Literature DB >> 12536137

Large capacity storage of integrated objects before change blindness.

Rogier Landman1, Henk Spekreijse, Victor A F Lamme.   

Abstract

Normal people have a strikingly low ability to detect changes in a visual scene. This has been taken as evidence that the brain represents only a few objects at a time, namely those currently in the focus of attention. In the present study, subjects were asked to detect changes in the orientation of rectangular figures in a textured display across a 1600 ms gray interval. In the first experiment, change detection improved when the location of a possible change was cued during the interval. The cue remained effective during the entire interval, but after the interval, it was ineffective, suggesting that an initially large representation was overwritten by the post-change display. To control for an effect of light intensity during the interval on the decay of the representation, we compared performance with a gray or a white interval screen in a second experiment. We found no difference between these conditions. In the third experiment, attention was occasionally misdirected during the interval by first cueing the wrong figure, before cueing the correct figure. This did not compromise performance compared to a single cue, indicating that when an item is attentionally selected, the representation of yet unchosen items remains available. In the fourth experiment, the cue was shown to be effective when changes in figure size and orientation were randomly mixed. At the time the cue appeared, subjects could not know whether size or orientation would change, therefore these results suggest that the representation contains features in their 'bound' state. Together, these findings indicate that change blindness involves overwriting of a large capacity representation by the post-change display.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12536137     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00402-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  139 in total

1.  Does visual short-term memory have a high-capacity stage?

Authors:  Michi Matsukura; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-12

2.  Control of working memory content in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Britta Hahn; Andrew Hollingworth; Benjamin M Robinson; Samuel T Kaiser; Carly J Leonard; Valerie M Beck; Emily S Kappenman; Steven J Luck; James M Gold
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Are multiple visual short-term memory storages necessary to explain the retro-cue effect?

Authors:  Tal Makovski
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

4.  Erratum to: The reliability of retro-cues determines the fate of noncued visual working memory representations.

Authors:  Eren Gunseli; Dirk van Moorselaar; Martijn Meeter; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

Review 5.  Subjective inflation: phenomenology's get-rich-quick scheme.

Authors:  J D Knotts; Brian Odegaard; Hakwan Lau; David Rosenthal
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2018-11-14

6.  Transsaccadic integration of visual features in a line intersection task.

Authors:  Steven L Prime; Matthias Niemeier; J D Crawford
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-23       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The role of early visual cortex in visual short-term memory and visual attention.

Authors:  Shani Offen; Denis Schluppeck; David J Heeger
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Distributing versus focusing attention in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Tal Makovsik; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-12

9.  Fragile visual short-term memory is an object-based and location-specific store.

Authors:  Yaïr Pinto; Ilja G Sligte; Kimron L Shapiro; Victor A F Lamme
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

10.  The strategic retention of task-relevant objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  Ashleigh M Maxcey-Richard; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.