Literature DB >> 29664337

Pancreatic Stiffness Quantified with MR Elastography: Relationship to Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreaticoenteric Anastomosis.

Yu Shi1, Ying Liu1, Feng Gao1, Yanqing Liu1, Shengzhen Tao1, Yue Li1, Kevin J Glaser1, Richard L Ehman1, Qiyong Guo1.   

Abstract

Purpose To describe the relationship between conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging parameters and MR elastography of the pancreas in association with pancreatic histologic features and occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Materials and Methods Patients who underwent preoperative MR imaging (MR elastography and diffusion-, T1-, and T2-weighted imaging) followed by pancreatectomy with pancreaticoenteric anastomosis were included. The relationships between preoperative MR imaging parameters, demographic data, and intraoperative factors with POPF risk were analyzed with logistic regression analyses. The correlation of MR imaging parameters with histologic characteristics was evaluated with multivariate regression analysis. Results A total of 112 patients (64 men, 48 women; median age, 58 years) were evaluated. Forty-two patients (37.5%) developed POPF and 20 (17.9%) developed high-grade POPF (grades B and C). Lower pancreatic stiffness (≤1.43 kPa; odds ratio [OR], 9.196; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.92, 43.98), nondilated main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter (<3 mm; OR, 7.298; 95% CI: 1.51, 35.34), and larger stump area (≥211 mm2; OR, 9.210; 95% CI: 1.53, 55.26) were risk factors for POPF. Lower pancreatic stiffness (≤1.27 kPa; OR, 8.389; 95% CI: 1.88, 37.41) was the only independent predictor of high-grade POPF. Log-transformed pancreatic stiffness was independently associated with fibrosis (β = 0.060; 95% CI: 0.052, 0.068), acinar atrophy (β = 0.015; 95% CI: 0.003, 0.028), and lipomatosis (β = -0.016; 95% CI: -0.026, -0.006). Conclusion Preoperative MR assessment of pancreatic stiffness, MPD diameter, and stump area are important predictors of POPF. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29664337      PMCID: PMC6067817          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018170450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  30 in total

1.  Prevention of pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Ronnie Tung Ping Poon; Siu Hung Lo; Daniel Fong; Sheung Tat Fan; John Wong
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Spatio-temporal directional filtering for improved inversion of MR elastography images.

Authors:  A Manduca; D S Lake; S A Kruse; R L Ehman
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Estimation of the absolute shear stiffness of human lung parenchyma using (1) H spin echo, echo planar MR elastography.

Authors:  Yogesh K Mariappan; Kevin J Glaser; David L Levin; Robert Vassallo; Rolf D Hubmayr; Carl Mottram; Richard L Ehman; Kiaran P McGee
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Can diffusion-weighted imaging serve as a biomarker of fibrosis in pancreatic adenocarcinoma?

Authors:  Elizabeth M Hecht; Michael Z Liu; Martin R Prince; Sachin Jambawalikar; Helen E Remotti; Stuart W Weisberg; Donald Garmon; Sara Lopez-Pintado; Yanghee Woo; Michael D Kluger; John A Chabot
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Preoperative CT scan helps to predict the occurrence of severe pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Hadrien Tranchart; Sébastien Gaujoux; Vinciane Rebours; Marie-Pierre Vullierme; Safi Dokmak; Philippe Levy; Anne Couvelard; Jacques Belghiti; Alain Sauvanet
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Correlation analysis between post-pancreatoduodenectomy pancreatic fistula and pancreatic histology.

Authors:  Fernando Leal Pereira; Fernando Torres Vasques; André de Moricz; Tércio de Campos; Adhemar Monteiro Pacheco; Rodrigo Altenfelder Silva
Journal:  Rev Col Bras Cir       Date:  2012

7.  Test-retest reliability of 3D EPI MR elastography of the pancreas.

Authors:  H An; Y Shi; Q Guo; Y Liu
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.350

8.  Differentiation of benign and malignant solid pancreatic masses using magnetic resonance elastography with spin-echo echo planar imaging and three-dimensional inversion reconstruction: a prospective study.

Authors:  Yu Shi; Feng Gao; Yue Li; Shengzhen Tao; Bing Yu; Zaiyi Liu; Yanqing Liu; Kevin J Glaser; Richard L Ehman; Qiyong Guo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Morphohistological features of pancreatic stump are the main determinant of pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Cristina Ridolfi; Maria Rachele Angiolini; Francesca Gavazzi; Paola Spaggiari; Maria Carla Tinti; Fara Uccelli; Marco Madonini; Marco Montorsi; Alessandro Zerbi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Randomized Controlled Trial of Pancreaticojejunostomy versus Stapler Closure of the Pancreatic Stump During Distal Pancreatectomy to Reduce Pancreatic Fistula.

Authors:  Manabu Kawai; Seiko Hirono; Ken-Ichi Okada; Masayuki Sho; Yoshiyuki Nakajima; Hidetoshi Eguchi; Hiroaki Nagano; Hisashi Ikoma; Ryou Morimura; Yutaka Takeda; Shin Nakahira; Kazuhiro Suzumura; Jiro Fujimoto; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  8 in total

1.  Estimation of pancreatic fibrosis and prediction of postoperative pancreatic fistula using extracellular volume fraction in multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT.

Authors:  Keitaro Sofue; Eisuke Ueshima; Atsuhiro Masuda; Sachiyo Shirakawa; Yoh Zen; Yoshiko Ueno; Yushi Tsujita; Takeru Yamaguchi; Shinji Yabe; Takeshi Tanaka; Noriko Inomata; Hirochika Toyama; Takumi Fukumoto; Yuzo Kodama; Takamichi Murakami
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Practical and clinical applications of pancreatic magnetic resonance elastography: a systematic review.

Authors:  Emily Steinkohl; Davide Bertoli; Tine Maria Hansen; Søren Schou Olesen; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes; Jens Brøndum Frøkjær
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-06-02

3.  Normative Pancreatic Stiffness Levels and Related Influences Established by Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Volunteers.

Authors:  Youli Xu; Xiaoli Cai; Yu Shi; Meng Yin; Gongyu Lan; Xianyi Zhang; Ruoyun Ji
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Matrix stiffness drives stromal autophagy and promotes formation of a protumorigenic niche.

Authors:  Anna Hupfer; Anna Brichkina; Anke Koeniger; Corinna Keber; Carsten Denkert; Petra Pfefferle; Frederik Helmprobst; Axel Pagenstecher; Alexander Visekruna; Matthias Lauth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Computed tomography-adjusted fistula risk score for predicting clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: Training and external validation of model upgrade.

Authors:  Yu Shi; Feng Gao; Yafei Qi; Hong Lu; Fulu Ai; Yang Hou; Chang Liu; Youli Xu; Xianyi Zhang; Xiaoli Cai
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 8.143

Review 6.  Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Pancreas of Individuals With Diabetes.

Authors:  John Virostko
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 5.555

7.  The usefulness of preoperative exocrine function evaluated by the 13C-trioctanoin breath test as a significant physiological predictor of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kato; Yukio Asano; Masahiro Ito; Norihiko Kawabe; Satoshi Arakawa; Masahiro Shimura; Daisuke Koike; Chihiro Hayashi; Kenshiro Kamio; Toki Kawai; Takayuki Ochi; Hironobu Yasuoka; Takahiko Higashiguchi; Daisuke Tochii; Yuka Kondo; Hidetoshi Nagata; Toshiaki Utsumi; Akihiko Horiguchi
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Prediction of clinically relevant Pancreatico-enteric Anastomotic Fistulas after Pancreatoduodenectomy using deep learning of Preoperative Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Wei Mu; Chang Liu; Feng Gao; Yafei Qi; Hong Lu; Zaiyi Liu; Xianyi Zhang; Xiaoli Cai; Ruo Yun Ji; Yang Hou; Jie Tian; Yu Shi
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 11.556

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.