Marco Solinas.   

Abstract

Left ventricular hypertrophy in aortic stenosis is considered a compensatory response for the maintenance of systolic function but a risk factor for cardiac morbidity and death. We investigated the degree of left ventricular mass regression after implantation of the sutureless Medtronic 3f Enable Aortic Bioprosthesis. We studied 19 patients who, from May 2010 through July 2011, underwent isolated aortic valve replacement with the 3f Enable bioprosthetic valve, with clinical and echocardiographic follow-up at 6 months. The mean age was 77.1 ± 5.1 years (range, 68-86 yr); 14 patients were women (73.7%); and the mean logistic EuroSCORE was 15.4% ± 11.8%. Echocardiography was performed preoperatively, at discharge, and at 6 months' follow-up. The left ventricular mass was calculated by means of the Devereux formula and indexed to body surface area. The left ventricular mass index decreased from 146.1 ± 47.6 g/m(2) at baseline to 118.1 ± 39.8 g/m(2) at follow-up (P=0.003). The left ventricular ejection fraction did not change significantly. The mean transaortic gradient decreased from 57.3 ± 14.2 mmHg at baseline to 12.3 ± 4.6 mmHg at discharge and 12.2 ± 5.3 mmHg at follow-up (P <0.001), and these decreases were accompanied by substantial clinical improvement. No moderate or severe paravalvular leakage was present at discharge or at follow-up. In isolated aortic stenosis, aortic valve replacement with the 3f Enable bioprosthesis results in significant regression of left ventricular mass at 6 months' follow-up. However, this regression needs to be verified by long-term echocardiographic follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic valve stenosis/complications/echocardiography/physiopathology/surgery; bioprosthesis; cardiomegaly/etiology; heart valve prosthesis; hypertrophy, left ventricular/etiology/complications/physiopathology; prosthesis design; ventricular remodeling

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25873820      PMCID: PMC4382875          DOI: 10.14503/THIJ-13-3943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J        ISSN: 0730-2347


  26 in total

1.  Left ventricular function before and following aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  J W Kennedy; J Doces; D K Stewart
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Prediction of late results following valve replacement in aortic valve stenosis. Seventeen years of follow-up examined with the Cox regression analysis.

Authors:  O Lund; M Vaeth
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings.

Authors:  R B Devereux; D R Alonso; E M Lutas; G J Gottlieb; E Campo; I Sachs; N Reichek
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1986-02-15       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Time course of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  E S Monrad; O M Hess; T Murakami; H Nonogi; W J Corin; H P Krayenbuehl
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism influences degree of left ventricular hypertrophy and its regression in patients undergoing operation for aortic stenosis.

Authors:  G Dellgren; M J Eriksson; I Blange; L A Brodin; K Rådegran; C Sylvén
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Wall stress and patterns of hypertrophy in the human left ventricle.

Authors:  W Grossman; D Jones; L P McLaurin
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Valve replacement for aortic stenosis: the curative potential of early operation.

Authors:  O Lund
Journal:  Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Suppl       Date:  1993

8.  Preoperative risk evaluation and stratification of long-term survival after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Reasons for earlier operative intervention.

Authors:  O Lund
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  The potential for normal long term survival and morbidity rates after valve replacement for aortic stenosis.

Authors:  O Lund; K Magnussen; M Knudsen; H Pilegaard; T T Nielsen; O K Albrechtsen
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  1996-05

10.  Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy during 10 years after valve replacement for aortic stenosis is related to the preoperative risk profile.

Authors:  Ole Lund; Kristian Emmertsen; Inge Dørup; Finn T Jensen; Christian Flø
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.