| Literature DB >> 29663256 |
Kshitij Khatri1, Yi Pu2, Joshua A Klein3, Juan Wei1, Catherine E Costello1,2, Cheng Lin4,5, Joseph Zaia6,7,8.
Abstract
Analysis of singly glycosylated peptides has evolved to a point where large-scale LC-MS analyses can be performed at almost the same scale as proteomics experiments. While collisionally activated dissociation (CAD) remains the mainstay of bottom-up analyses, it performs poorly for the middle-down analysis of multiply glycosylated peptides. With improvements in instrumentation, electron-activated dissociation (ExD) modes are becoming increasingly prevalent for proteomics experiments and for the analysis of fragile modifications such as glycosylation. While these methods have been applied for glycopeptide analysis in isolated studies, an organized effort to compare their efficiencies, particularly for analysis of multiply glycosylated peptides (termed here middle-down glycoproteomics), has not been made. We therefore compared the performance of different ExD modes for middle-down glycopeptide analyses. We identified key features among the different dissociation modes and show that increased electron energy and supplemental activation provide the most useful data for middle-down glycopeptide analysis. Graphical Abstract.Entities:
Keywords: EThcD; Electron-activated dissociation; FTICR-MS; Glycoproteomics; Middle-down; Tandem MS; hotECD
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29663256 PMCID: PMC6004259 DOI: 10.1007/s13361-018-1909-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom ISSN: 1044-0305 Impact factor: 3.109